The use of cytogenetic microarrays in myelodysplastic syndrome characterization

Impact of copy neutral loss of heterozygosity and total genome aberrations on survival in myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of diseases with varying genetic aberrations. Half of MDS patients have normal karyotype, obscuring the underlying condition indicating a need for new markers for improved diagnostics and prognosis. We performed a retrospective review of sequential MDS patients who underwent chromosomal genetic array testing (CGAT) between November 2008 and March 2014. Total Genomic Aberration (TGA) scores, with and without copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH), were compared to pathology and clinical data. Of 68 MDS participants, 50 patients (73%) had abnormal CGAT results. 32% showedcnLOH, 41% had no cnLOH but displayed copy number aberration (CNAs). Of 26 patients with normal cytogenetics, 46% had clonal abnormalities by CGAT. Abnormal CGAT results were associated with lower overall survival (P=0.04). Overall survival in patients with TGA above the median (68.6 Mb) was significantly inferior to those below the median (HR=2.9, 95% CI=1.3-6.8, P=0.01). Furthermore, there was an observed association between increased TGA and increased dysplastic lineages (Ptrend=0.003). CGAT studies provide important findings that extend beyond current standard testing. Clinical utility of CGAT includes improved diagnostic yield, correlation of extent of TGA and increased dysplastic features, and survival.

What Is the Clinical Utility of Repeat SNP Array Testing in the Follow-up of Myeloid Neoplasms?: A Retrospective Analysis of 44 Patients With Serial SNP Arrays

OBJECTIVES

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have been shown to identify cytogenetic abnormalities in myeloid neoplasms that may be missed by metaphase cytogenetics alone at initial diagnosis. This study examines the utility of serial SNP arrays in follow-up testing of myeloid neoplasms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed results of SNP array testing in 44 patients with myeloid neoplasms and more than one SNP array study (n = 133 SNP arrays total; median, three per patient; range, two to eight per patient).

RESULTS

Baseline abnormalities were identified by SNP array in 35 (79%) of 44 (79%) compared with 18 (50%) of 36 by metaphase karyotype. In follow-up studies, clonal evolution was found by both SNP array and karyotyping in seven (15.9%), by metaphase karyotyping alone in six (13.6%), and SNP arrays alone in two (4.5%). Overall survival was not significantly different between patients with or without clonal evolution detected by SNP array.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, the first systematic examination of serial SNP arrays in myeloid neoplasms, confirms the clinical utility of SNP arrays at initial diagnosis but shows that clonal evolution of the karyotype can be detected by metaphase cytogenetics alone in most patients. Follow-up SNP array testing is not required in routine clinical use in most cases.

Combined comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism array detects cryptic chromosomal lesions in both myelodysplastic syndromes and cytopenias of undetermined significance

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) can be challenging, and may be facilitated by correlation with cytogenetic testing. Microarray analysis using comparative genomic hybridization and/or single-nucleotide polymorphism array can detect chromosomal abnormalities not seen by standard metaphase cytogenetics. We examined the ability of combined comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis (hereafter referred to as 'combined array') to detect changes among 83 patients with unexplained cytopenias undergoing pathologic evaluation for MDS and compared results with 18 normal bone marrow controls. Thirty-seven patients (45%) were diagnosed with MDS, 12 patients (14%) were demonstrated to have 'indeterminate dyspoiesis' (insufficient for classification of MDS), 27 (33%) were essentially normal, and 7 patients (8%) had alternative pathologic diagnoses. Twenty-one MDS patients (57% of diagnoses) had effectively normal metaphase cytogenetics, but combined array showed that 5 of these (13% of MDS patients) harbored major cryptic chromosomal aberrations. Furthermore, nearly half of patients with 'indeterminate dyspoiesis' and 1 with normal morphology had clonal cytopenia(s) of undetermined significance by combined array analysis. Cryptic array findings among MDS patients and those with clonal cytopenias(s) included large-scale copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (up to 118 Mb) and genomic deletion of loci implicated in MDS pathogenesis (eg, TET2 (4q22) and NUP98 (11p15)). By comparison, in MDS patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetics, microarray mostly recapitulated findings seen by routine karyotype. Combined array analysis has considerable diagnostic yield in detecting cryptic chromosomal aberrations in MDS and in demonstrating aberrant clonal hematopoiesis in cytopenic patients with indeterminate morphologic dysplasia.

Genomic alterations in abnormal neutrophils isolated from adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an abnormal population of neutrophils, called low-density granulocytes (LDGs), that express the surface markers of mature neutrophils, yet their nuclear morphology resembles an immature cell. Because a similar discrepancy in maturation status is observed in myelodysplasias, and disruption of neutrophil development is frequently associated with genomic alterations, genomic DNA isolated from autologous pairs of LDGs and normal-density neutrophils was compared for genomic changes.

METHODS

Alterations in copy number and losses of heterozygosity (LOH) were detected by cytogenetic microarray analysis. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected by capillary gel electrophoresis of fluorescently labeled PCR products.

RESULTS

Control neutrophils and normal-density SLE neutrophils had similar levels of copy number variations, while the autologous SLE LDGs had an over twofold greater number of copy number alterations per genome. The additional copy number alterations found in LDGs were prevalent in six of the thirteen SLE patients, and occurred preferentially on chromosome 19, 17, 8, and X. These same SLE patients also displayed an increase in LOH. Several SLE patients had a common LOH on chromosome 5q that includes several cytokine genes and a DNA repair enzyme. In addition, three SLE patients displayed MSI. Two patients displayed MSI in greater than one marker, and one patient had MSI and increased copy number alterations. No correlations between genomic instability and immunosuppressive drugs, disease activity or disease manifestations were apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased level of copy number alterations and LOH in the LDG samples relative to autologous normal-density SLE neutrophils suggests somatic alterations that are consistent with DNA strand break repair, while MSI suggests a replication error-prone status. Thus, the LDGs isolated have elevated levels of somatic alterations that are consistent with genetic damage or genomic instability. This suggests that the LDGs in adult SLE patients are derived from cell progenitors that are distinct from the autologous normal-density neutrophils, and may reflect a role for genomic instability in the disease.