Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure During Infusion Tests

Impacts of a Pressure Challenge on Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure and Effective Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) comprises intracranial pressure (ICP) and arteriolar wall tension (WT). It is the arterial blood pressure (ABP) at which small vessels close and circulation stops. We hypothesized that the increase in WT secondary to a systemic hypertensive challenge would lead to an increase in CrCP and that the "effective" cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPeff; calculated as ABP - CrCP) would give more complete information than the "conventional" cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP; calculated as ABP - ICP).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare CrCP, CPP, and CPPeff changes during a hypertensive challenge in patients with a severe traumatic brain injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on ABP, ICP, and cerebral blood flow velocity, measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound, were acquired simultaneously for 30 min both basally and during a hypertensive challenge. An impedance-based CrCP model was used.

RESULTS

The following values are expressed as median (interquartile range). There were 11 patients, aged 29 (14) years. CPP increased from 73 (17) to 102 (26) mmHg (P ≤ 0.001). ICP did not change. CrCP changed from 23 (11) to 27 (10) mmHg (P ≤ 0.001). WT increased from 7 (5) to 11 (7) mmHg (P ˂ 0.005). CPPeff changed less than CPP.

CONCLUSION

The CPP change was greater than the CPPeff change, mainly because CrCP increased simultaneously with the WT increase as a result of the autoregulatory response. CPPeff provides information about the real driving force generating blood movement.

Imaging anatomy of the vertebral canal for trans-sacral hiatus puncture of the lumbar cistern

A standard lumbar puncture may be impossible for many anatomic or technical reasons. Previous accounts of caudal epidural anesthesia and other procedures via the sacral hiatus prompted us to test if image-guided percutaneous trans-sacral hiatus access to the lumbosacral subarachnoid cistern would be anatomically feasible. To study vertebral canal morphometry and curvature, we analyzed midsagittal computed tomography-myelogram images of 40 normal subjects and digitally measured sacral curvatures between S1 to S5 and S2 to S4 using two methods whereby a lower angle signifies a straighter sacrum. We measured midsagittal vertebral canal area, hiatus width, dural sac termination levels, and distance from sacral hiatus to the dural sac tip (needle distance). Subjects were F:M = 25:15, with a mean age of 44.9 years. The two S1-S5 full sacral curvature mean angles were 57.3° and 60.4°. Almost all sacral hiatuses were at S4, and dural sac terminations were at S1-S2. The mean S2-S4 sacral curvature was 25.1°, and the mean needle distance was 57.7 mm. Using two-way analysis of variance, there were significant sex differences for needle distances (p = .001), and full and limited sacral curvatures (p = .02, and p = .046, respectively). There were no significant linear regression correlations between age and sacral curvature, needle distance, canal area, or hiatus width. Therefore, despite a frequently prominent full sacral curvature, the combination of S1-S2 dural sac termination plus a relatively straight trajectory of the lower vertebral canal between S2 and S4 support the theoretical feasibility of percutaneous trans-sacral hiatus and vertebral canal access to the lumbosacral cistern using a standard spinal needle.

Are high lumbar punctures safe? A magnetic resonance imaging morphometric study of the conus medullaris

A high lumbar puncture (LP) at L2-L3 or above is often necessary to consider on technical grounds, but complications of conus medullaris (CM) damage during high LP are potentially concerning. We hypothesized that a high LP might be safer than previously thought by accounting for movements of the CM upon patient positional changes. We retrospectively reviewed standard normal supine lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of 58 patients and used electronic calipers on axial images at the T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3 disc levels to measure the transverse diameter of the CM relative to the size of the dorsal thecal sac space (DTSS) through which a spinal needle could be inserted. On 142 axial images, the means for CM diameters were 8.2, 6.0, and 2.9 mm at the three levels, respectively. We then used known literature mean CM displacement values in the legs flexed and unflexed lateral decubitus position (LDP) to factor in CM shifts to the dependent side. We found that at all three levels, the likely positional shift of the CM would be too small and insufficient to displace the entire CM out of the DTSS. However, if needle placement could be confined to the midsagittal plane, an LP in the unflexed LDP would theoretically be entirely safe at both L1-L2 and L2-L3, and almost so at L2-L3 in the legs flexed LDP. Thus, high LPs at L1-L2 and L2-L3 are in theory likely safer than considered previously, more so in the legs unflexed than in the flexed LDP. Clin. Anat. 32:618-629, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.