Subcellular Optogenetic Stimulation Platform for Studying Activity-Dependent Axon Myelination In Vitro

Application of Optogenetics for Muscle Cells and Stem Cells

This chapter describes the current progress of basic research, and potential therapeutic applications primarily focused on the optical manipulation of muscle cells and neural stem cells using microbial rhodopsin as a light-sensitive molecule. Since the contractions of skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle cells are mainly regulated through their membrane potential, several studies have been demonstrated to up- or downregulate the muscle contraction directly or indirectly using optogenetic actuators or silencers with defined stimulation patterns and intensities. Light-dependent oscillation of membrane potential also facilitates the maturation of myocytes with the development of T tubules and sarcomere structures, tandem arrays of minimum contractile units consists of contractile proteins and cytoskeletal proteins. Optogenetics has been applied to various stem cells and multipotent/pluripotent cells such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to generate light-sensitive neurons and to facilitate neuroscience. The chronic optical stimulation of the channelrhodopsin-expressing neural stem cells facilitates their neural differentiation. There are potential therapeutic applications of optogenetics in cardiac pacemaking, muscle regeneration/maintenance, locomotion recovery for the treatment of muscle paralysis due to motor neuron diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Optogenetics would also facilitate maturation, network integration of grafted neurons, and improve the microenvironment around them when applied to stem cells.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Optogenetic Stimulation of Glia versus Neurons in Myelination

Increasing evidence demonstrates that optogenetics contributes to the regulation of brain behavior, cognition, and physiology, particularly during myelination, potentially allowing for the bidirectional modulation of specific cell lines with spatiotemporal accuracy. However, the type of cell to be targeted, namely, glia vs neurons, and the degree to which optogenetically induced cell activity can regulate myelination during the development of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are still underexplored. Herein, we report the comparison of optogenetic stimulation (OS) of Schwann cells (SCs) and motor neurons (MNs) for activation of myelination in the PNS. Capitalizing on these optogenetic tools, we confirmed that the formation of the myelin sheath was initially promoted more by OS of calcium translocating channelrhodopsin (CatCh)-transfected SCs than by OS of transfected MNs at 7 days in vitro (DIV). Additionally, the level of myelination was substantially enhanced even until 14 DIV. Surprisingly, after OS of SCs, > 91.1% ± 5.9% of cells expressed myelin basic protein, while that of MNs was 67.8% ± 6.1%. The potent effect of OS of SCs was revealed by the increased thickness of the myelin sheath at 14 DIV. Thus, the OS of SCs could highly accelerate myelination, while the OS of MNs only somewhat promoted myelination, indicating a clear direction for the optogenetic application of unique cell types for initiating and promoting myelination. Together, our findings support the importance of precise cell type selection for use in optogenetics, which in turn can be broadly applied to overcome the limitations of optogenetics after injury.

Modulation of Neural Activity for Myelination in the Central Nervous System

Electrical stimulation has been playing a significant role in revealing various functions and mechanisms of the nervous system. It is no different for myelination, a process in which oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system (CNS) or Schwann Cells in the peripheral nerve system (PNS) wrap around axons to provide an insulating layer in vitro and in vivo. It has been widely recognized that the myelin sheath accelerates axon signal conduction and provides neuroprotection. Recent studies have begun to reveal its role in plasticity. The major mechanism that enables this process is activity-dependent myelination - the phenomenon where neuronal activity supports oligodendrocyte maturation and myelin sheath formation. In light of recent discoveries, a better understanding of this phenomenon has a potential to provide therapeutic targets for not only demyelinating diseases, but also psychiatric disorders. There is a growing need for experimental platforms capable of dissecting the effect of neural activity on myelination in health and disease. The effect of neural activity is commonly studied by comparing the myelination levels in cultures with neurons of low and high activity. Electrical stimulation is particularly well suited as a method of inducing neural activity in these systems. In this review, we describe in vitro platforms for studying activity-dependent myelination, which utilize neuron stimulation via electrical field. We also discuss stimulation profiles, as well as the alternatives to electrical stimulation in the context of regular, compartmentalized, and organotypic co-cultures.