Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients

Value of spectral CT parameters in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

AIM

To investigate the value of pre-chemotherapy spectral computed tomography (CT) parameters in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in gastric cancer (GC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with GC who received NAC and underwent spectral CT examination before chemotherapy were enrolled retrospectively and divided into a responsive group and a non-responsive group according to the postoperative pathological tumour regression grade. Clinical characteristics were collected. The iodine concentration (IC), water concentration (WC), and effective atomic number (Eff-Z) of the portal venous phases were measured before chemotherapy, and IC was normalised to that of the aorta to provide the normalised IC (NIC). An independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, or chi-square test was used to analyse the differences between the two groups, and the receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance of different variables.

RESULTS

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was lower in the responsive group than in the non-responsive group (p<0.05). IC, NIC, and Eff-Z values were significantly higher in the responsive group than in the non-responsive group (p<0.01). The areas under the ROC curves for the NLR, IC, NIC, and Eff-Z were 0.694, 0.688, 0.799, and 0.690, respectively. The combination of NIC, Eff-Z, and NLR values showed good diagnostic performance in predicting response to NAC in GC, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.857, 76.92% sensitivity, 80% accuracy, and 85.71% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Spectral CT parameters may serve as non-invasive tools for predicting the response to NAC in patients with GC.

Imaging advances in efficacy assessment of gastric cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can improve the survival of patients with locally progressive gastric cancer, but chemotherapeutics do not always exhibit good efficacy in all patients. Therefore, accurate preoperative evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant therapy and the appropriate selection of surgery time to minimize toxicity and complications while prolonging patient survival are key issues that need to be addressed. This paper reviews the role of three imaging methods, morphological, functional, radiomics, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging, in evaluating NAC pathological reactions for gastric cancer. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the future application prospects are discussed.

A cohort study and meta-analysis of the evidence for consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Background

The association between the survival or efficacy of chemotherapy and the Lauren subtype of gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. We aimed to clarify whether patients with different Lauren subtypes have different survival after treatment with systemic chemotherapy: intestinal gastric cancer (IGC) patients survived better than patients with mixed type gastric cancer (MGC) or diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) after treatment with systemic chemotherapy.

Patients & methods

Relevant studies for the meta-analysis were identified through searching Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Ovid up to March 2020. We also included our own prospectively collected cohort of patients that were followed over a 10-year period. Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

Results

In our prospective cohort, the overall survival (OS) of IGC patients receiving systemic chemotherapy (chemoIGC) [median OS 5.01 years, interquartile range (IQR) 2.63-6.71] was significantly higher than that of DGC patients receiving the same chemotherapy (chemoDGC) (median OS 1.33 years, IQR 0.78-3.33, p = 0.0001). After adjusting for age, gender and cancer stage, there was a significant difference in OS in patients treated with chemotherapy based on the Lauren classification of GC {hazard ratio (HR) for OS of the IGC versus DGC 0.33, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.65; p < 0.001]}. In the IGC patients, the adjusted HR associated with chemotherapy was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56; p = 0.001), whereas the association was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.30-1.33; p = 0.23) in the DGC patient group.In our meta-analysis, 33 studies comprising 10,246 patients treated with systemic chemotherapy (chemoIGC n = 4888, chemoDGC n = 5358) met all the selection criteria. While we accounted for much of the heterogeneity in these studies, we found that chemoIGC patients showed significantly improved OS [HR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82); p < 0.00001] when compared with similarly treated chemoDGC patients.

Conclusion

Our results support the consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing systemic chemotherapy for GC, particularly for MGC or DGC, which may not benefit from chemotherapy. Lauren classification should be considered to stratify chemotherapy regimens to GC patients in future clinical trials, with particular relevance to MGC or DGC, which is more difficult to treat with current regimens.

Pathological evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Background

Although pathological evaluation has been considered an effective evaluation method, some problems still exist in practice. Therefore, we explored whether there are more reasonable and practical pathological evaluation criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Here, we aim to determine pathological judgment criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Eighty-seven patients with cT2–4 or cN+ were enrolled in this study. Pathological factors for overall survival (OS) were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the pathological criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were then determined.

