Primary and salvage therapy with LH-RH analogues in ovarian cancer

Follicle-stimulating hormone promotes nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in epithelial ovarian cells

Ovarian cancer is the first cause of death for gynecological malignances in developed countries and around 80% correspond to Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC). Overexpression of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) and its high affinity receptor TRKA are involved in EOC progression, modulating several oncogenic processes such as angiogenesis by the increase of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). FSH receptors (FSH-R) are present in EOC, but their changes and contribution during EOC progression are still not thoroughly known. The aims of this study were to evaluate the abundance of FSH receptors during EOC differentiation and to determine whether FSH modulates oncoproteins such as NGF and VEGF in ovarian cells. FSH-R expression in EOC tissues and cell lines (A2780, poorly differentiated EOC cells and HOSE, non-tumoral ovarian surface epithelial cells) were measured by RT-PCR and laser capture of epithelial cells from EOC samples by qPCR. FSH-R protein levels were evaluated by immunohisto/cytochemistry. Additionally, ovarian explants and ovarian cell lines were stimulated with FSH and/or FSH-R inhibitor to assess NGF and VEGF mRNA and protein levels. The results showed that FSH-R levels decreased during EOC progression, nevertheless these receptors are still present in poorly differentiated EOC. FSH increased NGF expression in ovarian cells, which was prevented using a FSH-R inhibitor. Similarly, in ovarian cancer explants, FSH increased NGF and VEGF mRNA, as well as NGF protein levels. These results suggest that FSH would display a key role not only in initial stages of EOC, but also in late stages of this disease, by modulation of NGF and VEGF levels in EOC cells.

Luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for the treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is seventh most common cancer in women worldwide. Approximately 1.3% of women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer at some point during their life time. The majority of tumours arise from surface of the ovary (epithelial). Two thirds of these women will present with advanced disease, requiring aggressive treatment, which includes debulking surgery (removal of as much disease as possible) and chemotherapy. However, most women (75%) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) will relapse following surgery and chemotherapy. Patients who relapse are treated with either platinum or non-platinum drugs and this is dependent on the platinum-sensitivity and platinum-free interval. These drug regimens are generally well-tolerated although there are potential severe side effects. New treatments that can be used to treat recurrence or prevent disease progression after first-line or subsequent chemotherapy are important, especially those with a low toxicity profile. Hormones such as luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have been used in the treatment of relapsed EOC. Some studies have shown objective remissions, while other studies have shown little or no benefit. Most small studies report a better side-effect profile for LHRH agonists when compared to standard chemotherapeutic agents used in EOC.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists with chemotherapeutic agents or placebo in relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group trials register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase up to January 2016. We also searched registers of clinical trials and abstracts of scientific meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared LHRH agonists with chemotherapeutic agents or placebo in relapsed EOC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed whether relevant studies met the inclusion criteria, retrieved data and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies, including 97 women, met our inclusion criteria: one assessed LHRH agonist (leuprorelin) use in relapsed (platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory) EOC in comparison with a chemotherapeutic agent (treosulfan) (Du Bois 2002); the other examined LHRH agonist (decapeptyl) versus a placebo (Currie 1994). Since both studies had different control groups, a meta-analysis was not possible.There may be little or no difference between treatment with leuprorelin or treosulfan in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.67; very low-quality evidence) or progression-free survival (PFS) at six and 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.68, and RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.66; very low-quality evidence), respectively (Du Bois 2002). The duration of follow-up was 2.5 years and quality of life (QoL) was not reported in this study.Alopecia and fatigue were probably more common with treosulfan than leuprorelin (alopecia RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.91 (very low-quality evidence)). There may be little or no difference in other Grade 3/4 side effects: nausea and vomiting (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.66 (very low-quality evidence)); neurotoxicity (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.71 (very low-quality evidence)) and neutropenia (RR 0.97, 95% 0.06 to 14.97 (very low-quality evidence)),The Currie 1994 study, which compared decapeptyl treatment with placebo, reported mean PFS of 16 weeks verus 11.2 weeks, respectively. No relative effects measures or P value at a particular time point were reported. Overall survival (OS) and QoL outcomes were not reported. In addition, adverse events were only mentioned for the decapeptyl group.Adverse events were incompletely reported (no adverse events in decapeptyl group, but not reported for the placebo group).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of two small RCTs, there is not enough evidence to comment on the safety and effectiveness of LHRH agonists in the treatment of platinum-refractory and platinum-resistant (relapsed) EOC. Overall, the quality of evidence for all outcomes (including OS, PFS, QoL and adverse events) is very low.

