Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Prediction Based on an SVR Ensemble

PreDBA: A heterogeneous ensemble approach for predicting protein-DNA binding affinity

The interaction between protein and DNA plays an essential function in various critical natural processes, like DNA replication, transcription, splicing, and repair. Studying the binding affinity of proteins to DNA helps to understand the recognition mechanism of protein-DNA complexes. Since there are still many limitations on the protein-DNA binding affinity data measured by experiments, accurate and reliable calculation methods are necessarily required. So we put forward a computational approach in this paper, called PreDBA, that can forecast protein-DNA binding affinity effectively by using heterogeneous ensemble models. One hundred protein-DNA complexes are manually collected from the related literature as a data set for protein-DNA binding affinity. Then, 52 sequence and structural features are obtained. Based on this, the correlation between these 52 characteristics and protein-DNA binding affinity is calculated. Furthermore, we found that the protein-DNA binding affinity is affected by the DNA molecule structure of the compound. We classify all protein-DNA compounds into five classifications based on the DNA structure related to the proteins that make up the protein-DNA complexes. In each group, a stacked heterogeneous ensemble model is constructed based on the obtained features. In the end, based on the binding affinity data set, we used the leave-one-out cross-validation to evaluate the proposed method comprehensively. In the five categories, the Pearson correlation coefficient values of our recommended method range from 0.735 to 0.926. We have demonstrated the advantages of the proposed method compared to other machine learning methods and currently existing protein-DNA binding affinity prediction approach.

Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data

Background

One goal of structural biology is to understand how a protein’s 3-dimensional conformation determines its capacity to interact with potential ligands. In the case of small chemical ligands, deconstructing a static protein-ligand complex into its constituent atom-atom interactions is typically sufficient to rapidly predict ligand affinity with high accuracy (>70% correlation between predicted and experimentally-determined affinity), a fact that is exploited to support structure-based drug design. We recently found that protein-DNA/RNA affinity can also be predicted with high accuracy using extensions of existing techniques, but protein-protein affinity could not be predicted with >60% correlation, even when the protein-protein complex was available.

Methods

X-ray and NMR structures of protein-protein complexes, their associated binding affinities and experimental conditions were obtained from different binding affinity and structural databases. Statistical models were implemented using a generalized linear model framework, including the experimental conditions as new model features. We evaluated the potential for new features to improve affinity prediction models by calculating the Pearson correlation between predicted and experimental binding affinities on the training and test data after model fitting and after cross-validation. Differences in accuracy were assessed using two-sample t test and nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Here we evaluate a range of potential factors that may interfere with accurate protein-protein affinity prediction. We find that X-ray crystal resolution has the strongest single effect on protein-protein affinity prediction. Limiting our analyses to only high-resolution complexes (≤2.5 Å) increased the correlation between predicted and experimental affinity from 54 to 68% (p = 4.32x10⁻³). In addition, incorporating information on the experimental conditions under which affinities were measured (pH, temperature and binding assay) had significant effects on prediction accuracy. We also highlight a number of potential errors in large structure-affinity databases, which could affect both model training and accuracy assessment.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the accuracy of statistical models for protein-protein affinity prediction may be limited by the information present in databases used to train new models. Improving our capacity to integrate large-scale structural and functional information may be required to substantively advance our understanding of the general principles by which a protein’s structure determines its function.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1533-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening

Docking tools to predict whether and how a small molecule binds to a target can be applied if a structural model of such target is available. The reliability of docking depends, however, on the accuracy of the adopted scoring function (SF). Despite intense research over the years, improving the accuracy of SFs for structure-based binding affinity prediction or virtual screening has proven to be a challenging task for any class of method. New SFs based on modern machine-learning regression models, which do not impose a predetermined functional form and thus are able to exploit effectively much larger amounts of experimental data, have recently been introduced. These machine-learning SFs have been shown to outperform a wide range of classical SFs at both binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. The emerging picture from these studies is that the classical approach of using linear regression with a small number of expert-selected structural features can be strongly improved by a machine-learning approach based on nonlinear regression allied with comprehensive data-driven feature selection. Furthermore, the performance of classical SFs does not grow with larger training datasets and hence this performance gap is expected to widen as more training data becomes available in the future. Other topics covered in this review include predicting the reliability of a SF on a particular target class, generating synthetic data to improve predictive performance and modeling guidelines for SF development. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2015, 5:405-424. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1225 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Different combinations of atomic interactions predict protein-small molecule and protein-DNA/RNA affinities with similar accuracy

Interactions between proteins and other molecules play essential roles in all biological processes. Although it is widely held that a protein's ligand specificity is determined primarily by its three‐dimensional structure, the general principles by which structure determines ligand binding remain poorly understood. Here we use statistical analyses of a large number of protein−ligand complexes with associated binding‐affinity measurements to quantitatively characterize how combinations of atomic interactions contribute to ligand affinity. We find that there are significant differences in how atomic interactions determine ligand affinity for proteins that bind small chemical ligands, those that bind DNA/RNA and those that interact with other proteins. Although protein‐small molecule and protein‐DNA/RNA binding affinities can be accurately predicted from structural data, models predicting one type of interaction perform poorly on the others. Additionally, the particular combinations of atomic interactions required to predict binding affinity differed between small‐molecule and DNA/RNA data sets, consistent with the conclusion that the structural bases determining ligand affinity differ among interaction types. In contrast to what we observed for small‐molecule and DNA/RNA interactions, no statistical models were capable of predicting protein−protein affinity with >60% correlation. We demonstrate the potential usefulness of protein‐DNA/RNA binding prediction as a possible tool for high‐throughput virtual screening to guide laboratory investigations, suggesting that quantitative characterization of diverse molecular interactions may have practical applications as well as fundamentally advancing our understanding of how molecular structure translates into function. Proteins 2015; 83:2100–2114. © 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.