Considerations for Imaging and Analyzing Neural Structures by STED Microscopy

Fluorescence microscopy shadow imaging for neuroscience

Fluorescence microscopy remains one of the single most widely applied experimental approaches in neuroscience and beyond and is continuously evolving to make it easier and more versatile. The success of the approach is based on synergistic developments in imaging technologies and fluorophore labeling strategies that have allowed it to greatly diversify and be used across preparations for addressing structure as well as function. Yet, while targeted labeling strategies are a key strength of fluorescence microscopy, they reciprocally impose general limitations on the possible types of experiments and analyses. One recent development that overcomes some of these limitations is fluorescence microscopy shadow imaging, where membrane-bound cellular structures remain unlabeled while the surrounding extracellular space is made to fluoresce to provide a negative contrast shadow image. When based on super-resolution STED microscopy, the technique in effect provides a positive image of the extracellular space geometry and entire neuropil in the field of view. Other noteworthy advantages include the near elimination of the adverse effects of photobleaching and toxicity in live imaging, exhaustive and homogeneous labeling across the preparation, and the ability to apply and adjust the label intensity on the fly. Shadow imaging is gaining popularity and has been applied on its own or combined with conventional positive labeling to visualize cells and synaptic proteins in their parenchymal context. Here, we highlight the inherent limitations of fluorescence microscopy and conventional labeling and contrast these against the pros and cons of recent shadow imaging approaches. Our aim is to describe the brief history and current trajectory of the shadow imaging technique in the neuroscience field, and to draw attention to its ease of application and versatility.

Super-resolution STED microscopy in live brain tissue

STED microscopy is one of several fluorescence microscopy techniques that permit imaging at higher spatial resolution than what the diffraction-limit of light dictates. STED imaging is unique among these super-resolution modalities in being a beam-scanning microscopy technique based on confocal or 2-photon imaging, which provides the advantage of superior optical sectioning in thick samples. Compared to the other super-resolution techniques that are based on widefield microscopy, this makes STED particularly suited for imaging inside live brain tissue, such as in slices or in vivo. Notably, the 50 nm resolution provided by STED microscopy enables analysis of neural morphologies that conventional confocal and 2-photon microscopy approaches cannot resolve, including all-important synaptic structures. Over the course of the last 20 years, STED microscopy has undergone extensive developments towards ever more versatile use, and has facilitated remarkable neurophysiological discoveries. The technique is still not widely adopted for live tissue imaging, even though one of its particular strengths is exactly in resolving the nanoscale dynamics of synaptic structures in brain tissue, as well as in addressing the complex morphologies of glial cells, and revealing the intricate structure of the brain extracellular space. Not least, live tissue STED microscopy has so far hardly been applied in settings of pathophysiology, though also here it shows great promise for providing new insights. This review outlines the technical advantages of STED microscopy for imaging in live brain tissue, and highlights key neurobiological findings brought about by the technique.

Current Techniques for Investigating the Brain Extracellular Space

The brain extracellular space (ECS) is a continuous reticular compartment that lies between the cells of the brain. It is vast in extent relative to its resident cells, yet, at the same time the nano- to micrometer dimensions of its channels and reservoirs are commonly finer than the smallest cellular structures. Our conventional view of this compartment as largely static and of secondary importance for brain function is rapidly changing, and its active dynamic roles in signaling and metabolite clearance have come to the fore. It is further emerging that ECS microarchitecture is highly heterogeneous and dynamic and that ECS geometry and diffusional properties directly modulate local diffusional transport, down to the nanoscale around individual synapses. The ECS can therefore be considered an extremely complex and diverse compartment, where numerous physiological events are unfolding in parallel on spatial and temporal scales that span orders of magnitude, from milliseconds to hours, and from nanometers to centimeters. To further understand the physiological roles of the ECS and identify new ones, researchers can choose from a wide array of experimental techniques, which differ greatly in their applicability to a given sample and the type of data they produce. Here, we aim to provide a basic introduction to the available experimental techniques that have been applied to address the brain ECS, highlighting their main characteristics. We include current gold-standard techniques, as well as emerging cutting-edge modalities based on recent super-resolution microscopy. It is clear that each technique comes with unique strengths and limitations and that no single experimental method can unravel the unknown physiological roles of the brain ECS on its own.