Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Chronic Stroke Patients with Sedentary Behavior: A Pilot Study

Intracranial compliance and volumetry in patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Cerebral edema (CE) and intracranial hypertension (IHT) are complications of numerous neurological pathologies. However, the study of CE and noninvasive methods to predict IHT remains rudimentary. This study aims to identify in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients the relationship between the volume of the lateral ventricles and the parameters of the noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform (nICPW).

METHODS

This is an analytical, descriptive, and cross-sectional study with nonsurgical TBI patients. The monitoring of nICPW was performed with a mechanical strain gauge, and the volumetry of the lateral ventricles was calculated using the free 3D Slicer software, both during the acute phase of the injury. The linear model of fixed and random mixed effects with Gamma was used to calculate the influence of nICPW parameters (P2/P1 and time-to-peak [TTP]) values on volumetry.

RESULTS

Considering only the fixed effects of the sample, there was P = 0.727 (95% CI [-0.653; 0.364]) for the relationship between P2/P1 and volumetry and 0.727 (95% CI [-1.657; 1.305]) for TTP and volumetry. Considering the fixed and random effects, there was P = 8.5e-10 (95% CI [-0.759; 0.355]) for the relationship between P2/P1 and volumetry and 8.5e-10 (95% CI [-2.001; 0.274]) for TTP and volumetry.

CONCLUSION

The present study with TBI patients found association between nICPW parameters and the volume of the lateral ventricles in the 1st days after injury.

Can a new noninvasive method for assessment of intracranial pressure predict intracranial hypertension and prognosis?

PURPOSE

Individuals with TBI are at risk of intracranial hypertension (ICH), and monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is usually indicated. However, despite many new noninvasive devices, none is sufficiently accurate and effective for application in clinical practice, particularly in the management of TBIs. This study aimed to compare the noninvasive Brain4Care system (nICP) with invasive ICP (iICP) curve parameters in their ability to predict ICH and functional prognosis in severe TBI.

METHODS

Observational, descriptive-analytical, and prospective study of 22 patients between 2018 and 2021, simultaneously monitored with nICP and iICP. The independent variables evaluated were the presence of ICH and functional prognoses. The dependent variables were the P2/P1 pressure ratio metrics, time to peak (TTP), and TTP × P2/P1.

RESULTS

We found a good nonlinear correlation between iICP and nICP waveforms, despite a moderate Pearson's linear correlation. The noninvasive parameters of P2/P1, P2/P1 × TTP, and TTP were not associated with outcomes or ICH. The nICP P2/P1 ratio showed sensitivity/specificity/accuracy (%) of 100/0/56.3, respectively for 1-month outcomes and 77.8/22.2/50 for 6-month outcomes. The nICP TTP ratio had values of 100/0/56.3 for 1-month and 99.9/42.9/72.2 for 6-month outcomes. The nICP P2/P1 × TTP values were 100/0/56.3 for 1-month outcomes and 81.8/28.6/61.1 for 6-month outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Brain4Care's noninvasive method showed low specificity and accuracy and cannot be used as the sole means of monitoring ICP in patients with severe TBI. Future studies with a larger sample of patients with P2 > P1 and new nICP curve parameters are warranted.

Noninvasive methods to monitor intracranial pressure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intracranial pressure (ICP) is determined by the production of and outflow facility of cerebrospinal fluid. Since alterations in ICP are implicated in several vision-threatening and life-threatening diseases, measurement of ICP is necessary and common. All current clinical methods to measure ICP are invasive and carry the risk for significant side effects. Therefore, the development of accurate, reliable, objective, and portal noninvasive devices to measure ICP has the potential to change the practice of medicine. This review discusses recent advances and barriers to the clinical implementation of noninvasive devices to determine ICP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many noninvasive methods to determine ICP have been developed. Although most have significant limitations limiting their clinical utility, several noninvasive methods have shown strong correlations with invasively obtained ICP and have excellent potential to be developed further to accurately quantify ICP and ICP changes.

SUMMARY

Although invasive methods remain the mainstay for ICP determination and monitoring, several noninvasive biomarkers have shown promise to quantitatively assess and monitor ICP. With further refinement and advancement of these techniques, it is highly possible that noninvasive methods will become more commonplace and may complement or even supplant invasively obtained methods to determine ICP in certain situations.

Intracranial Compliance Assessed by Intracranial Pressure Pulse Waveform

BACKGROUND

Morphological alterations in intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse waveform (ICPW) secondary to intracranial hypertension (ICP >20 mmHg) and a reduction in intracranial compliance (ICC) are well known indicators of neurological severity. The exclusive exploration of modifications in ICPW after either the loss of skull integrity or surgical procedures for intracranial hypertension resolution is not a common approach studied. The present study aimed to assess the morphological alterations in ICPW among neurocritical care patients with skull defects and decompressive craniectomy (DC) by comparing the variations in ICPW features according to elevations in mean ICP values.

METHODS

Patients requiring ICP monitoring because of acute brain injury were included. A continuous record of 10 min-length for the beat-by-beat analysis of ICPW was performed, with ICP elevation produced by means of ultrasound-guided manual internal jugular vein compression at the end of the record. ICPW features (peak amplitude ratio (P2/P1), time interval to pulse peak (TTP) and pulse amplitude) were counterweighed between baseline and compression periods. Results were distributed for three groups: intact skull (exclusive burr hole for ICP monitoring), craniotomy/large fractures (group 2) or DC (group 3).

RESULTS

57 patients were analyzed. A total of 21 (36%) presented no skull defects, 21 (36%) belonged to group 2, whereas 15 (26%) had DC. ICP was not significantly different between groups: ±15.11 for intact, 15.33 for group 2 and ±20.81 mmHg for group 3, with ICP-induced elevation also similar between groups (p = 0.56). Significant elevation was observed for the P2/P1 ratio for groups 1 and 2, whereas a reduction was observed in group 3 (elevation of ±0.09 for groups 1 and 2, but a reduction of 0.03 for group 3, p = 0.01), and no significant results were obtained for TTP and pulse amplitudes.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, intracranial pressure pulse waveform analysis indicated that intracranial compliance was significantly more impaired among decompressive craniectomy patients, although ICPW indicated DC to be protective for further influences of ICP elevations over the brain. The analysis of ICPW seems to be an alternative to real-time ICC assessment.