Tailored chemotherapy to equal toxicity: is it possible?

Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia and Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With First-Line Docetaxel

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is a common side effect associated with docetaxel use. We retrospectively investigated the association between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving first-line docetaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with first-line docetaxel, with known neutrophils value 10 days after first administration, were included in this retrospective analysis. Neutropenia was categorized in Grade 0 to 1 (G0-1), Grade 2 to 3 (G2-3), and Grade 4 (G4). Outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eighty patients were analyzed. Median PFS was 5.4 months in patients with G0-1 neutropenia, 6.9 months with G2-3 neutropenia (hazard ratio [HR] vs. G0-1, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.35; P = .27) and 9.5 months with G4 neutropenia (HR vs. G0-1, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P < .0001). Median OS was 11.6 months in patients with G0-1 neutropenia, 25.5 months in patients with G2-3 neutropenia (HR vs. G0-1, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.80; P = .012) and 39.3 months in patients with G4 neutropenia (HR vs. G0-1, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.41; P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of severe neutropenia showed a statistically significant association with OS (HR G4 vs. G0-1, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.67; P = .013; HR G2-3 vs. G0-1, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.11-1.57; P = .20) and PFS (HR G4 vs. G0-1, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.86; P = .03; HR G2-3 vs. G0-1, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.38-2.96; P = .90).

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel-induced neutropenia is associated with better survival of mCRPC.

Verifying Antineoplastic Dosages Calculated According to Body Surface Area (BSA)

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy makes it mandatory that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column reviews various issues related to the preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, both commercially available and investigational.

Prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and leukopenia is a common side effect. This study assesses whether chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is a predictor of efficacy and whether it is associated with the survival of SCLC patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 445 patients with SCLC who received standard chemotherapy for 4 to 10 cycles. The World Health Organization grading system classifies leukopenia during chemotherapy as follows: absent (grade 0), mild (grades 1 and 2), or severe (grades 3 and 4). The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The association between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia and OS was assessed. According to a multivariate Cox model with time-varying covariates, the hazard ratio of death was significantly lower among patients with mild leukopenia than among patients with severe leukopenia at 0.687 (0.506 to 0.943) and 1.414 (1.147 to 1.744), respectively. The median survival was 13 months (95% CI: 11 to 15 months) for patients who did not experience leukopenia, 17 months (95% CI: 14 to 18 months) for those with mild leukopenia, and 14 months (95% CI: 13 to 16 months) for those with severe leukopenia (absent vs. mild vs. severe leukopenia, P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Leukopenia during chemotherapy is associated with the survival of SCLC patients. Mild leukopenia is strongly associated with longer survival time.

Tumor-related leucocytosis and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: linked or independent prognostic factors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

Tumor-related leucocytosis is a paraneoplastic syndrome that is encountered occasionally in the clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Autonomous production of hematopoietic cytokines (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor) has been identified in some of the patients presenting with this syndrome. In addition to the widely accepted prognostic factors of performance status and disease stage, recently, leucocytosis has been found to be a significant negative prognostic factor for overall survival and time to progression in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC in a pooled analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials, with data from about 1000 patients. A pooled analysis of an Italian Group with data from about 1300 patients has recently shown that neutropenia during chemotherapy is associated with increased survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. Similar results on the independent prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, have been reported by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group in a retrospective analysis on 850 patients. The absence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia can be interpreted as a result of chemotherapy-underdosing. However, considering the negative prognostic value of leucocytosis, another interpretation should be ruled out: a proportion of the patients who do not experience chemotherapy-induced neutropenia may be associated with a worst prognosis because they may be characterized by base-line tumor-related leucocytosis and autonomous production of hematopoietic cytokines protecting them from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Prospective trials are needed to assess if NSCLC-related leucocytosis and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia are two linked or independent prognostic factors for NSCLC. This paper is a review of the available retrospective evidence on the aetiology and prognostic value of tumor-related leucocytosis and on the prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in advanced NSCLC. Moreover we try to hypothesize a possible correlation between these two phenomena and to give suggestions on the prospective evaluation of this hypothetical correlation in the next future.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine (DG) combination represents an alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. One of its more common side effects is neutropenia. The association between the grade of DG-induced neutropenia and the clinical outcome was analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight hundred fifty-eight patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, treated with front-line DG were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the presented worst neutropenia grade: absent (grade 0), mild (grades I/II) and severe (grades III/IV).

