A high-throughput yeast two-hybrid protocol to determine virus-host protein interactions

The Use of Yeast in Biosensing

Yeast has been used as a model for several diseases as it is the simplest unicellular eukaryote, safe and easy to culture and harbors most of the fundamental processes that are present in almost all higher eukaryotes, including humans. From understanding the pathogenesis of disease to drug discovery studies, yeast has served as an important biosensor. It is not only due to the conservation of genetics, amenable modification of its genome and easily accessible analytical methods, but also some characteristic features such as its ability to survive with defective mitochondria, making it a highly flexible microbe for designing whole-cell biosensing systems. The aim of this review is to report on how yeasts have been utilized as biosensors, reporting on responses to various stimuli.

A Simple Quantitative Assay for Measuring β-Galactosidase Activity Using X-Gal in Yeast-Based Interaction Analyses

Yeast-based interaction assays to determine protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions commonly rely on the reconstitution of chimeric transcription factors that activate the expression of target reporter genes. The enzyme β-galactosidase (β-gal), coded by the LacZ gene of Escherichia coli, is a widely used reporter in yeast systems, and its expression is commonly assessed by evaluating its activity. X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside) is an inexpensive and sensitive substrate of β-gal, whose hydrolysis results in an intensely blue colored and easily detectable end product, 5,5'-dibromo-4,4'-dichloro-indigo. The insoluble nature of this end product, however, makes X-gal-based assays unsuitable for direct spectrophotometric absorbance quantification. As such, the use of X-gal is mostly restricted to solid-support approaches, such as colony lift or agar plate assays, which often only provide a qualitative readout. In this article, we describe a quantitative solid-phase X-gal assay to measure protein-protein interaction strength in yeast cells using a simple and low-cost experimental setup. We have optimized multiple aspects of the assay, namely sample preparation, reaction time, and quantification method, for speed and consistency. By integrating the use of a freely available ImageJ-based plugin, we have further standardized the assay for reliability and reproducibility. This improved quantitative X-gal assay can be performed in a standard molecular biology lab without the need for any specialized equipment other than an inexpensive and widely accessible smartphone camera. To exemplify the protocol, we provide detailed step-by-step instructions to perform a quantitative X-gal assay to assess the interaction between two Arabidopsis thaliana proteins, SUPPRESSOR OF PHYA-105 1 (SPA1) and PRODUCTION OF ANTHOCYANIN PIGMENT 2 (PAP2). To demonstrate the sensitivity of our assay in detecting weaker interactions, we also compare the results with a liquid-phase assay that uses ONPG (ortho-nitrophenyl-β-galactopyranoside) as a substrate for β-gal. The quantitative X-gal assay described here can easily be adapted for high-throughout interaction studies and protein domain mapping, even in yeast strains with low levels of LacZ expression. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of competent yeast cells and transformation Alternate Protocol 1: In-house preparation of yeast competent cells for use in lithium acetate (LiAc)-mediated yeast transformation Support Protocol: Long-term storage and revival of frozen yeast strain stocks Basic Protocol 2: Measuring β-galactosidase activity via the quantitative X-gal assay Alternate Protocol 2: Quantification of interaction strength using liquid ONPG assay.

The HSV1 Tail-Anchored Membrane Protein pUL34 Contains a Basic Motif That Supports Active Transport to the Inner Nuclear Membrane Prior to Formation of the Nuclear Egress Complex

Herpes simplex virus type 1 nucleocapsids are released from the host nucleus by a budding process through the nuclear envelope called nuclear egress. Two viral proteins, the integral membrane proteins pUL34 and pUL31, form the nuclear egress complex at the inner nuclear membrane, which is critical for this process. The nuclear import of both proteins ensues separately from each other: pUL31 is actively imported through the central pore channel, while pUL34 is transported along the peripheral pore membrane. With this study, we identified a functional bipartite NLS between residues 178 and 194 of pUL34. pUL34 lacking its NLS is mislocalized to the TGN but retargeted to the ER upon insertion of the authentic NLS or a mimic NLS, independent of the insertion site. If co-expressed with pUL31, either of the pUL34-NLS variants is efficiently, although not completely, targeted to the nuclear rim where co-localization with pUL31 and membrane budding seem to occur, comparable to the wild-type. The viral mutant HSV1(17⁺)Lox-UL34-NLS mt is modestly attenuated but viable and associated with localization of pUL34-NLS mt to both the nuclear periphery and cytoplasm. We propose that targeting of pUL34 to the INM is facilitated by, but not dependent on, the presence of an NLS, thereby supporting NEC formation and viral replication.

