Psychosocial Needs of Head and Neck Cancer Patients and the Role of the Clinical Social Worker

Head and neck cancer patient journey's health literacy: a multidisciplinary team perspective. VOICE study

PURPOSE

Health literacy is a current Public Health priority in Portugal. The participation of well-informed patients in their care and shared decision making are essential, especially in chronic aggressive and debilitating pathologies such as recurrent or metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).

AIMS

This study aimed to characterize R/M HNSCC patients' and caregivers' information needs identified by healthcare professionals (HCPs).

METHODS

Two online Focus Groups, one with only medical doctors and the other with other HCPs involved in the treatment of R/M HNSCC patients, were conducted, using a modified Metaplan, Lean or adapted PDCA methodology. The discussions were audio recorded in full and content analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti qualitative data analysis software.

RESULTS

Topics addressed were diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and global evaluation. In general, all experts agreed that only essential information should be cautiously given, according to patients' and caregivers' wishes. It was consensual that patients are given the necessary information to adhere to treatment. Two main barriers were identified: one barrier was associated with verbal communication due to the lack of health literacy of these patients, and the other barrier regarded healthcare access. It was also considered important to remind patients of the daily and social activities that they could and should maintain, as well as providing sufficient social resources and problem-solving training to caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study highlights the complexity of R/M HNSCC patients' care. Immediate availability of psychologists and psychiatrists should be implemented in all centers that treat HNSCC patients. The differences found between the physicians' Focus Group and other HCPs' Focus Group in some of the addressed topics emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach, in a biomedical model integrated with a biopsychosocial model.

Emotional Distress and Financial Toxicity in Younger Adult Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

There has been an alarming increase in the number of young adults diagnosed with cancer. The emotional, psychosocial, and financial distress experienced by newly diagnosed young adults undergoing cancer surgery remains largely unknown.

METHODS

A validated biopsychosocial distress screening tool (SupportScreen®) was administered to patients diagnosed with cancer prior to surgery between 2009 and 2017 in a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients were stratified into younger adults ≤45 years (YA) and older adults >45 years (OA). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze distress outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 4,297 patients were identified, with YA comprising 13.3% (n=573) of the cohort. YA reported higher emotional distress, including increased anxiety (33.8% vs. 27.4%, P=0.002), greater fear of procedures (26.7% vs. 22%, P=0.018), and difficulty managing emotions (26% vs. 20.7%, P=0.006). YA struggled more frequently to manage work/school (29.5% vs. 19.3%, P<0.001), finding resources (17.8% vs. 11.8%, P<0.001), changes in physical appearance (22.2% vs. 13.4%, P<0.001), fatigue (36% vs. 27.3%, P<0.001), and ability to have children (18.4% vs. 3%, P<0.001). Financial toxicity was significantly higher in the YA group (40.5% vs. 28%, P<0.001). While income level was strongly protective against emotional distress and financial toxicity in OAs, it was less protective against the risk of financial toxicity in YA. Younger age was an independent predictor of financial toxicity in a model adjusted to income (OR-1.52, P=0.020).

CONCLUSION

Younger adults in the prime of their personal and professional years of productivity require special attention when undergoing surgical evaluation for cancer. Resource allocation and counseling interventions should be integrated as part of their routine care to expedite their return to optimal physical and holistic health and mitigate psychosocial distress and financial toxicity.

Psychosocial and Clinical Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Care

Purpose

Patient satisfaction with healthcare was recognized as an indispensable component of healthcare quality assurance programs for decades. Limited research has explored psychosocial variables impacting patient satisfaction with cancer care. The objective of our study was to identify the level of patient satisfaction with cancer care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and determine the psychosocial and clinical predictors of patient satisfaction.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in 2018–2019 with patients with cancer at the Outpatient Oncology Clinic at King Saud University Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire contained a visual analog scale (VAS) of satisfaction with cancer care, a VAS of satisfaction with social support, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression scale, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale.

Results

Out of the 400 patients approached, 280 agreed to participate in the study. Of the 280 patients participating in the study, 65% were satisfied with cancer care. Higher satisfaction was associated with being non-Saudi, being employed, having fewer household residents (≤4), being satisfied with social support, not receiving radiotherapy, and receiving hormonal or biological therapy. Having anxiety or depression was also associated with lower satisfaction. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, being satisfied with social support, having ≤ 4 household residents, receiving hormonal therapy, and receiving biological therapy rather than radiotherapy were all independent predictors of higher satisfaction with cancer care.

Conclusion

This study found an inadequate level of patient satisfaction with cancer care. Higher levels of satisfaction were associated with being satisfied with social support, using biological and hormonal therapy, while lower satisfaction was associated with a larger number of household residents (>4), depression, anxiety and using radiotherapy.