Development of Amine-Oxidase-Based Biosensors for Spermine and Spermidine Analysis

A Review on Bio- and Chemosensors for the Detection of Biogenic Amines in Food Safety Applications: The Status in 2022

This article provides an overview on the broad topic of biogenic amines (BAs) that are a persistent concern in the context of food quality and safety. They emerge mainly from the decomposition of amino acids in protein-rich food due to enzymes excreted by pathogenic bacteria that infect food under inappropriate storage conditions. While there are food authority regulations on the maximum allowed amounts of, e.g., histamine in fish, sensitive individuals can still suffer from medical conditions triggered by biogenic amines, and mass outbreaks of scombroid poisoning are reported regularly. We review first the classical techniques used for selective BA detection and quantification in analytical laboratories and focus then on sensor-based solutions aiming at on-site BA detection throughout the food chain. There are receptor-free chemosensors for BA detection and a vastly growing range of bio- and biomimetic sensors that employ receptors to enable selective molecular recognition. Regarding the receptors, we address enzymes, antibodies, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), and aptamers as the most recent class of BA receptors. Furthermore, we address the underlying transducer technologies, including optical, electrochemical, mass-sensitive, and thermal-based sensing principles. The review concludes with an assessment on the persistent limitations of BA sensors, a technological forecast, and thoughts on short-term solutions.

Co-localization of oxidase and catalase inside a porous support to improve the elimination of hydrogen peroxide: Oxidation of biogenic amines by amino oxidase from Pisum sativum

Diamine oxidase (DAO) from Pisum sativum is an enzyme that catalyzes the degradation of biogenic amines (BA) present in wine, producing harmless aldehydes and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). H2O2 promotes a rapid inactivation of the immobilized enzyme. At first glance, co-immobilization of DAO and catalase (CAT) could improve the elimination of the released hydrogen peroxide. Two different co-immobilized derivatives were prepared: (a) both enzymes co-localized and homogeneously distributed across the whole structure of a porous support, and (b) both enzymes we de-localized inside the porous support: DAO immobilized on the outer part of the porous support and catalase immobilized in the inner part. Co-localized derivatives were seven-fold more effective than de-localized ones for the elimination of hydrogen peroxide inside the porous support. In addition to that, the degradation of putrescine by DAO was three-fold more rapid when using both co-localized enzymes. The optimal co-localized derivative (containing 1.25 mg of DAO plus 25 mg of CAT per g of support) promoted the instantaneous elimination of 91% H2O2 released inside the porous support during putrescine oxidation. This optimal derivative preserves 92% of activity after three reaction cycles and DAO immobilized without catalase only preserves 41% of activity. Co-localization seems to be the key strategy to immobilize two sequential enzymes. When enzymes are immobilized in close proximity to each other in a co-localized pattern, the generation of byproducts as H2O2 is strongly reduced.