RNA quality in fresh-frozen gastrointestinal tumor specimens-experiences from the tumor and healthy tissue bank TU Dresden

Impact of standardization in tissue processing: the performance of different fixatives

Most tissues in clinical practice are formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded for histological as well as molecular analyses. The reproducibility and uniformity of molecular analyses is strictly dependent on the quality of the biomolecules, which is highly influenced by pre-analytical processes. In this study, the effect of different fixatives was compared, including formalin, Bouin's solution, RCL2® and TAG-1™ fixatives, by stringent application of ISO standards in mouse liver tissue processing, including formalin-free transport of tissues and tissue grossing in a refrigerated environment. The effect of fixatives was studied in terms of nucleic acid quality at the time of tissue processing and after one year of tissue storage at room temperature in the dark. Furthermore, a microcomputed tomography (CT) scan analysis was applied to investigate the paraffin embedding. The results show that the application of ISO standards in tissue processing allows analysis of 400 bases amplicons from RNA and 1000 bases from DNA, even in extracts from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. However, after one year storage at room temperature in the dark, a degradation of the nucleic acids was observed. Nevertheless, extracts can still be analyzed, but for metachronous tests it is highly recommended to repeat the quantitation of housekeeping genes in order to standardize the extent of nucleic acid degradation.

Multiple freeze-thaw cycles lead to a loss of consistency in poly(A)-enriched RNA sequencing

Background

Both RNA-Seq and sample freeze-thaw are ubiquitous. However, knowledge about the impact of freeze-thaw on downstream analyses is limited. The lack of common quality metrics that are sufficiently sensitive to freeze-thaw and RNA degradation, e.g. the RNA Integrity Score, makes such assessments challenging.

Results

Here we quantify the impact of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on the reliability of RNA-Seq by examining poly(A)-enriched and ribosomal RNA depleted RNA-seq from frozen leukocytes drawn from a toddler Autism cohort. To do so, we estimate the relative noise, or percentage of random counts, separating technical replicates. Using this approach we measured noise associated with RIN and freeze-thaw cycles. As expected, RIN does not fully capture sample degradation due to freeze-thaw. We further examined differential expression results and found that three freeze-thaws should extinguish the differential expression reproducibility of similar experiments. Freeze-thaw also resulted in a 3′ shift in the read coverage distribution along the gene body of poly(A)-enriched samples compared to ribosomal RNA depleted samples, suggesting that library preparation may exacerbate freeze-thaw-induced sample degradation.

Conclusion

The use of poly(A)-enrichment for RNA sequencing is pervasive in library preparation of frozen tissue, and thus, it is important during experimental design and data analysis to consider the impact of repeated freeze-thaw cycles on reproducibility.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-021-07381-z.

Tissues under-vacuum to overcome suboptimal preservation

The accuracy of histopathological diagnosis is strictly reliant on adequate tissue preservation, which is completely dependent on pre-analytical variables. Among these variables, the time interval between the end of surgical excision to the onset of fixation (the cold ischemia time) may adversely affect preservation of tissue morphology, influencing the interpretation and reproducibility of diagnosis. During this time interval, the activation of enzymes may produce autolysis and degradation of antigens and nucleic acids, thus potentially affecting immunocytochemical and molecular results. Several studies have described under-vacuum at 4 °C storage of fresh surgical specimens as a safe and reliable method to control cold ischemia and preserve fresh tissues, as well as to standardize fixation times and implement tissue-banking. This review article gives a systematic overview of the advantages and drawbacks of the use of under-vacuum tissue preservation and cooling in surgical pathology, highlighting the impact this procedure may have on diagnostic and experimental pathology. It also documents our experience acquired within daily practice and national and international projects.

Fundamentals of RNA Analysis on Biobanked Specimens

Compared to DNA, analysis of RNA is one step closer on the central dogma of biology to assessing cellular function. This makes it an extremely valuable target for research and clinical testing in nearly all areas of molecular biology. Most RNA molecules are ephemeral by nature. They exist as temporary intermediates, ostensibly enabling data transfer between the genome and the organism. Their ribose backbone renders them sensitive to simple degradation over time and they are the target molecule for numerous and abundant ribonucleases which have evolved to chop them to pieces with extreme efficiency. At the biochemical level, this means that they degrade rapidly in most physiological and laboratory conditions and are thus challenging to study. When considering specimen banking, it is critical to keep this reality in mind, as some commonly used banking modalities will not adequately preserve the relevant RNA molecules in a measureable state.In this chapter, we explore the broad range of RNA testing methodologies in current use, with particular focus on how specimen preparation impacts analysis. Following an overview in the introduction, Subheading 2 covers the major specimen types amenable to RNA analysis in the context of biobanking. Subheading 3 discusses the applications of various RNA analysis modalities to research and clinical testing.