Drug Insight: clinical use of agonists and antagonists of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone

This article reviews the clinical uses of agonists and antagonists of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), also known as gonadotropin-releasing hormone. In particular, the state of the art treatment of breast, ovarian and prostate cancer, reproductive disorders, uterine leiomyoma, endometriosis and benign prostatic hypertrophy is reported. Clinical applications of LHRH agonists are based on gradual downregulation of pituitary receptors for LHRH, which leads to inhibition of the secretion of gonadotropins and sex steroids. LHRH antagonists immediately block pituitary LHRH receptors and, therefore, achieve rapid therapeutic effects. LHRH agonists and antagonists can be used to treat uterine leiomyoma and endometriosis; furthermore, both types of LHRH analogs are used to block the secretion of endogenous gonadotropins in ovarian-stimulation programs for assisted reproduction. The preferred primary treatment of patients with advanced, androgen-dependent prostate cancer is based on the periodic administration of depot preparations of LHRH agonists; these agonists can be likewise used to treat estrogen-sensitive breast cancer in premenopausal women. LHRH antagonists have been successfully used to treat prostate cancer and benign prostatic hypertrophy. Since receptors for LHRH are present on a variety of human tumors, (notably breast, prostate, ovarian, endometrial and renal cancers), cytotoxic therapy that targets these tumors with hybrid molecules of LHRH might be possible in the near future. Analogs of LHRH are now a well-established means of treating sex-steroid-dependent, benign and malignant disorders.

Phase II trial of tamoxifen and goserelin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Endocrine therapy is a recognised option in the treatment of chemo-resistant ovarian cancer. We conducted a nonrandomised phase II evaluation of combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer that had recurred following chemotherapy. In total, 26 patients entered the study, of which 17 had platinum-resistant disease. The median age was 63 years and enrolled patients had received a median of three chemotherapy regimens prior to trial entry. Patients were given oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily on a continuous basis and subcutaneous goserelin 3.6 mg once a month until disease progression. Using the definition of endocrine response that included patients with stable disease (SD) of 6 months or greater, the overall response rate (clinical benefit rate) was 50%. This included one complete response (CR) (3.8%), two partial responses (PR) (7.7%) and 10 patients with SD (38.5%). The median progression-free interval (PFI) was 4 months (95% CI 2.4–9.6) while the median overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 5.5–30.6). Four patients received treatment for more than 2 years (range 1–31) and one of them is still on treatment. In none of the four patients was there any evidence of recurrent or cumulative treatment related toxicity. Treatment-limiting toxicity was not seen in any of the study population. Endocrine data demonstrated a marked suppression of luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to less than 4% of baseline values. No consistent correlation could be established between LH/FSH suppression and tumour response. Likewise no relationship was observed between Inhibin A/B and pro-alpha C levels and tumour response. Inhibin is unlikely to be a useful surrogate marker for response in locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer. Combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin is an active regimen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Hormonal therapy is advantageous in its relative lack of toxicity, ease of administration and tolerability, thus making it suitable for patients with heavily pretreated disease, compromised bone marrow function and other comorbid conditions that contraindicate cytotoxic therapy as well as in patients with indolent disease.

