Role of Abscisic Acid Producing PGPR in Sustainable Agriculture

Efforts towards overcoming drought stress in crops: Revisiting the mechanisms employed by plant growth-promoting bacteria

Globally, agriculture is under a lot of pressure due to rising population and corresponding increases in food demand. However, several variables, including improper mechanization, limited arable land, and the presence of several biotic and abiotic pressures, continually impact agricultural productivity. Drought is a notable destructive abiotic stress and may be the most serious challenge confronting sustainable agriculture, resulting in a significant crop output deficiency. Numerous morphological and physiological changes occur in plants as a result of drought stress. Hence, there is a need to create mitigation techniques since these changes might permanently harm the plant. Current methods used to reduce the effects of drought stress include the use of film farming, super-absorbent hydrogels, nanoparticles, biochar, and drought-resistant plant cultivars. However, most of these activities are money and labor-intensive, which offer limited plant improvement. The use of plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) has proven to be a preferred method that offers several indirect and direct advantages in drought mitigation. PGPB are critical biological elements which have favorable impacts on plants’ biochemical and physiological features, leading to improved sugar production, relative water content, leaf number, ascorbic acid levels, and photosynthetic pigment quantities. This present review revisited the impacts of PGPB in ameliorating the detrimental effects of drought stress on plants, explored the mechanism of action employed, as well as the major challenges encountered in their application for plant growth and development.

Water Conservation and Plant Survival Strategies of Rhizobacteria under Drought Stress

Drylands are stressful environment for plants growth and production. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) acts as a rampart against the adverse impacts of drought stress in drylands and enhances plant growth and is helpful in agricultural sustainability. PGPR improves drought tolerance by implicating physio-chemical modifications called rhizobacterial-induced drought endurance and resilience (RIDER). The RIDER response includes; alterations of phytohormonal levels, metabolic adjustments, production of bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS), biofilm formation, and antioxidant resistance, including the accumulation of many suitable organic solutes such as carbohydrates, amino acids, and polyamines. Modulation of moisture status by these PGPRs is one of the primary mechanisms regulating plant growth, but studies on their effect on plant survival are scarce in sandy/desert soil. It was found that inoculated plants showed high tolerance to water-deficient conditions by delaying dehydration and maintaining the plant’s water status at an optimal level. PGPR inoculated plants had a high recovery rate after rewatering interms of similar biomass at flowering compared to non-stressed plants. These rhizobacteria enhance plant tolerance and also elicit induced systemic resistance of plants to water scarcity. PGPR also improves the root growth and root architecture, thereby improving nutrient and water uptake. PGPR promoted accumulation of stress-responsive plant metabolites such as amino acids, sugars, and sugar alcohols. These metabolites play a substantial role in regulating plant growth and development and strengthen the plant’s defensive system against various biotic and abiotic stresses, in particular drought stress.

Tracing membrane biofouling to the microbial community structure and its metabolic products: An investigation on the three-stage MBR combined with worm reactor process

The biofouling characteristics of an MBR (S-MBR) combined with the worm reactor and a conventional MBR (C-MBR) were analyzed, respectively, over the three-stage (fast-slow-fast) process. Whether it was in the C-MBR or the S-MBR, the species of the active sludge (AS) were similar to that of the cake sludge (CS) in stage 1 (before day 1), the bacterial adsorption and the metabolites attachment contributed to this transmembrane pressure (TMP) rise. In the stage 2, the TMP increasing rate of the C-MBR was eight times more than that of the S-MBR. During this period, a characteristic community colonized the AS and CS of the S-MBR with the microbes, ie Flavobacteria, Firmicutes and Chloroflexi which were responsible for the degradation of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP). These dominant species caused the slower accumulation of biofouling metabolites in the CS, resulting in the slow rise-related in TMP. Meanwhile, the enrichment of β-proteobacterium and the absence of Mycobacterium and Propionibacterium in AS and CS of the C-MBR were deemed as the main biological factors bringing about the rise-associated in TMP. In the stage 3, the biofilm was matured, and the cake layer was more compacted, which resulted in an abrupt rise in TMP and severe membrane fouling. Additionally, the statistical analysis revealed that a highly correlation between the TMP increasing rate and the content of carbonhydrates in SMP (SMP_c). When the SMP_c content increased slowly, there was a relatively slow biofouling. But, when the SMP_c increasing rate was greater, it led to a more serious membrane fouling with the sudden TMP jump. Additionally, there was also a highly significant correlation coefficient for the TMP rise and the content of carbonhydrates in EPS (EPS_c) and the protein in SMP (SMP_p), rather than the protein in EPS (EPS_p). The cluster analysis showed that the microbes contributing to membrane fouling were more abundant in the C-MBR, while the microbes related to organic compounds degradation were more abundant in the S-MBR. There was significant correlation between the microbes and their metabolites. The SMP_c in conjunction with EPS_c and SMP_p were the main factors accelerating the membrane fouling. It was concluded that a quick rise in SMP_c triggered an abrupt increase in TMP, while the EPS_c and SMP_p caused the sustained increase in TMP.