RESULTS

Response rate, median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly better in patients developing any grade of neutropenia compared with those without neutropenia. The median TTPs were 3.0, 5.4 and 5.6 months for the groups with absent, mild and severe neutropenia, respectively; the median OSs were 7.9, 12.5 and 11.2 months for the same groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that both mild and severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were independent factors associated with a better TTP and OS survival.

CONCLUSION

Although DG-induced neutropenia was emerged as an independent prognostic factor, it remains to be demonstrated in prospective studies that dose escalation of chemotherapy drugs in patients who do not develop neutropenia may improve the clinical efficacy.

Simultaneous analysis of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and doxorubicinol by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

A method for the simultaneous determination of cyclophosphamide (CP), doxorubicin (dox), and doxorubicinol (dol) was developed and validated to analyze 400 microL of plasma from patients receiving chemotherapeutic treatment with CP and dox. Final calibration ranges for the analytes were 0.440-60.0 microg/mL for cyclophosphamide, 7.20-984 ng/mL for dox and 3.04-104 ng/mL for dol. The samples were prepared using solid phase extraction and analyzed using a gradient separation over a Waters Symmetry C18, 2.1 by 30 mm (Milford, MA) column. Detection was achieved in positive mixed reaction monitoring mode on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.

Study of COX-2, Ki67, and p53 expression to predict effectiveness of 5-flurouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with celecoxib treatment in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) affects cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis of breast cancer, and may also be involved in tumor angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor. Ki67 and p53 are common markers of proliferation and apoptosis in tumor cells. This study investigated the change in expression of COX-2, Ki67, and p53 in solid tumors after the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients were eligible to be treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, with celecoxib (FECC). Tumor tissue samples from 10 patients who, diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma, completed chemotherapy were examined immunohistochemically for COX-2, Ki67, and p53.

RESULTS

From the 60% of patients who expressed COX-2 and 90% who expressed Ki67 and p53 before treatment, 90% of patients revealed a lower intensity staining for each marker after FECC treatment. However, changes in expression of the three markers did not significantly correlate with tumor size, grade, axillary lymph node status. Immunostained slides clearly showed that the diaminobenzidine intensity was markedly reduced after the three-cycle FECC treatment, which implied the combined regimens be effective to the cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a novel relationship between COX-2, Ki67, and p53 expression of human breast invasive ductal carcinomas. This functional relationship provides support for a potential therapeutic role of COX-2 inhibitors in human breast cancer.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treatment efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and myelosuppression is a common side-effect. We aimed to assess whether haematological toxic effects could be a biological measure of drug activity and a marker of efficacy.

METHODS

We analysed data for 1265 patients who received chemotherapy (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, gemcitabine and vinorelbine, cisplatin and vinorelbine, or cisplatin and gemcitabine) within three randomised trials. Primary landmark analyses were restricted to 436 patients who received all six planned chemotherapy cycles and who were alive 180 days after randomisation. Neutropenia was categorised on the basis of worst WHO grade during chemotherapy: absent (grade 0), mild (grade 1-2), or severe (grade 3-4). All statistical analyses were stratified by treatment allocation. Analyses were repeated in the out-of-landmark group (829 patients), stratifying by treatment allocation and number of chemotherapy cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

FINDINGS

In the landmark group, hazard ratios of death were 0.65 (0.46-0.93) for patients with severe neutropenia and 0.74 (0.56-0.98) for those with mild neutropenia. Median survival after the landmark time of 180 days was 31.4 weeks (95% CI 25.7-39.6) for patients without neutropenia compared with 42.0 weeks (32.7-59.7) for patients with severe neutropenia, and with 43.7 weeks (36.6-66.0) for those with mild neutropenia (severe vs mild vs no neutropenia p=0.0118). Findings were much the same for the out-of-landmark group.