Tumor Cell Content and RNA Integrity of Surgical Tissues from Different Types of Tumors and Its Correlation with Ex Vivo and In Vivo Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Tissues from tumor patients are important resources for promoting cancer research, and therefore many biobanks have been established to collect tumor tissues; however, the quality of tumor tissues after surgical resection has not been well documented.

METHODS

A total of 896 cases of tissues from 12 types of tumors were chosen for this study. First, histopathological examination was conducted to evaluate the tumor cell content; second, microchip electrophoresis was used to determine the RNA integrity number (RIN) in 466 cases of tissues with a tumor cell content ≥ 75%; and, finally, a correlation test was used to analyze the effect of ischemia on RNA integrity in 384 cases of tissues with a recorded ischemia time.

RESULTS

Tumor tissues from 12 different organs had different tumor cell contents and RNA integrity. The liver had the highest percentage (69.7%) of tissue samples with a tumor cell content ≥ 75%, and the highest percentage (96%) of samples with an RIN ≥ 7. RNA integrity was not correlated with limited ex vivo ischemia time (5-60 min) in any of the 12 types of tumors. In contrast, a significant correlation with in vivo ischemia time was observed in several types of tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Not every sample of excised tumor tissue has a sufficient amount of tumor cells and enough RNA integrity. In vivo ischemia has a more significant influence on RNA integrity, and tumor tissues have different tolerances to pre-analytical variables. Those conducting translational research should pay attention to pre-analytical variables when collecting and utilizing tumor tissues.

Factors That Influence the Quality of RNA From the Pancreas of Organ Donors

OBJECTIVES

Attaining high-quality RNA from the tissues or organs of deceased donors used for research can be challenging due to physiological and logistical considerations. In this investigation, METHODS: RNA Integrity Number (RIN) was determined in pancreatic samples from 236 organ donors and used to define high (≥6.5) and low (≤4.5) quality RNAs. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the potential effects of novel or established organ and donor factors on RIN.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed donor cause of death (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.77; P = 0.01), prolonged tissue storage before RNA extraction (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < 0.01), pancreas region sampled (multiple comparisons, P < 0.01), and sample type (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.67; P < 0.01) negatively influenced outcome. Conversely, duration of final hospitalization (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.59-10.37; P < 0.01) and sample collection protocol (OR, 8.48; 95% CI, 3.96-19.30; P < 0.01) positively impacted outcome. Islet RNA obtained via laser capture microdissection improved RIN when compared with total pancreatic RNA from the same donor (ΔRIN = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.0; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A multivariable model demonstrates that autopsy-free and biopsy-free human pancreata received, processed, and preserved at a single center, using optimized procedures, from organ donors dying of anoxia with normal lipase levels increase the odds of obtaining high-quality RNA.

Biobanking of Fresh-Frozen Human Adenocarcinomatous and Normal Colon Tissues: Which Parameters Influence RNA Quality?

Medical research projects become increasingly dependent on biobanked tissue of high quality because the reliability of gene expression is affected by the quality of extracted RNA. Hence, the present study aimed to determine if clinical, surgical, histological, and molecular parameters influence RNA quality of normal and tumoral frozen colonic tissues. RNA Quality Index (RQI) was evaluated on 241 adenocarcinomas and 115 matched normal frozen colon tissues collected between October 2006 and December 2012. RQI results were compared to patients’ age and sex, tumor site, kind of surgery, anastomosis failure, adenocarcinoma type and grade, tumor cell percentage, necrosis extent, HIF-1α and cleaved caspase-3 immunohistochemistry, and BRAF, KRAS and microsatellites status. The RQI was significantly higher in colon cancer tissue than in matched normal tissue. RQI from left-sided colonic cancers was significantly higher than RQI from right-sided cancers. The RNA quality was not affected by ischemia and storage duration. According to histological control, 7.9% of the samples were unsatisfactory because of inadequate sampling. Biobanked tumoral tissues with RQI ≥5 had lower malignant cells to stromal cells ratio than samples with RQI <5 (p <0.05). Cellularity, necrosis extent and mucinous component did not influence RQI results. Cleaved caspase-3 and HIF-1α immunolabelling were not correlated to RQI. BRAF, KRAS and microsatellites molecular status did not influence RNA quality. Multivariate analysis revealed that the tumor location, the surgical approach (laparoscopy versus open colectomy) and the occurrence of anastomotic leakage were the only parameters influencing significantly RQI results of tumor samples. We failed to identify parameter influencing RQI of normal colon samples. These data suggest that RNA quality of colonic adenocarcinoma biospecimens is determined by clinical and surgical parameters. More attention should be paid during the biobanking procedure of right-sided colon cancer or laparoscopic colectomy specimen. Histological quality control remains essential to control sampling accuracy.