Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships

Rapid microsphere-assisted peptide screening (MAPS) of promiscuous MHCII-binding peptides in Zika virus envelope protein

Despite promising developments in computational tools, peptide-class II MHC (MHCII) binding predictors continue to lag behind their peptide-class I MHC counterparts. Consequently, peptide-MHCII binding is often evaluated experimentally using competitive binding assays, which tend to sacrifice throughput for quantitative binding detail. Here, we developed a high-throughput semiquantitative peptide-MHCII screening strategy termed microsphere-assisted peptide screening (MAPS) that aims to balance the accuracy of competitive binding assays with the throughput of computational tools. Using MAPS, we screened a peptide library from Zika virus envelope (E) protein for binding to four common MHCII alleles (DR1, DR4, DR7, DR15). Interestingly, MAPS revealed a significant overlap between peptides that promiscuously bind multiple MHCII alleles and antibody neutralization sites. This overlap was also observed for rotavirus outer capsid glycoprotein VP7, suggesting a deeper relationship between B cell and CD4+ T cell specificity which can facilitate the design of broadly protective vaccines to Zika and other viruses.

Construction and Screening of an Antigen-Derived Peptide Library Displayed on Yeast Cell Surface for CD4+ T Cell Epitope Identification

Antigenic peptides (termed T cell epitopes) are assembled with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and presented on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for T cell recognition. T cells engage these peptide-MHCs using T cell receptors (TCRs). Because T cell epitopes determine the specificity of a T cell immune response, their prediction and identification are important steps in developing peptide-based vaccines and immunotherapies. In recent years, a number of computational methods have been developed to predict T cell epitopes by evaluating peptide-MHC binding; however, the success of these methods has been limited for MHC class II (MHCII) due to the structural complexity of MHCII antigen presentation. Moreover, while peptide-MHC binding is a prerequisite for a T cell epitope, it alone is not sufficient. Therefore, T cell epitope identification requires further functional verification of the MHC-binding peptide using professional APCs, which are difficult to isolate, expand, and maintain. To address these issues, we have developed a facile, accurate, and high-throughput method for T cell epitope mapping by screening antigen-derived peptide libraries in complex with MHC protein displayed on yeast cell surface. Here, we use hemagglutinin and influenza A virus X31/A/Aichi/68 as examples to describe the key steps in identification of CD4+ T cell epitopes from a single antigenic protein and the entire genome of a pathogen, respectively. Methods for single-chain peptide MHC vector design, yeast surface display, peptide library generation in Escherichia coli, and functional screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are discussed.

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting HLA-Peptide Binding Activity

As major histocompatibility complexes in humans, the human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) have important functions to present antigen peptides onto T-cell receptors for immunological recognition and responses. Interpreting and predicting HLA–peptide binding are important to study T-cell epitopes, immune reactions, and the mechanisms of adverse drug reactions. We review different types of machine learning methods and tools that have been used for HLA–peptide binding prediction. We also summarize the descriptors based on which the HLA–peptide binding prediction models have been constructed and discuss the limitation and challenges of the current methods. Lastly, we give a future perspective on the HLA–peptide binding prediction method based on network analysis.

Structural basis for the differential classification of HLA-A*6802 and HLA-A*6801 into the A2 and A3 supertypes

High polymorphism is one of the most important features of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, which were initially classified by serotyping but have recently been re-grouped into supertypes according to their peptide presentation properties. Two relatively prevalent HLA alleles HLA-A*6801 and HLA-A*6802, are classified into the same serotype HLA-A68. However, based on their distinct peptide-binding characteristics, HLA-A*6801 is grouped into A3 supertype, whereas HLA-A*6802 belongs to A2 supertype, similar to HLA-A*0201. Thusfar, the structural basis of the different supertype definitions of these serotyping-identical HLA alleles remains largely unknown. Herein, we determined the structures of HLA-A*6801 and HLA-A*6802 presenting three typical A3 and A2 supertype-restricted peptides, respectively. The binding capabilities of these peptides to HLA-A*6801, HLA-A*6802, and HLA-A*0201 were analyzed. These data indicate that the similar conformations of the residues within the F pocket contribute to close-related peptide binding features of HLA-A*6802 and HLA-A*0201. However, the overall structure and the peptide conformation of HLA-A*6802 are more similar to HLA-A*6801 rather than HLA-A*0201 which illuminates the similar serotype grouping of HLA-A*6802 and HLA-A*6801. Our findings are helpful for understanding the divergent peptide presentation and virus-specific CTL responses impacted by MHC micropolymorphisms and also elucidate the molecular basis of HLA supertype definitions.

