Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra

A Review of Protein Inference

Protein inference is an often neglected though crucial step in most proteomic experiments. In the bottom-up proteomic approach, the actual molecules of interest, the proteins, are digested into peptides before measurement on a mass spectrometer. This approach introduces a loss of information: The actual proteins must be inferred based on the identified peptides. While this might seem trivial, there are certain problems, one of the biggest being the presence of peptides that are shared among proteins. These amino acid sequences can, based on the database used for identification, belong to more than one protein. If such peptides are identified in a sample, it cannot be said which proteins actually were in the sample, but only an estimate on the most probable proteins or protein groups can be given based on a predefined inference strategy.Here we describe the effect of the chosen database for peptide identification on the number of shared peptides. Afterward, the mainly used protein inference methods will be sketched, and the necessity of stringent false discovery rate on peptide and protein level is discussed. Finally, we explain how the tool "PIA or protein inference algorithms" can be used together with the workflow environment KNIME and OpenMS to perform protein inference in a common proteomic experiment.

A Current Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics Tools, Data Formats and Resources for Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics

Mass spectrometry is a widely used technology to identify and quantify biomolecules such as lipids, metabolites and proteins necessary for biomedical research. In this study, we catalogued freely available software tools, libraries, databases, repositories and resources that support lipidomics data analysis and determined the scope of currently used analytical technologies. Because of the tremendous importance of data interoperability, we assessed the support of standardized data formats in mass spectrometric (MS)-based lipidomics workflows. We included tools in our comparison that support targeted as well as untargeted analysis using direct infusion/shotgun (DI-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, ion mobility or MS imaging approaches on MS1 and potentially higher MS levels. As a result, we determined that the Human Proteome Organization-Proteomics Standards Initiative standard data formats, mzML and mzTab-M, are already supported by a substantial number of recent software tools. We further discuss how mzTab-M can serve as a bridge between data acquisition and lipid bioinformatics tools for interpretation, capturing their output and transmitting rich annotated data for downstream processing. However, we identified several challenges of currently available tools and standards. Potential areas for improvement were: adaptation of common nomenclature and standardized reporting to enable high throughput lipidomics and improve its data handling. Finally, we suggest specific areas where tools and repositories need to improve to become FAIRer.

pValid: Validation Beyond the Target-Decoy Approach for Peptide Identification in Shotgun Proteomics

As the de facto validation method in mass spectrometry-based proteomics, the target-decoy approach determines a threshold to estimate the false discovery rate and then filters those identifications beyond the threshold. However, the incorrect identifications within the threshold are still unknown and further validation methods are needed. In this study, we characterized a framework of validation and investigated a number of common and novel validation methods. We first defined the accuracy of a validation method by its false-positive rate (FPR) and false-negative rate (FNR) and, further, proved that a validation method with lower FPR and FNR led to identifications with higher sensitivity and precision. Then we proposed a validation method named pValid that incorporated an open database search and a theoretical spectrum prediction strategy via a machine-learning technology. pValid was compared with four common validation methods as well as a synthetic peptide validation method. Tests on three benchmark data sets indicated that pValid had an FPR of 0.03% and an FNR of 1.79% on average, both superior to the other four common validation methods. Tests on a synthetic peptide data set also indicated that the FPR and FNR of pValid were better than those of the synthetic peptide validation method. Tests on a large-scale human proteome data set indicated that pValid successfully flagged the highest number of incorrect identifications among all five methods. Further considering its cost-effectiveness, pValid has the potential to be a feasible validation tool for peptide identification.

A Simplified Workflow for Protein Quantitation of Rat Brain Tissues Using Label-Free Proteomics and Spectral Counting

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is an increasingly valuable tool for determining relative or quantitative protein abundance in brain tissues. A plethora of technical and analytical methods are available, but straightforward and practical approaches are often needed to facilitate reproducibility. This aspect is particularly important as an increasing number of studies focus on models of traumatic brain injury or brain trauma, for which brain tissue proteomes have not yet been fully described. This text provides suggested techniques for robust identification and quantitation of brain proteins by using molecular weight fractionation prior to mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Detailed sample preparation and generalized protocols for chromatography, mass spectrometry, spectral counting, and normalization are described. The rat cerebral cortex isolated from a model of blast-overpressure was used as an exemplary source of brain tissue. However, these techniques may be adapted for lysates generated from several types of cells or tissues and adapted by the end user.