GnRH in non-hypothalamic reproductive tissues

Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is a hypothalamic neuronal secretory decapeptide that plays a pivotal role in mammalian reproduction. GnRH and its analogues are used extensively in the treatment of hormone dependent diseases and assisted reproductive technology. Fourteen structural variants and three different forms of GnRH, named as hypothalamic GnRH or GnRH-I, mid brain GnRH or GnRH-II and GnRH-III across various species of protochordates and vertebrates have been recognised. The hormone acts by binding to cell surface transmembrane G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and activates Gq/11 subfamily of G proteins. Although hypothalamus and pituitary are the principal source and target sites for GnRH, several reports have recently suggested extra-hypothalamic GnRH and GnRH receptors in various reproductive tissues such as ovaries, placenta, endometrium, oviducts, testes, prostrate, and mammary glands. GnRH-II appears to be predominantly expressed in extra pituitary reproductive tissues where it produces its effect by PLC, PKA2, PLD, and AC cell signalling pathways. In these tissues, GnRH is considered to act by autocrine or paracrine manner and regulate ovarian steroidogenesis by having stimulatory as well as inhibitory effect on the production of steroid hormones and apoptosis in ovarian follicle and corpus luteum. In male gonads, GnRH has been shown to cause a direct stimulatory effect on basal steroidogenesis and an inhibitory effect on gonadotropin-stimulated androgen biosynthesis. Recent studies have shown that GnRH is more abundantly present in ovarian, endometrial and prostrate carcinomas. The presence of type-II GnRH receptors in reproductive tissues (e.g. gonads, prostrate, endometrium, oviduct, placenta, and mammary glands) suggests existence of distinct role(s) for type-II GnRH molecule in these tissues. The existence of different GnRH forms indicates the presence of distinctive cognate receptors types in vertebrates and is a productive area of research and may contribute to the development of new generation of GnRH analogues with highly selective and controlled action on different reproductive tissues and the target-specific GnRH analogues could be developed.

New developments in the use of peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus agonists

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the pituitary secretion of both luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and thus controls the hormonal and reproductive functions of the gonads. The blockade of the effects of GnRH may be sought for a variety of reasons; for example, to control premature LH surges and to reduce the cancellation rate with the aim of improving the pregnancy rate per treatment cycle or in the treatment of sex hormone-dependent disorders. Selective blockade of LH/FSH secretion and subsequent chemical castration have previously been achieved by desensitising the pituitary to continuously administered GnRH or by giving long-acting GnRH agonists. GnRH analogues are indicated for clinical situations in which the suppression of endogenous gonadotropins (precocious puberty, contraception and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation) or sexual steroids (endometriosis, prostate hyperplasia, cancer and uterine fibroids) is desired. The immediate suppression of the pituitary that is achieved by GnRH antagonists without an initial stimulatory effect is the main advantage of these compounds over the agonists. GnRH antagonists have been developed for clinical use with acceptable pharmacokinetic, safety and commercial profiles. In assisted reproduction, these compounds seem to be as effective as established therapy, but with shorter treatment times, less use of gonadotropic hormones, improved patient acceptance, and fewer follicles and oocytes. All of the current indications for GnRH agonist desensitisation may prove to be indications for a GnRH antagonist, including endometriosis, leiomyoma and breast cancer in women, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatic carcinoma in men, and central precocious puberty in children. However, the best clinical evidence has been in assisted reproduction and prostate cancer.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist inhibits estrone sulfatase expression of cystic endometriosis in the ovary

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the inhibitory effect of GnRH agonist on estrone (E(1)) sulfatase expression.

DESIGN

Retrospective immunohistochemical study.

SETTING

The Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-three women who had undergone cystectomy of the ovary or oophorectomy and were proved histopathologically to have cystic endometriosis in the ovary.

INTERVENTION(S)

Fifteen of the 33 patients were treated with GnRH agonists monthly for 2-6 months before surgery. The other 18 patients did not receive any hormonal therapy. Tissue sections were immunostained with an anti-E(1) sulfatase monoclonal antibody (KM1049) originating from human placenta.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Microscopic evaluation to assess the presence and localization of E(1) sulfatase and to describe any variations in its expression with or without treatment with GnRH agonist.

RESULT(S)

Immunostaining showed that E(1) sulfatase was localized only on the glandular epithelial cells of cystic endometriosis in the ovary. The immunostaining with anti-E(1) sulfatase proved that GnRH agonist inhibited E(1) sulfatase expression in the cystic endometriosis in the ovary.

CONCLUSION(S)

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist inhibits E(1) sulfatase expression in cystic endometriosis in the ovary.