Predicting HLA class I non-permissive amino acid residues substitutions

Prediction of peptide binding to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules is essential to a wide range of clinical entities from vaccine design to stem cell transplant compatibility. Here we present a new structure-based methodology that applies robust computational tools to model peptide-HLA (p-HLA) binding interactions. The method leverages the structural conservation observed in p-HLA complexes to significantly reduce the search space and calculate the system’s binding free energy. This approach is benchmarked against existing p-HLA complexes and the prediction performance is measured against a library of experimentally validated peptides. The effect on binding activity across a large set of high-affinity peptides is used to investigate amino acid mismatches reported as high-risk factors in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Predicting peptide binding affinities to MHC molecules using a modified semi-empirical scoring function

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) plays an important role in the human immune system. The MHC is involved in the antigen presentation system assisting T cells to identify foreign or pathogenic proteins. However, an MHC molecule binding a self-peptide may incorrectly trigger an immune response and cause an autoimmune disease, such as multiple sclerosis. Understanding the molecular mechanism of this process will greatly assist in determining the aetiology of various diseases and in the design of effective drugs. In the present study, we have used the Fresno semi-empirical scoring function and modify the approach to the prediction of peptide-MHC binding by using open-source and public domain software. We apply the method to HLA class II alleles DR15, DR1, and DR4, and the HLA class I allele HLA A2. Our analysis shows that using a large set of binding data and multiple crystal structures improves the predictive capability of the method. The performance of the method is also shown to be correlated to the structural similarity of the crystal structures used. We have exposed some of the obstacles faced by structure-based prediction methods and proposed possible solutions to those obstacles. It is envisaged that these obstacles need to be addressed before the performance of structure-based methods can be on par with the sequence-based methods.

Predicting peptide binding to Major Histocompatibility Complex molecules

The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) constitutes an important part of the human immune system. During infection, pathogenic proteins are processed into peptide fragments by the antigen processing machinery. These peptides bind to MHC molecules and the MHC-peptide complex is then transported to the cell membrane where it elicits an immune response via T-cell binding. Understanding the molecular mechanism of this process will greatly assist in determining the aetiology of various diseases and in the design of effective drugs. One of the most challenging aspects of this area of research is understanding the specificity and sensitivity of the binding process. An empirical approach to the problem is unfeasible as there are over 512 billion potential binding peptides for each MHC molecule. Computational approaches offer the promise of predicting peptide binding, thus dramatically reducing the number of peptides proceeding to experimental verification. Various bioinformatic approaches have been developed to predict whether or not a particular peptide will bind to a particular MHC allele. Currently, peptide binding prediction methods can be categorised into three major groups: motif- and scoring matrix-based methods, artificial intelligence- (AI-) based methods, and structure-based methods. The first two are sequence-based approaches and are generally based on common sequence motifs in peptides known to bind to MHC molecules. The structure-based approach concerns the structural features and the distribution of energy between the binding peptide and the MHC molecule. Although knowledge of the molecular structure of the MHC molecules is expected to lead to better predictions of peptide binding, the development of structure-based methods has been relatively slow compared to sequence-based methods. Comparisons of various methods showed that the best sequence-based methods significantly outperform structure-based methods. This may be improved by producing more structures and binding data desperately needed by many alleles, especially class II molecules. On the other hand, the large number of verification methods and indicators used by structure-based studies hinders critical evaluation of the methods. Adopting commonly used assessment procedures can demonstrate the relative performance of structure-based methods in a straightforward comparison with other methods. This review provides an overview of current methods for predicting peptide binding to the MHC, with a focus on structure-based methods, and explores the potential for future development in this area.