Results

A total of 87 patients underwent 3–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 67 (77.0%), 15 (17.2%), and 5 (5.8%) receiving Folfox6, Xelox, and SOX regimens, respectively. All patients showed different levels of graded histological regression (GHR) of the primary tumor, with a ≥ 50% regression rate of 50.6%. The univariate analysis showed that GHR ≥ 50% (p = 0.022), 66.7% (p = 0.013), and 90% (p = 0.028) were significantly correlated with OS. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that ypTNM (II/III) stage was significantly associated with OS compared with ypTNM (0+I) stage [HR = 3.553, 95% CI 1.886–6.617; HR = 3.576, 95% CI 1.908–6.703, respectively] and that the Lauren classification of diffuse type was also an independent risk factor for OS compared with the intestinal type (HR = 3.843, 95% CI 1.443–10.237).

Conclusions

The Lauren classification and ypTNM stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors in advanced gastric cancer. A GHR ≥ 50%/< 50% can be used as the primary criterion for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to determine postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a prognostic factor for various cancers. However, there is no study about the role of PLR in predicting response to first-line chemotherapy of metastatic gastric cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to establish whether PLR is associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 273 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer. The best cut-off value of PLR to predict chemotherapeutic response was chosen by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Prognostic significance was determined using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Based on the cut-off value of PLR, patients were divided into a low PLR group and high PLR group. In logistic regression analysis, the low PLR group had a significantly higher disease control rate than the high PLR group had (91.3 vs 76.1%, P=.002), and PLR was an independent risk factor for response to first-line chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.256; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.521-6.969; P=.002). The low PLR group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the high PLR group had (13.4 vs 9.2 months; P=.020). Multivariate survival analysis showed that PLR was significantly associated with OS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.002; 95% CI: 1.000-1.003; P=.020].

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment PLR is associated with the response rate to first-line chemotherapy and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays important roles in the development of gastric cancer. This study aims to analyze the prognostic value of EGFR in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A meta-analysis is performed by searching Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Science Direct databases from Jan 1970 to May 2013. Data are extracted from studies evaluating the survival of gastric cancer patients with either positive or negative EGFR expression. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are calculated.

RESULTS

Totally 1600 cases of gastric cancer patients from five studies are subjected to final analysis. The HR of post-operational survival of patients with positive EGFR expression is 1.16 (95% CI: 0.94-1.43) as compared with those with negative expression, indicating that positive EGFR expression does not significantly predict the poor survival of gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR expression is not an independent predictor for the survival of gastric cancer patients.

Perioperative chemotherapy for resectable gastroesophageal cancer: a single-center experience

BACKGROUNDS

Multimodal treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer has been reported to improve disease-free survival when compared to surgery alone. We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer were treated with perioperative chemotherapy and surgery. The primary end point was the complete resection (R0) rate. Secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, radiological response rate, pathological response rate and downstaging rate. We also looked for prognostic and predictive factors for DFS, OS, pathological complete response and the R0 rate.

RESULTS

Forty patients were found eligible for this retrospective analysis. At diagnosis, 52.5% of patients were classified as stage II and 47.5% were stage III. Forty percent of patients completed three preoperative cycles and three postoperative cycles. A tolerable toxicity related to chemotherapy was found. Thirty-nine patients underwent surgery: 80% reached a complete resection (R0), down-staging was detected in 57.5% and 17.5% had a pathologically complete response. The median time of disease-free survival was 34.05 months (95%CI 25.6-42.4), and the median time of overall survival was 39.01 months (95%CI 30.8-47.1). We found that the presence of comorbidities were independent predictive factors for the pathologic response, while the chemotherapy schedule and the clinical response could independently predict a complete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support that perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer can be safely delivered in daily clinical practice, obtaining an improvement of the pathologic response and the complete resection of gastric cancer.