(177)Lu/ (90)Y intermediate-affinity monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR and HER2/c-neu: preparation and preclinical evaluation

Intracavitary radioimmunotherapy of high-grade gliomas: present status and future developments

There is a distinct need for new and second-line therapies to delay or prevent local tumor regrowth after current standard of care therapy. Intracavitary radioimmunotherapy, in combination with radiotherapy, is discussed in the present review as a therapeutic strategy of high potential. We performed a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The available body of literature on intracavitary radioimmunotherapy (iRIT) in glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytomas is presented. Several past and current phase I and II clinical trials, using mostly an anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody labeled with I-131, have shown median overall survival of 19-25 months in glioblastoma, while adverse events remain low. Tenascin, followed by EGFR and variants, or smaller peptides have been used as targets, and most clinical studies were performed with I-131 or Y-90 as radionuclides while only recently Re-188, I-125, and Bi-213 were applied. The pharmacokinetics of iRIT, as well as the challenges encountered with this therapy, is comprehensively discussed. This promising approach deserves further exploration in future studies by incorporating several innovative modifications.

Dosimetry methods and clinical applications in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: a literature review

Background

The main challenge for systemic radiation therapy using radiopharmaceuticals (SRT) is to optimise the dose delivered to the tumour, while minimising normal tissue irradiation. Dosimetry could help to increase therapy response and decrease toxicity after SRT by individual treatment planning. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an accepted SRT treatment option for irresectable and metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, dosimetry in PRRT is not routinely performed, mainly due to the lack of evidence in literature and clinical implementation difficulties. The goal of this review is to provide insight in dosimetry methods and requirements and to present an overview of clinical aspects of dosimetry in PRRT for NET.

Methods

A PubMed query including the search criteria dosimetry, radiation dose, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and radionuclide therapy was performed. Articles were selected based on title and abstract, and description of dosimetric approach.

Results

A total of 288 original articles were included. The most important dosimetry methods, their main advantages and limitations, and implications in the clinical setting are discussed. An overview of dosimetry in clinical studies regarding PRRT treatment for NET is provided.

Conclusion

Clinical dosimetry in PRRT is feasible and can result in improved treatment outcomes. Current clinical dosimetry studies focus on safety and apply non-voxel-based dosimetry methods. Personalised treatment using sophisticated dosimetry methods to assess tumour and normal tissue uptake in clinical trials is the next step towards routine dosimetry in PRRT for NET.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0443-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2

Since the approval of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), 3 other HER2-targeting agents have gained regulatory approval: lapatinib, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab-emtansine. These agents have revolutionized the management of HER2-positive breast cancer, highlighting the concept that targeted therapies are successful when patients exhibit tumor-selective expression of a molecular target-in this case, HER2. However, response prediction and innate or acquired resistance remain serious concerns. Predictive biomarkers of a response-which could help in the selection of patients who might benefit from a selected targeted therapy-are currently lacking. Molecular imaging with anti-HER2 probes allows the noninvasive, whole-body assessment of HER2 tumor burden and has the potential to improve patient selection, optimize the dose and schedule, and rationalize assessment of the response to anti-HER2 therapies. Furthermore, unlike biopsy-based HER2 assessment, this approach can reveal inter- or intratumoral heterogeneity as well as variations in HER2 expression over time. This review summarizes the available literature and the current status of molecular imaging as a tool for the assessment of HER2 (target) expression or the prediction of an early treatment response in early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.