High-throughput analyses and curation of protein interactions in yeast

The Balancing Act of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Enabling Functional Diversity while Minimizing Promiscuity

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) or regions (IDRs) perform diverse cellular functions, but are also prone to forming promiscuous and potentially deleterious interactions. We investigate the extent to which the properties of, and content in, IDRs have adapted to enable functional diversity while limiting interference from promiscuous interactions in the crowded cellular environment. Information on protein sequences, their predicted intrinsic disorder, and 3D structure contents is related to data on protein cellular concentrations, gene co-expression, and protein-protein interactions in the well-studied yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Results reveal that both the protein IDR content and the frequency of "sticky" amino acids in IDRs (those more frequently involved in protein interfaces) decrease with increasing protein cellular concentration. This implies that the IDR content and the amino acid composition of IDRs experience negative selection as the protein concentration increases. In the S. cerevisiae protein-protein interaction network, the higher a protein's IDR content, the more frequently it interacts with IDR-containing partners, and the more functionally diverse the partners are. Employing a clustering analysis of Gene Ontology terms, we newly identify ~600 putative multifunctional proteins in S. cerevisiae. Strikingly, these proteins are enriched in IDRs and contribute significantly to all the observed trends. In particular, IDRs of multi-functional proteins feature more sticky amino acids than IDRs of their non-multifunctional counterparts, or the surfaces of structured yeast proteins. This property likely affords sufficient binding affinity for the functional interactions, commonly mediated by short IDR segments, thereby counterbalancing the loss in overall IDR conformational entropy upon binding.

Extracting high confidence protein interactions from affinity purification data: at the crossroads

Deriving protein-protein interactions from data generated by affinity-purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) techniques requires application of scoring methods to measure the reliability of detected putative interactions. Choosing the appropriate scoring method has become a major challenge. Here we apply six popular scoring methods to the same AP-MS dataset and compare their performance. The comparison was carried out for six distinct datasets from human, fly and yeast, which focus on different biological processes and differ in their coverage of the proteome. Results show that the performance of a given scoring method may vary substantially depending on the dataset. Disturbingly, we find that the high confidence (HC) PPI networks built by applying the six scoring methods to the same raw AP-MS dataset display very poor overlap, with only 1.7-4.1% of the HC interactions present in all the networks built, respectively, from the proteome-wide human, fly or yeast datasets. Various properties of the shared versus unique interactions in each network, including biases in protein abundance, suggest that current scoring methods are able to eliminate only the most obvious contaminants, but still fail to reliably single out specific interactions from the large body of spurious associations detected in the AP-MS experiments.

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The fast progress in AP-MS techniques has prompted the development of a multitude of scoring methods, which are relied upon to remove contaminants and non-specific binders. Choosing the appropriate scoring scheme for a given AP-MS dataset has become a major challenge. The comparative analysis of 6 of the most popular scoring methods, presented here, reveals that overall these methods do not perform as expected. Evidence is provided that this is due to 3 closely related issues: the high 'noise' levels of the raw AP-MS data, the limited capacity of current scoring methods to deal with such high noise levels, and the biases introduced using Gold Standard datasets to benchmark the scoring functions and threshold the networks. For the field to move forward, all three issues will have to be addressed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein dynamics in health and disease. Guest Editors: Pierre Thibault and Anne-Claude Gingras.

Navigating the global protein-protein interaction landscape using iRefWeb

iRefWeb is a bioinformatics resource that offers access to a large collection of data on protein-protein interactions in over a thousand organisms. This collection is consolidated from 14 major public databases that curate the scientific literature. The collection is enhanced with a range of versatile data filters and search options that categorize various types of protein-protein interactions and protein complexes. Users of iRefWeb are able to retrieve all curated interactions for a given organism or those involving a given protein (or a list of proteins), narrow down their search results based on different supporting evidence, and assess the reliability of these interactions using various criteria. They may also examine all data and annotations related to any publication that described the interaction-detection experiments. iRefWeb is freely available to the research community worldwide at http://wodaklab.org/iRefWeb .