GnRH analogues as an adjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Lowering gonadotropin levels with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in patients with ovarian cancer remains open to debate. The aim of this study was to assess the results of treatment in stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer patients who had surgery supplemented with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and GnRH analogues. Gonadotropin levels were monitored during treatment.

METHODS

The study group comprised 69 patients aged 27-70 years, stratified according to the type of treatment. The overall disease-free, 5-year survival rates and the frequency of remissions were analyzed. Hormonal tests [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)] were performed in 58 patients. Associations were checked between gonadotropin levels, clinical findings, and survival. The results were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were noted when chemotherapy was supplemented with GnRH analogues and/or radiotherapy. Administration of GnRH analogues resulted in significantly lower levels of LH than of FSH. Levels of FSH were significantly lower in patients surviving at least 5 years or in complete remission at the time of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy can produce favorable results in late-stage ovarian cancer, and GnRH analogues have an important role in treatment strategy.

No rules without exception: long-term complete remission observed in a study using a LH-RH agonist in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Second-line chemotherapy in platinum/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer induces an objective response in <15% and third-line chemotherapy results in responses less than 10%. Chemotherapy always results in side effects with the risk of a low quality of life. Endocrine therapy is used world-wide among chemo-resistant ovarian cancer. Tamoxifen is a standard palliative treatment in many centers. LH-RH (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone) agonists have also demonstrated activity among patients with ovarian cancer in several studies with response rates of 9-12% and disease stabilization in 15-26% of these women.

METHODS

In this retrospective study 32 patients with ovarian cancer who had relapsed after platinum/paclitaxel-based first-line chemotherapy and had exhausted all standard treatments received LH-RH analogue Leuprorelin depot 3.75 mg sc once a month until tumor progression.

RESULTS

One patient (3%) had a complete response, with remission time over 3 years. Two patients (6%) reached partial response with remission time of 3 and 4 months. Four patients (12%) remained stable for a mean time of 7 months (range 4-12 months). The remaining 25 patients (78%) had progressive disease. The treatment was well tolerated, and no major toxicity has been reported.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that LH-RH agonist Leuprorelin has only a limited effect in patients pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Structural characterization of GnRH loci in the medaka genome

To help clarify the origin of a third gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) paralog found only in the teleost lineage, we have characterized GnRH loci in a teleost species, the medaka Oryzias latipes, and compared corresponding regions of the medaka and human genomes. Three GnRHs for medaka-type GnRH (mdGnRH), chicken-II-type GnRH (cGnRH-II), and salmon-type GnRH (sGnRH) exist as single-copy genes and reside on separate chromosomes in the medaka genome. Both medaka mdGnRH and human mGnRH are closely linked to FLJ20038 encoding a hypothetical protein, and both cGnRH-IIs in the medaka and humans are adjacent to PTP(alpha) for protein tyrosine phosphatase alpha. These conserved syntenies demonstrate that mdGnRH and cGnRH-II in teleosts are orthologous to mGnRH and cGnRH-II in tetrapods, respectively. On the other hand, the third paralogous GnRH in the medaka, sGnRH, is adjacent to PTP(epsilon), a paralog of PTP(alpha). Although humans possess PTP(epsilon) on 10q26, no sGnRH-like sequence was found in the human genome databases. Therefore a gene duplication that gave rise to the third paralogous GnRH likely occurred before the divergence of teleosts and tetrapods, and it has been lost only in the tetrapod lineage. Additionally, together with the prior observations that like GnRH, PTP(alpha)/PTP(epsilon) are strongly expressed in neural and tumor cells and that GnRH can increase PTP activity, the current data suggests that the physically linked cGnRH-II/sGnRH and PTP(alpha)/PTP(epsilon) are also functionally linked.

