Droplet Digital PCR for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Mature Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Monitoring Response and Resistance to Treatment in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

The recent evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) targeted therapies led to a progressive change in the way clinicians manage the goals of treatment and evaluate the response to treatment in respect to the paradigm of the chemoimmunotherapy era. Continuous therapies with BTK inhibitors achieve prolonged and sustained control of the disease. On the other hand, venetoclax and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or, more recently, ibrutinib plus venetoclax combinations, given for a fixed duration, achieve undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) in the vast majority of patients. On these grounds, a time-limited MRD-driven strategy, a previously unexplored scenario in CLL, is being attempted. On the other side of the spectrum, novel genetic and non-genetic mechanisms of resistance to targeted treatments are emerging. Here we review the response assessment criteria, the evolution and clinical application of MRD analysis and the mechanisms of resistance according to the novel treatment strategies within clinical trials. The extent to which this novel evidence will translate in the real-life management of CLL patients remains an open issue to be addressed.

Noninvasive minimal residual disease assessment in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma using digital droplet PCR

Although several promising approaches for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) have been approved recently, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately achieve long-term responses. Circulating tumor (ct)DNA sequencing has emerged as a valuable tool to assess minimal residual disease (MRD). Correlations between MRD and outcomes have been shown in previously untreated DLBCL, but data on the repeated assessment of MRD in the dynamic course of rrDLBCL is limited. Here, we present an approach leveraging cost- and time-sensitivity of digital droplet (dd)PCR to repeatedly assess MRD in rrDLBCL and present proof-of-principle for its ability to predict outcomes.

Whole-genome informed circulating tumor DNA analysis by multiplex digital PCR for disease monitoring in B-cell lymphomas: a proof-of-concept study

Introduction

Analyzing liquid biopsies for tumor-specific aberrations can facilitate detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) during treatment and at follow-up. In this study, we assessed the clinical potential of using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of lymphomas at diagnosis to identify patient-specific structural (SVs) and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) to enable longitudinal, multi-targeted droplet digital PCR analysis (ddPCR) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA).

Methods

In 9 patients with B-cell lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma), comprehensive genomic profiling at diagnosis was performed by 30X WGS of paired tumor and normal specimens. Patient-specific multiplex ddPCR (m-ddPCR) assays were designed for simultaneous detection of multiple SNVs, indels and/or SVs, with a detection sensitivity of 0.0025% for SV assays and 0.02% for SNVs/indel assays. M-ddPCR was applied to analyze cfDNA isolated from serially collected plasma at clinically critical timepoints during primary and/or relapse treatment and at follow-up.

Results

A total of 164 SNVs/indels were identified by WGS including 30 variants known to be functionally relevant in lymphoma pathogenesis. The most frequently mutated genes included KMT2D, PIM1, SOCS1 and BCL2. WGS analysis further identified recurrent SVs including t(14;18)(q32;q21) (IGH::BCL2), and t(6;14)(p25;q32) (IGH::IRF4). Plasma analysis at diagnosis showed positive circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels in 88% of patients and the ctDNA burden correlated with baseline clinical parameters (LDH and sedimentation rate, p-value <0.01). While clearance of ctDNA levels after primary treatment cycle 1 was observed in 3/6 patients, all patients analyzed at final evaluation of primary treatment showed negative ctDNA, hence correlating with PET-CT imaging. One patient with positive ctDNA at interim also displayed detectable ctDNA (average variant allele frequency (VAF) 6.9%) in the follow-up plasma sample collected 2 years after final evaluation of primary treatment and 25 weeks before clinical manifestation of relapse.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrate that multi-targeted cfDNA analysis, using a combination of SNVs/indels and SVs candidates identified by WGS analysis, provides a sensitive tool for MRD monitoring and can detect lymphoma relapse earlier than clinical manifestation.

Research Topic: Measurable Residual Disease in Hematologic Malignancies. Can digital droplet PCR improve measurable residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies?

