ECM Remodeling in Angiogenesis. In: Reinhart-king CA, editor. Mechanical and Chemical Signaling in Angiogenesis. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. pp. 185-209. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30856-7_9]

Tunable Synthetic Hydrogels to Study Angiogenic Sprouting

Angiogenic sprouting, the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vasculature, is tightly regulated by the properties of the surrounding tissue microenvironment. Although the extracellular matrix has been shown to be a major regulator of this process, it is not clear how individual biochemical and mechanical properties influence endothelial cell sprouting. This information gap is largely due to the lack of suitable in vitro models that recapitulate angiogenic sprouting in a 3D environment with independent control over matrix properties. Here, we present protocols for the preparation of endothelial cell spheroid-laden synthetic, dextran-based hydrogels, which serve as a highly tunable 3D scaffold. The adjustment of the hydrogels' adhesiveness, stiffness, and degradability is demonstrated in detail. Finally, we describe assays to elucidate how individual matrix properties regulate angiogenic sprouting, including their analysis by immunofluorescence staining and imaging. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Synthesis of methacrylated dextran (DexMA) Basic Protocol 2: Generation of endothelial cell spheroids in microwells Basic Protocol 3: Endothelial cell sprouting in hydrogels of tunable stiffness Basic Protocol 4: Endothelial cell sprouting in hydrogels of tunable adhesiveness Basic Protocol 5: Endothelial cell sprouting in hydrogels of tunable degradability Basic Protocol 6: Imaging of endothelial cell spheroid-laden hydrogels Support Protocol 1: Preparation of pro-angiogenic cocktail for endothelial cell sprouting.

A Parallel-Plate Flow Chamber for Mechanical Characterization of Endothelial Cells Exposed to Laminar Shear Stress

Shear stresses induced by laminar fluid flow are essential to properly recapitulate the physiological microenvironment experienced by endothelial cells (ECs). ECs respond to these stresses via mechanotransduction by modulating their phenotype and biomechanical characteristics, which can be characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Parallel Plate Flow Chambers (PPFCs) apply unidirectional laminar fluid flow to EC monolayers in vitro. Since ECs in sealed PPFCs are inaccessible to AFM probes, cone-and-plate viscometers (CPs) are commonly used to apply shear stress. This paper presents a comparison of the efficacies of both methods. Computational Fluid Dynamic simulation and validation testing using EC responses as a metric have indicated limitations in the use of CPs to apply laminar shear stress. Monolayers subjected to laminar fluid flow in a PPFC respond by increasing cortical stiffness, elongating, and aligning filamentous actin in the direction of fluid flow to a greater extent than CP devices. Limitations using CP devices to provide laminar flow across an EC monolayer suggest they are better suited when studying EC response for disturbed flow conditions. PPFC platforms allow for exposure of ECs to laminar fluid flow conditions, recapitulating cellular biomechanical behaviors, whereas CP platforms allow for mechanical characterization of ECs under secondary flow.