Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction with a New Expandable Device for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination with Preservation of the C2 Nerve Root: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study

Novelties for increased safety in cranio-vertebral surgery: a review

The cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) was formerly considered a surgical "no man's land" due to its complex anatomical and biomechanical features. Surgical approaches and hardware instrumentation have had to be tailored in order to achieve successful outcomes. Nowadays, thanks to the ongoing development of new technologies and surgical techniques, CVJ surgery has come to be widely performed in many spine centers. Accordingly, there is a drive to explore novel solutions and technological nuances that make CVJ surgery safer, faster, and more precise. Improved outcome in CVJ surgery has been achieved thanks to increased safety allowing for reduction in complication rates. The Authors present the latest technological advancements in CVJ surgery in terms of imaging, biomaterials, navigation, robotics, customized implants, 3D-printed technology, video-assisted approaches and neuromonitoring.

Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction and Fusion with DTRAX Intra-Articular Cages: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Review of the Pertinent Literature

PURPOSE

Atlantoaxial joint distraction is a key procedure for the treatment of selected patients affected by basilar invagination (BI). In recent years, several authors have reported various techniques of distraction and fixation of the C1-C2 joint using different types of intra-articular spacers, with or without posterior fixation. We review the pertinent literature and propose a feasibility study on the use of a new device for the distraction of the C1-C2 joint aimed to the descent of the dens out of the foramen magnum suggesting its application on selected cases of BI.

METHODS

The GL-DTRAX Cervical Cage-SE is a cage approved by the Food and Drug Administration for distraction and fixation of subaxial cervical spine. Five adult cadaveric specimens were dissected surgically to evaluate the feasibility of DTRAX insertion inside the C1-C2 joint through a posterior approach.

RESULTS

The cages were uneventfully set into the C1-C2 intra-articular space of all samples without the need to sacrifice C2 nerve roots and ganglia. Postoperative cervical computed tomography scanning confirmed the correct fitting of the devices in every sample.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric study highlights the feasibility of the DTRAX cage as a C1-C2 intra-articular device producing a substantial distraction of atlantoaxial complex and suggesting a possible therapeutic role in selected cases of BI.