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring is progressively changing the management of hematologic malignancies. The possibility of detecting the persistence/reappearance of disease in patients in apparent clinical remission offers a refined risk stratification and a treatment decision making tool. Several molecular techniques are employed to monitor MRD, from conventional real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) to next generation sequencing and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), in different tissues or compartments through the detection of fusion genes, immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements or disease-specific mutations. RQ-PCR is still the gold standard for MRD analysis despite some limitations. ddPCR, considered the third-generation PCR, yields a direct, absolute, and accurate detection and quantification of low-abundance nucleic acids. In the setting of MRD monitoring it carries the major advantage of not requiring a reference standard curve built with the diagnostic sample dilution and of allowing to reduce the number of samples below the quantitative range. At present, the broad use of ddPCR to monitor MRD in the clinical practice is limited by the lack of international guidelines. Its application within clinical trials is nonetheless progressively growing both in acute lymphoblastic leukemia as well as in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The aim of this review is to summarize the accumulating data on the use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring in chronic lymphoid malignancies and to highlight how this new technique is likely to enter into the clinical practice.

Transferring measurable residual disease measurement in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia from quantitative real-time PCR to digital droplet PCR

BACKGROUND

Since the measurement of measurable residual disease (MRD) is part of clinical routine examination for children affected with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), continuous efforts are made to improve its method, applicability and accuracy. Whereas quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is considered as the gold standard for MRD detection and endowed with international guidelines for implementation and evaluation, these do not yet exist for digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). However, advantages are seen in droplet partitioning for MRD measurement to allow absolute quantification without depending on reference samples.

METHODS

In this study, 17 MRD targets of nine patients with childhood B-ALL were analyzed with qPCR and ddPCR, respectively. All patients were assigned to high risk group and had hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CD19 antibody therapy for relapse prevention. Starting with the sequences and guidelines of qPCR and optimizing the protocol for ddPCR, the MRD targets could also be measured precisely with this novel method, using the same primer and probe sets as for qPCR.

RESULTS

The already established MRD protocol of qPCR could be transferred to ddPCR and all 17 MRD targets were measured in dilution series reaching comparable Limit of detection levels with both PCR methods.

CONCLUSIONS

With a given qPCR protocol and some experience in conventional MRD monitoring, it is conceivable to transfer the procedure of MRD measurement to ddPCR technology. Our data is in line with other studies which are summarized and discussed here as well to facilitate the transfer of MRD diagnostics to ddPCR.

Optimizing Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Analysis in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation has resulted in a fundamental instrument to guide patient management in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). From a methodological standpoint, MRD is defined as any approach aimed at detecting and possibly quantifying residual neoplastic cells beyond the sensitivity level of cytomorphology. The molecular methods to study MRD in ALL are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based approaches and are the most standardized techniques. However, there are some limitations, and emerging technologies, such as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), seem to have advantages that could improve MRD analysis in ALL patients. Furthermore, other blood components, namely cell-free DNA (cfDNA), appear promising and are also being investigated for their potential role in monitoring tumor burden and response to treatment in hematologic malignancies. Based on the review of the literature and on our own data, we hereby discuss how emerging molecular technologies are helping to refine the molecular monitoring of MRD in ALL and may help to overcome some of the limitations of standard approaches, providing a benefit for the care of patients.

DigiMir Test: Establishing a Novel Pipeline for MiR-371a Quantification Using Droplet Digital PCR in Liquid Biopsies From Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Patients

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common cancers in young-adult male patients aged between 15 and 39 years. Hsa-miR-371a-3p is currently the most reliable biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of these patients non-invasively in liquid biopsies, and it is destined to be introduced in the clinic due to improved performance compared to the classical serum tumor markers available. Current studies have focused on real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) protocols for its determination; still, some challenges remain, since these protocols often require preamplification steps (costly and time-consuming), and report relative levels normalized to a housekeeping microRNA, not always performed the same way. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) shows the promise to overcome these challenges, skipping normalization and preamplifications, but has hardly been explored in the field of TGCTs. In this work, we provide a report of a ddPCR-based pipeline for the quantification of hsa-miR-371a-3p (the DigiMir pipeline) and compare it with two RT-qPCR protocols. A total of 107 plasma samples were investigated in the validation setting. The DigiMir pipeline detected TGCTs in a manner representative of tumor burden, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 100%, respectively, outperforming the combined sensitivity of all three classical serum tumor markers (61.5%). Therefore, in this proof-of-concept investigation, we have shown that the DigiMir pipeline constitutes a new promising methodology to accurately report hsa-miR-371a-3p in the clinical setting.

