3D Total Variation Minimization Filter for Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging

An Enhanced Visualization of DBT Imaging Using Blind Deconvolution and Total Variation Minimization Regularization

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) presents out-of-plane artifacts caused by features of high intensity. Given observed data and knowledge about the point spread function (PSF), deconvolution techniques recover data from a blurred version. However, a correct PSF is difficult to achieve and these methods amplify noise. When no information is available about the PSF, blind deconvolution can be used. Additionally, Total Variation (TV) minimization algorithms have achieved great success due to its virtue of preserving edges while reducing image noise. This work presents a novel approach in DBT through the study of out-of-plane artifacts using blind deconvolution and noise regularization based on TV minimization. Gradient information was also included. The methodology was tested using real phantom data and one clinical data set. The results were investigated using conventional 2D slice-by-slice visualization and 3D volume rendering. For the 2D analysis, the artifact spread function (ASF) and Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHMM_ASF) of the ASF were considered. The 3D quantitative analysis was based on the FWHM of disks profiles at 90°, noise and signal to noise ratio (SNR) at 0° and 90°. A marked visual decrease of the artifact with reductions of FWHM_ASF (2D) and FWHM_90° (volume rendering) of 23.8% and 23.6%, respectively, was observed. Although there was an expected increase in noise level, SNR values were preserved after deconvolution. Regardless of the methodology and visualization approach, the objective of reducing the out-of-plane artifact was accomplished. Both for the phantom and clinical case, the artifact reduction in the z was markedly visible.

Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction

PURPOSE

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been shown to somewhat alleviate the breast tissue overlapping issues of two-dimensional (2D) mammography. However, the improvement in current DBT systems over mammography is still limited. Statistical image reconstruction (SIR) methods have the potential to reduce through-plane artifacts in DBT, and thus may be used to further reduce anatomical clutter. The purpose of this work was to study the impact of SIR on anatomical clutter in the reconstructed DBT image volumes.

METHODS

An SIR with a slice-wise total variation (TV) regularizer was implemented to reconstruct DBT images which were compared with the clinical reconstruction method (filtered backprojection). The artifact spread function (ASF) was measured to quantify the reduction of the through-plane artifacts level in phantom studies and microcalcifications in clinical cases. The anatomical clutter was quantified by the anatomical noise power spectrum with a power law fitting model: NPSa ( f) = α f-β . The β values were measured from the reconstructed image slices when the two reconstruction methods were applied to a cohort of clinical breast exams (N = 101) acquired using Hologic Selenia Dimensions DBT systems.

RESULTS

The full width half maximum (FWHM) of the measured ASF was reduced from 8.7 ± 0.1 mm for clinical reconstruction to 6.5 ± 0.1 mm for SIR which yields a 25% reduction in FWHM in phantom studies and the same amount of ASF reduction was also found in clinical measurements from microcalcifications. The measured β values for the two reconstruction methods were 3.17 ± 0.36 and 2.14 ± 0.39 for the clinical reconstruction method and the SIR method, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (P << 0.001). The dependence of β on slice location using either method was negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistical image reconstruction enabled a significant reduction of both the through-plane artifacts level and anatomical clutter in the DBT reconstructions. The β value was found to be β≈2.14 with the SIR method. This value stays in the middle between the β≈1.8 for cone beam CT and β≈3.2 for mammography. In contrast, the measured β value in the clinical reconstructions (β≈3.17) remains close to that of mammography.