Interaction between Two Iridovirus Core Proteins and Their Effects on Ranavirus (RGV) Replication in Cells from Different Species

The two putative proteins RGV-63R and RGV-91R encoded by Rana grylio virus (RGV) are DNA polymerase and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) respectively, and are core proteins of iridoviruses. Here, the interaction between RGV-63R and RGV-91R was detected by a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay and further confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays. Subsequently, RGV-63R or RGV-91R were expressed alone or co-expressed in two kinds of aquatic animal cells including amphibian Chinese giant salamander thymus cells (GSTCs) and fish Epithelioma papulosum cyprinid cells (EPCs) to investigate their localizations and effects on RGV genome replication. The results showed that their localizations in the two kinds of cells are consistent. RGV-63R localized in the cytoplasm, while RGV-91R localized in the nucleus. However, when co-expressed, RGV-63R localized in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus, and colocalized with RGV-91R in the nucleus. 91R△NLS represents the RGV-91R deleting nuclear localization signal, which is localized in the cytoplasm and colocalized with RGV-63R in the cytoplasm. qPCR analysis revealed that sole expression and co-expression of the two proteins in the cells of two species significantly promoted RGV genome replication, while varying degrees of viral genome replication levels may be linked to the cell types. This study provides novel molecular evidence for ranavirus cross-species infection and replication.

The Herpes Simplex Virus Protein pUL31 Escorts Nucleocapsids to Sites of Nuclear Egress, a Process Coordinated by Its N-Terminal Domain

Progeny capsids of herpesviruses leave the nucleus by budding through the nuclear envelope. Two viral proteins, the membrane protein pUL34 and the nucleo-phosphoprotein pUL31 form the nuclear egress complex that is required for capsid egress out of the nucleus. All pUL31 orthologs are composed of a diverse N-terminal domain with 1 to 3 basic patches and a conserved C-terminal domain. To decipher the functions of the N-terminal domain, we have generated several Herpes simplex virus mutants and show here that the N-terminal domain of pUL31 is essential with basic patches being critical for viral propagation. pUL31 and pUL34 entered the nucleus independently of each other via separate routes and the N-terminal domain of pUL31 was required to prevent their premature interaction in the cytoplasm. Unexpectedly, a classical bipartite nuclear localization signal embedded in this domain was not required for nuclear import of pUL31. In the nucleus, pUL31 associated with the nuclear envelope and newly formed capsids. Viral mutants lacking the N-terminal domain or with its basic patches neutralized still associated with nucleocapsids but were unable to translocate them to the nuclear envelope. Replacing the authentic basic patches with a novel artificial one resulted in HSV1(17⁺)Lox-UL31-hbpmp1mp2, that was viable but delayed in nuclear egress and compromised in viral production. Thus, while the C-terminal domain of pUL31 is sufficient for the interaction with nucleocapsids, the N-terminal domain was essential for capsid translocation to sites of nuclear egress and a coordinated interaction with pUL34. Our data indicate an orchestrated sequence of events with pUL31 binding to nucleocapsids and escorting them to the inner nuclear envelope. We propose a common mechanism for herpesviral nuclear egress: pUL31 is required for intranuclear translocation of nucleocapsids and subsequent interaction with pUL34 thereby coupling capsid maturation with primary envelopment.

Herpesviral capsid assembly is initiated in the host nucleus. Due to size constraints, newly formed nucleocapsids are unable to leave the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex. Instead herpesviruses apply an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for nuclear export of capsids called nuclear egress. This process is initiated by docking of capsids at the inner nuclear membrane, budding of enveloped capsids into the perinuclear space followed by de-envelopment and release of capsids to the cytoplasm where further maturation occurs. Two viral proteins conserved throughout the herpesvirus family, the membrane protein pUL34 and the phosphoprotein pUL31 form the nuclear egress complex that is critical for primary envelopment. We show here that pUL31 and pUL34 enter the nucleus independently of each other. pUL31 is targeted to the nucleoplasm where it binds to nucleocapsids via the conserved C-terminal domain, while its N-terminal domain is important for capsid translocation to the nuclear envelope and for a coordinated interaction with pUL34. Our data suggest a mechanism that is apparently conserved among all herpesviruses with pUL31 escorting nucleocapsids to the nuclear envelope in order to couple capsid maturation with primary envelopment.

HCMV pUL135 remodels the actin cytoskeleton to impair immune recognition of infected cells

Immune evasion genes help human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) establish lifelong persistence. Without immune pressure, laboratory-adapted HCMV strains have undergone genetic alterations. Among these, the deletion of the UL/b' domain is associated with loss of virulence. In a screen of UL/b', we identified pUL135 as a protein responsible for the characteristic cytopathic effect of clinical HCMV strains that also protected from natural killer (NK) and T cell attack. pUL135 interacted directly with abl interactor 1 (ABI1) and ABI2 to recruit the WAVE2 regulatory complex to the plasma membrane, remodel the actin cytoskeleton and dramatically reduce the efficiency of immune synapse (IS) formation. An intimate association between F-actin filaments in target cells and the IS was dispelled by pUL135 expression. Thus, F-actin in target cells plays a critical role in synaptogenesis, and this can be exploited by pathogens to protect against cytotoxic immune effector cells. An independent interaction between pUL135 and talin disrupted cell contacts with the extracellular matrix.