Droplet Digital PCR: A New View on Minimal Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements has been used as the gold standard for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for >20 years. Recently, new PCR-based technologies have emerged, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which could offer several methodologic advances for MRD monitoring. In the current work, qPCR and ddPCR were compared in an unbiased blinded prospective study (n = 88 measurements) and in a retrospective study with selected critical low positive samples (n = 65 measurements). The former included flow cytometry (Flow; n = 31 measurements) as a third MRD detection method. Published guidelines (qPCR) and the latest, revised evaluation criteria (ie, ddPCR, Flow) have been applied for data analysis. The prospective study shows that ddPCR outperforms qPCR with a significantly better quantitative limit of detection and sensitivity. The number of critical MRD estimates below quantitative limit was reduced by sixfold and by threefold in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of quantitative values between ddPCR and Flow was higher than between ddPCR and qPCR, probably because ddPCR and Flow are absolute quantification methods independent of the diagnostic sample, unlike qPCR. In summary, our data highlight the advantages of ddPCR as a more precise and sensitive technology that could be used to refine response monitoring in ALL.

Digital PCR for Minimal Residual Disease Quantitation Using Immunoglobulin/T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Proposed Analytic Algorithm

In minimal residual disease (MRD), where there are exceedingly low target copy numbers, digital PCR (dPCR) can improve MRD quantitation. However, standards for dPCR MRD interpretation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia are lacking. Here, for immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor-based MRD, we propose an objective, statistics-based analytic algorithm. In 161 postinduction samples from 79 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MRD was performed by dPCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the same markers and primer-probe sets. The dPCR raw data were analyzed by using an automated algorithm. dPCR and qPCR results were highly concordant (P < 0.0001): 98% (50 of 51) of qPCR positive were positive by dPCR, whereas 95% (61 of 64) of qPCR negative results were also negative by dPCR. For MRD quantitation, both qPCR and dPCR were tightly correlated (R² = 0.94). Using more DNA (1 μg × 7 versus 630 ng × 3), dPCR improved sensitivity of MRD quantitation by one log₁₀ (median MRD positive cutoff 1.6 × 10^-5). With dPCR, 83% (29 of 35) of positive-not-quantifiable results by qPCR could be assigned positive/negative MRD status. Seven replicates of tested samples and negative controls were optimal. Compared with qPCR, dPCR could improve MRD sensitivity by one log₁₀. We proposed an automatable, statistics-based algorithm that minimized interoperator variance for dPCR MRD.

Minimal Residual Disease Analysis by Monitoring Immunoglobulin and T-Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangements by Quantitative PCR and Droplet Digital PCR

Analysis of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is the gold standard for sensitive and accurate minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring; it has been extensively standardized and guidelines have been developed within the EuroMRD consortium ( www.euromrd.org ). However, new generations of PCR-based methods are standing out as potential alternatives to RQ-PCR, such as digital PCR technology (dPCR), the third-generation implementation of conventional PCR, which has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of RQ-PCR such as allowing the absolute quantification of nucleic acid targets without the need for a calibration curve. During the last years, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology has been compared to RQ-PCR in several hematologic malignancies showing its proficiency for MRD analysis. So far, no established guidelines for ddPCR MRD analysis and data interpretation have been defined and its potential is still under investigation. However, a major standardization effort is underway within the EuroMRD consortium ( www.euromrd.org ) for future application of ddPCR in standard clinical practice.

