1
|
Zimoch-Rumanek P, Antos D. Coupling cation and anion exchange chromatography for fast separation of monoclonal antibody charge variants. J Chromatogr A 2024; 1733:465256. [PMID: 39153427 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
A design procedure for the separation of charge variants of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) was developed, which was based on the coupling of cation-exchange chromatography (CEX) and anion-exchange chromatography (AEX) under high loading conditions. The design of the coupled process was supported by a dynamic model. The model was calibrated on the basis of band profiles of variants determined experimentally for the mAb materials of different variant compositions. The numerical simulations were used to select the coupling configuration and the loading conditions that allowed for efficient separation of the mAb materials into three products enriched with each individual variant: the acidic (av), main (mv) and basic (bv) one. In the CEX section, a two-step pH gradient was used to split the loaded mass of mAb into a weakly bound fraction enriched with av and mv, and a strongly bound fraction containing the bv-rich product. The weakly bound fraction was further processed in the AEX section, where the mv-rich product was eluted in flowthrough, while the av-rich product was collected by a step change in pH. The choice of flow distribution and the number of columns in the CEX and AEX sections depended on the variant composition of the mAb material. For the selected configurations, the optimized mAb loading density in the CEX columns ranged from 10 to 26 mg mL-1, while in the AEX columns it was as high as 300 or 600 mg mL-1, depending on the variant composition of the mAb material. By proper selection of the loading condition, a trade-off between yield and purity of the products could be reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dorota Antos
- Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Rzeszów University of Technology, Rzeszów/PL, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abu Hammad K, Dinu V, MacCalman TE, Pattem J, Goodall M, Gillis RB, Jefferis R, Harding SE. Comparative sedimentation equilibrium analysis of two IgG1 glycoforms: IgGCri and IgGWid. EUROPEAN BIOPHYSICS JOURNAL : EBJ 2023; 52:439-443. [PMID: 37195494 PMCID: PMC10444637 DOI: 10.1007/s00249-023-01656-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The solution properties of two different glycoforms of IgG1 (IgG1Cri and IgG1Wid) are compared using primarily sedimentation equilibrium analysis with two complementary analysis routines: SEDFIT-MSTAR and MULTISIG. IgGCri bears diantennary complex-type glycans on its Fc domain that are fully core fucosylated and partially sialylated, whilst on IgGWid, they are non-fucosylated, partially galactosylated and non-sialylated. IgGWid is also Fab glycosylated. Despite these differences, SEDFIT-MSTAR analysis shows similar weight average molar masses Mw of ~ (150 ± 5) kDa for IgGCri and ~ (154 ± 5) kDa for IgGWid and both glycoforms show evidence of the presence of a small fraction of dimer confirmed by MULTISIG analysis and also by sedimentation coefficient distributions from supportive sedimentation velocity measurements. The closeness of the sedimentation equilibrium behaviour and sedimentation coefficient distributions with a main peak sedimentation coefficient of ~ 6.4S for both glycoforms at different concentrations suggest that the different glycosylation profiles do not significantly impact on molar mass (molecular weight) nor conformation in solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Abu Hammad
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Vlad Dinu
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Thomas E MacCalman
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
- School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Jacob Pattem
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
- School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Margaret Goodall
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Richard B Gillis
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
- School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK
- College of Business, Technology and Engineering, Food and Nutrition Group, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK
| | - Roy Jefferis
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Stephen E Harding
- National Centre for Macromolecular Hydrodynamics (NCMH), School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, LE12 5RD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|