1
|
Fischer AL, Tichy A, Kokot J, Hoerschinger VJ, Wild RF, Riccabona JR, Loeffler JR, Waibl F, Quoika PK, Gschwandtner P, Forli S, Ward AB, Liedl KR, Zacharias M, Fernández-Quintero ML. The Role of Force Fields and Water Models in Protein Folding and Unfolding Dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 2024; 20:2321-2333. [PMID: 38373307 PMCID: PMC10938642 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Protein folding is a fascinating, not fully understood phenomenon in biology. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are an invaluable tool to study conformational changes in atomistic detail, including folding and unfolding processes of proteins. However, the accuracy of the conformational ensembles derived from MD simulations inevitably relies on the quality of the underlying force field in combination with the respective water model. Here, we investigate protein folding, unfolding, and misfolding of fast-folding proteins by examining different force fields with their recommended water models, i.e., ff14SB with the TIP3P model and ff19SB with the OPC model. To this end, we generated long conventional MD simulations highlighting the perks and pitfalls of these setups. Using Markov state models, we defined kinetically independent conformational substates and emphasized their distinct characteristics, as well as their corresponding state probabilities. Surprisingly, we found substantial differences in thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding, depending on the combination of the protein force field and water model, originating primarily from the different water models. These results emphasize the importance of carefully choosing the force field and the respective water model as they determine the accuracy of the observed dynamics of folding events. Thus, the findings support the hypothesis that the water model is at least equally important as the force field and hence needs to be considered in future studies investigating protein dynamics and folding in all areas of biophysics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Lena
M. Fischer
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anna Tichy
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Janik Kokot
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Valentin J. Hoerschinger
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Robert F. Wild
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jakob R. Riccabona
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johannes R. Loeffler
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Franz Waibl
- Department
of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH
Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick K. Quoika
- Center
for Protein Assemblies (CPA), Physics Department, Chair of Theoretical
Biophysics, Technical University of Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Stefano Forli
- Department
of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Andrew B. Ward
- Department
of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Klaus R. Liedl
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Zacharias
- Center
for Protein Assemblies (CPA), Physics Department, Chair of Theoretical
Biophysics, Technical University of Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Monica L. Fernández-Quintero
- Institute
for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular
Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University
of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kastritis PL, van Dijk ADJ, Bonvin AMJJ. Explicit treatment of water molecules in data-driven protein-protein docking: the solvated HADDOCKing approach. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 819:355-374. [PMID: 22183547 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Water molecules are active components in, literally, every biochemical event, forming hydrogen bonds, filling cavities, and mediating interactions with other (bio)molecules. Therefore, solvent drastically affects the kinetics and thermodynamics of numerous cellular events, including protein-protein interactions. While docking techniques are becoming successful in predicting the three-dimensional structure of protein-protein complexes, they are still limited in accounting explicitly for water in the binding process. HADDOCK is one of the few programs so far that can explicitly deal with water molecules during docking. Its solvated docking protocol starts from hydrated molecules, and a fraction of the interfacial water is subsequently removed from the docked models in a biased Monte Carlo procedure. The Monte Carlo-based removal is based on interfacial amino acid-water contact propensities derived from a dataset of high-resolution crystal structures of protein-protein complexes. In this chapter, this solvated docking protocol is described and associated methodological aspects are illustrated through an application example. It is shown that, although docking results do not always improve when the solvated docking protocol is applied, scoring is improved and the positions of buried water molecules in an interface are correctly predicted. Therefore, by identifying important water molecules, solvated docking can aid the development of novel inhibitors of protein-protein complexes that might be better accommodated at an interface.
Collapse
|