Use of BTK inhibitors with special focus on ibrutinib in Waldenström macroglobulinemia: an expert panel opinion statement

The pivotal role that ibrutinib plays in the management of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is undisputed but there are ongoing questions regarding its positioning in the therapeutic algorithm of WM as well as in some peculiar clinical situations. A panel of experts from Italy was convened to provide real world recommendations on the use of BTK inhibitors in lymphoproliferative diseases in general, and in patients with WM in particular. This position paper represents the panel's collective analysis, evaluation, and opinions and is made up of a series of questions frequently asked by practicing clinicians and answers based on currently available evidence. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Droplet Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Monitoring in Diagnostic Routine: Ready to Start?

Simple Summary

The introduction to clinical practice of a treatment-free remission approach in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with a stable deep molecular response highlighted how crucial it is to monitor the molecular levels of BCR–ABL1 as accurately and precisely as possible. In this context, the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) presents an alternative methodology for such quantification. To hypothesize the introduction of this technology in routine practice, we performed a multicentric study that compares ddPCR with the standard methodology currently used. Our results demonstrate that the use of ddPCR in clinical practice is feasible and could be beneficial.

Abstract

BCR–ABL1 mRNA levels represent the key molecular marker for the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is currently the standard method to monitor it. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged to provide a more precise detection of MRD. To hypothesize the use of ddPCR in clinical practice, we designed a multicentric study to evaluate the potential value of ddPCR in the diagnostic routine. Thirty-seven RNA samples from CML patients and five from healthy donors were analyzed using both ddPCR QXDx^TMBCR-ABL %IS Kit and LabNet-approved RT-qPCR methodologies in three different Italian laboratories. Our results show that ddPCR has a good agreement with RT-qPCR, but it is more precise to quantify BCR–ABL1 transcript levels. Furthermore, we did not find differences between duplicate or quadruplicate analysis in terms of BCR–ABL1% IS values. Droplet digital PCR could be confidently introduced into the diagnostic routine as a complement to the RT-qPCR.

Response-Adapted Postinduction Strategy in Patients With Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma: The FOLL12 Study

PURPOSE

We compared 2 years of rituximab maintenance (RM) with a response-adapted postinduction approach in patients with follicular lymphoma who responded to induction immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned treatment-naïve, advanced-stage, high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma patients to receive standard RM or a response-adapted postinduction approach on the basis of metabolic response and molecular assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). The experimental arm used three types of postinduction therapies: for complete metabolic response (CMR) and MRD-negative patients, observation; for CMR and MRD-positive (end of induction or follow-up) patients, four doses of rituximab (one per week, maximum three courses) until MRD-negative; and for non-CMR patients, one dose of ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by standard RM. The study was designed as noninferiority trial with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary end point.

RESULTS

Overall, 807 patients were randomly assigned. After a median follow-up of 53 months (range 1-92 months), patients in the standard arm had a significantly better PFS than those in the experimental arm (3-year PFS 86% v 72%; P < .001). The better PFS of the standard vs experimental arm was confirmed in all the study subgroups except non-CMR patients (n = 65; P = .274). The 3-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 96 to 99) and 97% (95% CI, 95 to 99) in the reference and experimental arms, respectively (P = .238).

CONCLUSION

A metabolic and molecular response-adapted therapy as assessed in the FOLL12 study was associated with significantly inferior PFS compared with 2-year RM. The better efficacy of standard RM was confirmed in the subgroup analysis and particularly for patients achieving both CMR and MRD-negative.

Interlaboratory Analytical Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Strategy for Clonotypic Assessment and Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma

CONTEXT.—

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma, although validated technologies are limited.

OBJECTIVE.—

To standardize the performance of the LymphoTrack next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays (Invivoscribe), targeting clonal immunoglobulin rearrangements, in order to reproduce the detection of tumor clonotypes and MRD quantitation in myeloma.

DESIGN.—

The quantification ability of the assay was evaluated through serial dilution experiments. Paired samples from 101 patients were tested by LymphoTrack, using Sanger sequencing and EuroFlow's next-generation flow (NGF) assay as validated references for diagnostic and follow-up evaluation, respectively. MRD studies using LymphoTrack were performed in parallel at 2 laboratories to evaluate reproducibility.

