Transoral Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction: A Neuronavigated Cadaver Study

Craniovertebral Junction Surgical Approaches: State of Art

Surgical approaches directed toward craniovertebral junction (CVJ) can be addressed to the ventral, dorsal, and lateral aspects through a variety of 360° surgical corridors Herein, we report features, advantages, and limits of the updated technical support in CVJ surgery in clinical setting and dissection laboratories enriched by our preliminary surgical results of the simultaneous application of O-arm intraoperative neuronavigation and imaging system along with the 3D-4K EX in TOA for the treatment of CVJ pathologies.In the past 4 years, eight patients harboring CVJ compressive pathologies underwent one-step combined anterior neurosurgical decompression and posterior instrumentation and fusion technique with the aid of exoscope and O-arm. In our equipped Cranio-Vertebral Junction Laboratory, we use fresh cadavers (and injected "head and neck" specimens) whose policy, protocols, and logistics have already been elucidated in previous works. Five fresh-frozen adult specimens were dissected adopting an FLA. In these specimens, a TOA was also performed, as well as a neuronavigation-assisted comparison between transoral and transnasal explorable distances.A complete decompression along with stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ was accomplished in all the cases at the maximum follow-up (mean: 25.3 months). In two cases, the O-arm navigation allowed the identification of residual compression that was not clearly visible using the microscope alone. In four cases, it was not possible to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi due to the angled projection unfitting with the neuronavigation optical system, so misleading the surgeon and strongly suggesting changing surgical strategy intraoperatively. In another case (case 4), it was possible to navigate and perform both C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi screwing, but the screw placement was suboptimal at the immediate postoperative radiological assessment. In this case, the hardware displacement occurred 2 months later requiring reoperation.

Multidisciplinary approach to the craniovertebral junction. Historical insights, current and future perspectives in the neurosurgical and otorhinolaryngological alliance

Historically considered as a nobody’s land, craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery or specialty recently gained high consideration as symbol of challenging surgery as well as selective top level qualifying surgery. The alliance between Neurosurgeons and Otorhinolaringologists has become stronger in the time. CVJ has unique anatomical bone and neurovascular structures architecture. It not only separates from the subaxial cervical spine but it also provides a special cranial flexion, extension, and axial rotation pattern. Stability is provided by a complex combination of osseous and ligamentous supports which allows a large degree of motion. The perfect knowledge of CVJ anatomy and physiology allows to better understand surgical procedures of the occiput, atlas and axis and the specific diseases that affect the region. Although many years passed since the beginning of this pioneering surgery, managing lesions situated in the anterior aspect of the CVJ still remains a challenging neurosurgical problem. Many studies are available in the literature so far aiming to examine the microsurgical anatomy of both the anterior and posterior extradural and intradural aspects of the CVJ as well as the differences in all the possible surgical exposures obtained by 360° approach philosophy. Herein we provide a short but quite complete at glance tour across the personal experience and publications and the more recent literature available in order to highlight where this alliance between Neurosurgeon and Otorhinolaringologist is mandatory, strongly advisable or unnecessary.

A 360° Approach to the Craniovertebral Junction in a Cadaveric Laboratory Setting: Historical Insights, Current, and Future Perspectives in a Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

We herein outline the experience matured in our equipped Cranio-Vertebral Junction Laboratory for anatomic dissection.

METHODS

An extreme lateral approach (ELA) was performed on 4 fresh cadavers and submandibular approach was performed on 5. An endoscope and navigation-assisted far lateral approach (FLA) was performed in 5 injected specimens. In these specimens, a transoral approach was also performed, as well as a neuronavigation-assisted comparison between transoral and transnasal explorable distances.

RESULTS

As calculated with neuronavigation, statistically significant differences both in the explored craniocaudal (P = 0.003) and lateral (P = 0.008) distances were observed between the transoral approach and endoscopic endonasal approach. In FLA, neuronavigation facilitated identification and partial removal of the occipital condyle; in one case, during endoscopic intradural exploration, tearing of the emerging roots of the 11th cranial nerve occurred. In ELA, the site where the accessory nerve pierces into the sternocleidomastoid muscle was found at a distance from the tip of the mastoid between 3 and 4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

During dissections, as in the clinical setting, endoscope and image guidance give the surgeon a constant orientation, increasing the accuracy and the safety of the approach. Nonetheless, the encumbrance of the endoscope could represent a limit in deep and narrow corridors as those running across the craniovertebral junction, especially in "oblique" FLA and ELA, in which the surgical target is often hidden by a delicate tangle of nerves and vessels. Its use appears more suitable and safer in "straight" approaches as transoral and transnasal in which there are no neurovascular structures interposed.