INTERPRETATION

Neutropenia during chemotherapy is associated with increased survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and its absence might be a result of underdosing. Prospective trials are needed to assess whether drug dosing guided by the occurrence of toxic effects could improve efficacy of standard regimens.

Are medical oncologists biased in their treatment of the large woman with breast cancer?

PURPOSE

Obesity and breast cancer are common conditions that often coexist. Concerns of relative overdosing of chemotherapy in the large cancer patient have led clinicians to apply empiric dose reductions, 'cap' the body surface area (BSA) at 2 m2, or use ideal rather than actual body weight to calculate BSA. There are no data supporting or refuting these practices and their prevalence is unknown. We sought to determine the distribution of body size and prevalence of obesity in the breast cancer population of our cancer centre, and to determine clinician chemotherapy dosing practices in the era of modern adjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with invasive breast cancer receiving systemic therapy at our institution between 1980 and 1998 were identified and their recorded height and weight were used to calculate BSA and body mass index (BMI). We reviewed the first cycle adjuvant chemotherapy dosing practices from 1990-1998. The ideal dose of chemotherapy was calculated based on calculated BSA, and then contrasted with the actual dose received at cycle one. Discrepancies were recorded and categorized, using the largest single drug reduction if more than one drug was reduced.

RESULTS

Mean BMI in the systemic therapy population was 26.4 +/- 5.3 kg/m2, 54% were overweight, 2% severely obese and 18% moderately so. Their mean BSA was 1.7 +/- 0.2 m2 and only 5% had a BSA > or = 2 m2. In the adjuvant chemotherapy subgroup, most patients received > or = 85% of their ideal dose. The mean dose reduction was 5.3 +/- 11.3% versus 9.9 +/- 11.3% in the BSA < 2 and > or = 2 m2 groups, respectively (p = 0.02), and 4.3 +/- 8.2% versus 6.7 +/- 13.1% in the BMI < 25 and > or = 25 kg/m2 groups, respectively (p = 0.008). While only 24% of chemotherapy dose reductions of > or = 15% were in the BSA > or = 2 m2 group, 76% were in the BMI > or = 25 kg/m2 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is prevalent in this breast cancer population. BSA is not a sensitive index of large body size. We consistently detected more frequent empiric dose reductions at cycle one of adjuvant chemotherapy, with reductions of greater magnitude in the largest women (BSA > or = 2 m2) and those who were overweight (BMI > or = 25 kg/m2).

Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy drug distribution varies greatly among individual patients. Therefore, we developed an individualised fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen to improve outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer. We then did a randomised trial to compare this individually tailored FEC regimen with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support.

METHODS

525 women younger than 60 years of age with high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised after surgery to receive nine cycles of tailored FEC to haematological equitoxicity with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (n=251), or three cycles of FEC at standard doses followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb), and peripheral-blood stem-cell or bone-marrow support (n=274). Both groups received locoregional radiation therapy and tamoxifen for 5 years. The primary outcome measure was relapse-free survival, and analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

At a median follow-up of 34.3 months, there were 81 breast-cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 113 in the CTCb group (double triangular method p=0.04). 60 deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 82 in the CTCb group (log-rank p=0.12). Patients in the CTCb group experienced more grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity compared with the tailored FEC group (p<0.0001). Two treatment-related deaths (0.7%) occurred in the CTCb group. Six patients in the tailored FEC group developed acute myeloid leukaemia and three developed myelodysplastic syndrome.

INTERPRETATION

Tailored FEC with G-CSF support resulted in a significantly improved relapse-free survival and fewer grade 3 and 4 toxicities compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy with CTCb as adjuvant therapy of women with high-risk primary breast cancer.