RESULTS.—

Sensitivity was set as 1.3 tumor cells per total number of input cells. Clonality was confirmed in 99% and 100% of cases with Sanger and NGS, respectively, showing great concordance (97.9%), although several samples had minor discordances in the nucleotide sequence of rearrangements. Parallel NGS was performed in 82 follow-up cases, achieving a median sensitivity of 0.001%, while for NGF, median sensitivity was 0.0002%. Reproducibility of LymphoTrack-based MRD studies (85.4%) and correlation with NGF (R2 > 0.800) were high. Bland-Altman tests showed highly significant levels of agreement between flow and sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Taken together, we have shown that LymphoTrack is a suitable strategy for clonality detection and MRD evaluation, with results comparable to gold standard procedures.

Analytical Quality Controls for ddPCR Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a promising technique for absolute quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but there is no comprehensive quality assurance program to enable its application in clinical laboratories. Current guidelines for real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays targeting immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor (Ig/TCR) gene rearrangements needed adaptation for ddPCR to cover droplet generation, intraassay variation, and interassay variation in the absence of standard curves.

Methods

Six qPCR MRD assays for Ig/TCR gene rearrangements and a standard albumin control gene assay were migrated to a ddPCR platform and used to test 82 remission samples from 6 patients with ALL. Three analytical quality controls (QC) were developed and evaluated for ddPCR MRD detection.

Results

Analytical QC for droplet number generation (DN-QC), for albumin ddPCR assay performance (Alb-QC) and for patient-specific marker assay performance (PS-QC) were established with pass/fail limits and corresponding QC rules. Compared to established qPCRs, the ddPCR assays had comparable sensitivity and quantitative range. Overall, there was close agreement (91%) of MRD results between qPCR and ddPCR (κ = 0.86, P &lt; 0.0001) and stronger concordance in 32 quantifiable samples (R2 = 0.97, P &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusions

The use of this newly developed quality control system for ddPCR MRD testing avoids the need to repeat standard curves and provides reliable results comparable to standardized qPCR methods for MRD detection in ALL.

Toward Pediatric T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Stratification Based on Minimal Disseminated Disease and NOTCH1/FBXW7 Status

While outcome for pediatric T lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL) has improved with acute leukemia-type therapy, survival after relapse remains rare. Few prognostic markers have been identified: NOTCH1 and/or FBXW7 (N/F) mutations identify good prognosis T-LL and high-level minimal disseminated disease (MDD) is reported to be of poor prognosis. We evaluated MDD and/or MRD status by 8-color flow cytometry and/or digital droplet PCR in 82 pediatric T-LL treated according to the EURO-LB02 prednisone reference arm. Both techniques gave identical results for values ≥0.1%, allowing compilation. Unlike historical studies, an MDD threshold of 1% had no prognostic significance. The 54% (42/78) of patients with MDD ≥0.1% had a relatively favorable outcome (5-y overall survival [OS] 97.6% versus 80.6%, P = 0.015, 5-y event-free-survival [EFS] 95.2% versus 80.6%, P = 0.049). MDD lower than 0.1% had no impact in N/F mutated T-LL, but identified the N/F germline patient with a high risk of relapse. Combining oncogenetic and MDD status identified 86% of patients (n = 49) with an excellent outcome and 14% of N/F germline/MDD <0.1% patients (n = 8) with poor prognosis (5y-OS 95.9% versus 37.5%, P < 0.001; 5y-EFS 93.9% versus 37.5%, P < 0.001). If confirmed by prospective studies, MDD and N/F mutational status would allow identification of a subset of patients who merit consideration for alternative front-line treatment.

