Computational approaches to peptide identification via tandem MS

Visualizing the agreement of peptide assignments between different search engines

There is a trend in the analysis of shotgun proteomics data that aims to combine information from multiple search engines to increase the number of peptide annotations in an experiment. Typically, the degree of search engine complementarity and search engine agreement is visually illustrated by means of Venn diagrams that present the findings of a database search on the level of the nonredundant peptide annotations. We argue this practice to be not fit-for-purpose since the diagrams do not take into account and often conceal the information on complementarity and agreement at the level of the spectrum identification. We promote a new type of visualization that provides insight on the peptide sequence agreement at the level of the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) as a measure of consensus between two search engines with nominal outcomes. We applied the visualizations and percentage sequence agreement to an in-house data set of our benchmark organism, Caenorhabditis elegans, and illustrated that when assessing the agreement between search engine, one should disentangle the notion of PSM confidence and PSM identity. The visualizations presented in this manuscript provide a more informative assessment of pairs of search engines and are made available as an R function in the Supporting Information.

Galaxy Integrated Omics: Web-based Standards-Compliant Workflows for Proteomics Informed by Transcriptomics

With the recent advent of RNA-seq technology the proteomics community has begun to generate sample-specific protein databases for peptide and protein identification, an approach we call proteomics informed by transcriptomics (PIT). This approach has gained a lot of interest, particularly among researchers who work with nonmodel organisms or with particularly dynamic proteomes such as those observed in developmental biology and host-pathogen studies. PIT has been shown to improve coverage of known proteins, and to reveal potential novel gene products. However, many groups are impeded in their use of PIT by the complexity of the required data analysis. Necessarily, this analysis requires complex integration of a number of different software tools from at least two different communities, and because PIT has a range of biological applications a single software pipeline is not suitable for all use cases. To overcome these problems, we have created GIO, a software system that uses the well-established Galaxy platform to make PIT analysis available to the typical bench scientist via a simple web interface. Within GIO we provide workflows for four common use cases: a standard search against a reference proteome; PIT protein identification without a reference genome; PIT protein identification using a genome guide; and PIT genome annotation. These workflows comprise individual tools that can be reconfigured and rearranged within the web interface to create new workflows to support additional use cases.

Discussion on common data analysis strategies used in MS-based proteomics

Current proteomics technology is limited in resolving the proteome complexity of biological systems. The main issue at stake is to increase throughput and spectra quality so that spatiotemporal dimensions, population parameters and the complexity of protein modifications on a quantitative scale can be considered. MS-based proteomics and protein arrays are the main players in large-scale proteome analysis and an integration of these two methodologies is powerful but presently not sufficient for detailed quantitative and spatiotemporal proteome characterization. Improvements of instrumentation for MS-based proteomics have been achieved recently resulting in data sets of approximately one million spectra which is a large step in the right direction. The corresponding raw data range from 50 to 100 Gb and are frequently made available. Multidimensional LC-MS data sets have been demonstrated to identify and quantitate 2000-8000 proteins from whole cell extracts. The analysis of the resulting data sets requires several steps from raw data processing, to database-dependent search, statistical evaluation of the search result, quantitative algorithms and statistical analysis of quantitative data. A large number of software tools have been proposed for the above-mentioned tasks. However, it is not the aim of this review to cover all software tools, but rather discuss common data analysis strategies used by various algorithms for each of the above-mentioned steps in a non-redundant approach and to argue that there are still some areas which need improvements.