1
|
Gule-Monroe MK, Calle S, Policeni B, Juliano AF, Agarwal M, Chow LQM, Dubey P, Friedman ER, Hagiwara M, Hanrahan KD, Jain V, Rath TJ, Smith RB, Subramaniam RM, Taheri MR, Yom SS, Zander D, Burns J. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Post-Therapy Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S521-S564. [PMID: 38040469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susana Calle
- Research Author, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruno Policeni
- Panel Chair, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Amy F Juliano
- Panel Vice-Chair, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mohit Agarwal
- Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Laura Q M Chow
- University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | | | | | - Mari Hagiwara
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Vikas Jain
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Russell B Smith
- Baptist Medical Center, Jacksonville, Florida; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- University of Otago, Dunedin, Otepoti, New Zealand; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - M Reza Taheri
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Judah Burns
- Specialty Chair, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Subramaniam N, Poptani H, Schache A, Bhat V, Iyer S, Sunil HV, Chandrasekhar N, Pillai V, Chaturvedi P, Krishna S, Krishnamurthy A, Kekatpure V, Kuriakose M, Iyer NG, Thakkar A, Kantharia R, Sonkar A, Shetty V, Rangappa V, Kolur T, Vidhyadharan S, Murthy S, Kudpaje A, Srinivasalu V, Mahajan A. Imaging advances in oral cavity cancer and perspectives from a population in need: Consensus from the UK-India oral cancer imaging group. JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_10_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
3
|
Ernst BP, Reissig MR, Strieth S, Eckrich J, Hagemann JH, Döge J, Matthias C, Gouveris H, Rübenthaler J, Weiss R, Sommer WH, Nörenberg D, Huber T, Gonser P, Becker S, Froelich MF. The role of structured reporting and structured operation planning in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242804. [PMID: 33253265 PMCID: PMC7703956 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) scans represent the gold standard in the planning of functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS). Yet, radiologists and otolaryngologists have different perspectives on these scans. In general, residents often struggle with aspects involved in both reporting and operation planning. The aim of this study was to compare the completeness of structured reports (SR) of preoperative CT images and structured operation planning (SOP) to conventional reports (CR) and conventional operation planning (COP) to potentially improve future treatment decisions on an individual level. In total, 30 preoperative CT scans obtained for surgical planning of patients scheduled for FESS were evaluated using SR and CR by radiology residents. Subsequently, otolaryngology residents performed a COP using free texts and a SOP using a specific template. All radiology reports and operation plannings were evaluated by two experienced FESS surgeons regarding their completeness for surgical planning. User satisfaction of otolaryngology residents was assessed by using visual analogue scales. Overall radiology report completeness was significantly higher using SRs regarding surgically important structures compared to CRs (84.4 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). SOPs produced significantly higher completeness ratings (97% vs. 39.4%, p<0.001) regarding pathologies and anatomical variances. Moreover, time efficiency was not significantly impaired by implementation of SR (148 s vs. 160 s, p = 0.61) and user satisfaction was significantly higher for SOP (VAS 8.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.001). Implementation of SR and SOP results in a significantly increased completeness of radiology reports and operation planning for FESS. Consequently, the combination of both facilitates surgical planning and may decrease potential risks during FESS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Philipp Ernst
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Manuel René Reissig
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Sebastian Strieth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Jonas Eckrich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Jan H. Hagemann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Julia Döge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Christoph Matthias
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | - Haralampos Gouveris
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
| | | | - Roxanne Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany
| | - Wieland H. Sommer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Dominik Nörenberg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Huber
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Phillipp Gonser
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ernst BP, Katzer F, Künzel J, Hodeib M, Strieth S, Eckrich J, Tattermusch A, Froelich MF, Matthias C, Sommer WH, Becker S. Impact of structured reporting on developing head and neck ultrasound skills. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 19:102. [PMID: 30971248 PMCID: PMC6458758 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1538-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reports of head and neck ultrasound examinations are frequently written by hand as free texts. This is a serious obstacle to the learning process of the modality due to a missing report structure and terminology. Therefore, there is a great inter-observer variability in overall report quality. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of structured reporting on the learning process as indicated by the overall report quality of head and neck ultrasound examinations within medical school education. METHODS Following an immersion course on head and neck ultrasound, previously documented images of three common pathologies were handed out to 58 medical students who asked to create both standard free text reports (FTR) and structured reports (SR). A template for structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations was created using a web-based approach. FTRs and SRs were evaluated with regard to overall quality, completeness, required time to completion and readability by two independent raters (Paired Wilcoxon test, 95% CI). Ratings were assessed for inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' kappa). Additionally, a questionnaire was utilized to evaluate user satisfaction. RESULTS SRs received significantly better ratings in terms of report completeness (97.7% vs. 53.5%, p < 0.001) regarding all items. In addition, pathologies were described in more detail using SRs (70% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001). Readability was significantly higher in all SRs when compared to FTRs (100% vs. 54.4%, p < 0.001). Mean time to complete was significantly lower (79.6 vs. 205.4 s, p < 0.001) and user satisfaction was significantly higher when using SRs (8.5 vs. 4.1, p < 0.001). Also, inter-rater reliability was very high (Fleiss' kappa 0.93). CONCLUSIONS SRs of head and neck ultrasound examinations provide more detailed information with a better readability in a time-saving manner within medical education. Also, medical students may benefit from SRs in their learning process due to the structured approach and standardized terminology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P. Ernst
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Fabian Katzer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Julian Künzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Mohamed Hodeib
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Strieth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jonas Eckrich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Matthias
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Wieland H. Sommer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|