Targeted locus amplification to detect molecular markers in mantle cell and follicular lymphoma

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by PCR methods is a strong and standardized predictor of clinical outcome in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). However, about 20% of MCL and 40% of FL patients lack a reliable molecular marker, being thus not eligible for MRD studies. Recently, targeted locus amplification (TLA), a next‐generation sequencing (NGS) method based on the physical proximity of DNA sequences for target selection, identified novel gene rearrangements in leukemia. The aim of this study was to test TLA in MCL and FL diagnostic samples lacking a classical, PCR‐detectable, t(11; 14) MTC (BCL1/IGH), or t(14; 18) major breakpoint region and minor cluster region (BCL2/IGH) rearrangements. Overall, TLA was performed on 20 MCL bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) primary samples and on 20 FL BM, identifying a novel BCL1 or BCL2/IGH breakpoint in 16 MCL and 8 FL patients (80% and 40%, respectively). These new breakpoints (named BCL1‐TLA and BCL2‐TLA) were validated by ASO primers design and compared as MRD markers to classical IGH rearrangements in eight MCL: overall, MRD results by BCL1‐TLA were superimposable (R Pearson = 0.76) to the standardized IGH‐based approach. Moreover, MRD by BCL2‐TLA reached good sensitivity levels also in FL and was predictive of a primary refractory case. In conclusion, this study offers the proof of principle that TLA is a promising and reliable NGS‐based technology for the identification of novel molecular markers, suitable for further MRD analysis in previously not traceable MCL and FL patients.

SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery

Since the publication of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer's (SITC) original cancer immunotherapy biomarkers resource document, there have been remarkable breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, in particular the development and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, engineered cellular therapies, and tumor vaccines to unleash antitumor immune activity. The most notable feature of these breakthroughs is the achievement of durable clinical responses in some patients, enabling long-term survival. These durable responses have been noted in tumor types that were not previously considered immunotherapy-sensitive, suggesting that all patients with cancer may have the potential to benefit from immunotherapy. However, a persistent challenge in the field is the fact that only a minority of patients respond to immunotherapy, especially those therapies that rely on endogenous immune activation such as checkpoint inhibitors and vaccination due to the complex and heterogeneous immune escape mechanisms which can develop in each patient. Therefore, the development of robust biomarkers for each immunotherapy strategy, enabling rational patient selection and the design of precise combination therapies, is key for the continued success and improvement of immunotherapy. In this document, we summarize and update established biomarkers, guidelines, and regulatory considerations for clinical immune biomarker development, discuss well-known and novel technologies for biomarker discovery and validation, and provide tools and resources that can be used by the biomarker research community to facilitate the continued development of immuno-oncology and aid in the goal of durable responses in all patients.

Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene generation as a consequence of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) rearrangement. The identification of the BCR-ABL1 transcript was of critical importance for both CML diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. In this review, we report the recent advances in the CML MRD monitoring based on RNA, DNA and protein analysis. The detection of the BCR-ABL1 transcript by the quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard method, but other systems based on digital PCR or on GeneXpert technology have been developed. In the last years, DNA-based assays showed high sensitivity and specificity, and flow cytometric approaches for the detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein have also been tested. Recently, new MRD monitoring systems based on the detection of molecular markers other than the BCR-ABL1 fusion were proposed. These approaches, such as the identification of CD26+ leukemic stem cells, microRNAs and mitochondrial DNA mutations, just remain preliminary and need to be implemented. In the precision medicine era, the constant improvement of the CML MRD monitoring practice could allow clinicians to choose the best therapeutic algorithm and a more accurate selection of CML patients eligible for the tyrosine kinase inhibitors discontinuation.

Droplet Digital PCR Quantification of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Follow-up Samples From Four Prospective Trials of the European MCL Network

Minimal residual disease (MRD) has been increasingly investigated in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), including for individual therapeutic stratification and pre-emptive treatment in clinical trials. Although patient/allele specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of IGH or BCL1-IGH clonal markers is the gold-standard method, its reliance on a standard curve for relative quantification limits quantification of low-level positivity within the 1E-4 to 1E-5 range; over half of positive MRD samples after treatment fall below the quantitative range (BQR) of the standard curve. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), in contrast, allows absolute quantification, including for samples with no baseline determination of tumor infiltration by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC), avoiding the need for a reference standard curve. Using updated, optimized, ddPCR criteria we compared it with qPCR in 416 MRD samples (and with MFC in 63), with over-representation (61%) of BQR results by qPCR, from a total of 166 patients from four prospective MCL clinical trials. ddPCR, qPCR and MFC gave comparable results in MRD samples with at least 0.01% (1E-4) positivity. ddPCR was preferable to qPCR since it provided more robust quantification at positivity between 1E-4 and 1E-5. Amongst 240 BQR samples with duplicate or triplicate analysis, 39% were positive by ddPCR, 49% negative and only 12% remained positive below quantifiable ddPCR limits. The prognostic relevance of ddPCR is currently under assessment in the context of prospective trials within the European MCL Network.

Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: How Molecular Tools May Drive Therapeutic Approaches

More than 15 years ago, imatinib entered into the clinical practice as a "magic bullet"; from that point on, the prognosis of patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) became comparable to that of aged-matched healthy subjects. The aims of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are for complete hematological response after 3 months of treatment, complete cytogenetic response after 6 months, and a reduction of the molecular disease of at least 3 logs after 12 months. Patients who do not reach their goal can switch to another TKI. Thus, the molecular monitoring of response is the main consideration of management of CML patients. Moreover, cases in deep and persistent molecular response can tempt the physician to interrupt treatment, and this "dream" is possible due to the quantitative PCR. After great international effort, today the BCR-ABL1 expression obtained in each laboratory is standardized and expressed as "international scale." This aim has been reached after the establishment of the EUTOS program (in Europe) and the LabNet network (in Italy), the platforms where biologists meet clinicians. In the field of quantitative PCR, the digital PCR is now a new and promising, sensitive and accurate tool. Some authors reported that digital PCR is able to better classify patients in precise "molecular classes," which could lead to a better identification of those cases that will benefit from the interruption of therapy. In addition, digital PCR can be used to identify a point mutation in the ABL1 domain, mutations that are often responsible for the TKI resistance. In the field of resistance, a prominent role is played by the NGS that enables identification of any mutation in ABL1 domain, even at sub-clonal levels. This manuscript reviews how the molecular tools can lead the management of CML patients, focusing on the more recent technical advances.

New Molecular Technologies for Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in B-Cell Lymphoid Malignancies

The clearance of malignant clonal cells significantly correlates with clinical outcomes in many hematologic malignancies. Accurate and high throughput tools for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection are needed to overcome some drawbacks of standard molecular techniques; such novel tools have allowed for higher sensitivity analyses and more precise stratification of patients, based on molecular response to therapy. In this review, we depict the recently introduced digital PCR and next-generation sequencing technologies, describing their current application for MRD monitoring in lymphoproliferative disorders. Moreover, we illustrate the feasibility of these new technologies to test less invasive and more patient-friendly tissues sources, such as "liquid biopsy".

A phase 2 study of rituximab, bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone for first-line treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma

We present results of a prospective, multicenter, phase II study evaluating rituximab, bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone as first-line treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma aged 65 years or older. A total of 74 patients were enrolled (median age, 73 years). Patients received a maximum of six cycles of treatment at 28-day intervals. The primary objective was to achieve an 18-month progression-free survival rate of 65% or higher. Secondary objectives were to evaluate toxicity and the prognostic impact of mantle cell lymphoma prognostic index, Ki67 expression, [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and molecular minimal residual disease, in peripheral blood or bone marrow. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the 24-month progression-free survival rate was 70%, hence the primary objective was reached. After six cycles of treatment, 91% (54/59) of responding patients were analyzed for peripheral blood residual disease and 87% of these (47/54) were negative. Four-year overall survival rates of the patients who did not have or had detectable molecular residual disease in the blood at completion of treatment were 86.6% and 28.6%, respectively (P<0.0001). Neither the mantle cell lymphoma index, nor fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography nor Ki67 positivity (cut off of ≥30%) showed a prognostic impact for survival. Hematologic grade 3-4 toxicities were mainly neutropenia (51%), thrombocytopenia (35%) and lymphopenia (65%). Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities were mainly fatigue (18.5%), neuropathy (15%) and infections. In conclusion, the tested treatment regimen is active as frontline therapy in older patients with mantle cell lymphoma, with manageable toxicity. Minimal residual disease status after induction could serve as an early predictor of survival in mantle cell lymphoma. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 01457144.