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonists

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are now widely used in protocols of patients with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation to treat infertility. By competitively binding to the pituitary GnRH receptor, they lead to a rapid suppression of gonadotropins and consecutively sex hormones. In the past, GnRH agonists have been exclusively used for these patients, with the disadvantage of an initial rise of gonadotropins--the flare-up effect. Several trials comparing the agonistic and antagonistic analogs of GnRH found no significant differences in oocyte quality, fertilization and pregnancy rates. Slightly lower implantation and pregnancy rates, and estradiol levels, in patients treated with GnRH antagonists has raised concern about eventual extrapituitary adverse effects. However, no convincing evidence has yet been found for any detrimental ovarian effects of GnRH antagonists. The lower rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, a potentially severe disadvantage of infertility treatment, is a positive feature of GnRH antagonists. The key point is that GnRH antagonists have been proven to be as effective and safe as GnRH agonists. This broadens the spectrum of indications for GnRH antagonists to sex hormone-dependent disorders like endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and gynecological cancers such as breast and ovarian cancer.

Gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-receptor antagonists

Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates the pituitary secretion of both luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and thus controls the hormonal and reproductive function of the gonads. Blockade of GnRH effects may be wanted for a variety of reasons-eg, to prevent untimely luteinisation during assisted reproduction or in the treatment of sex-hormone-dependent disorders. Selective blockade of LH/FSH secretion and subsequent chemical castration have previously been achieved by desensitising the pituitary to continuously administered GnRH or by giving long-acting GnRH agonists. Only recently have GnRH-receptor antagonists, that immediately block GnRH's effects, been developed for clinical use with acceptable pharmacokinetic, safety, and commercial profiles. In assisted reproduction, these compounds seem to be as effective as established therapy but with shorter treatment times, less use of gonadotropic hormones, improved patient acceptance, and fewer follicles and oocytes. All current indications for GnRH-agonist desensitisation may prove to be indications for a GnRH antagonist, including endometriosis, leiomyoma, and breast cancer in women, benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostatic carcinoma in men, and central precocious puberty in children. However, the best clinical evidence so far has been in assisted reproduction and prostate cancer.

Inhibition of in situ expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma of the uterus by leuprorelin acetate

We have shown that in situ estrogen synthesized in leiomyoma of the uterus plays a possible role in the promotion of leiomyoma cell growth via an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. In the present study, we demonstrated that leuprorelin acetate, a GnRH agonist widely used for treatment of uterine leiomyoma by down-regulation of pituitary-ovarian function, suppressed the expression of aromatase P450 (an estrogen synthetase) in leiomyoma cells. Given the role of in situ estrogen in leiomyoma cell growth, the inhibition of in situ estrogen synthesis may play a role in GnRH agonist-induced rapid regression of leiomyomas. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that in women receiving no medication uterine leiomyomas express aromatase P450 mRNA at levels 20 times higher than that in the surrounding myometrium. Leuprorelin acetate treatment (1.88 mg every 4 wk, sc injection) for 12-24 wk reduced the expression of aromatase P450 mRNA in leiomyoma tissue as well as in the myometrium, to approximately one tenth of that in the myometrium of untreated women. Suppression of aromatase P450 expression was also demonstrated by Western blot analysis and aromatase activity assay of microsomal fractions prepared from leiomyomas. On the other hand, no differences in the levels of activity and mRNA of aromatase P450 were observed between leiomyoma cells obtained from women treated with and without leuprorelin acetate injections when cells were cultured ex vivo and stimulated by various combinations of stimulants such as dexamethasone + IL-1beta. The addition of various concentrations of E2 did not affect the aromatase activity of leiomyoma cells, suggesting that deprivation of circulating (ovarian) estrogen is not a cause of decreased expression of aromatase during leuprorelin acetate therapy. On the other hand, 8-d treatment with leuprorelin acetate (100 nmol/liter) reduced dexamethasone + IL-1beta-induced activity and a mRNA level of aromatase by 28% and 42%, respectively. These results indicated that leuprorelin acetate inhibits the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells, which contributes to the rapid regression of leiomyoma during leuprorelin acetate therapy.

Fertility options for female cancer patients: facts and fiction

OBJECTIVE

To review the latest progress in the prevention of ovarian failure induced by chemo/radiotherapy, as well as the latest advances in culture technology and transplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue.

DESIGN

The English-language literature was searched with PubMed and related references.

CONCLUSION(S)

The development of combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy has improved the long-term survival of young cancer patients who are then frequently faced with iatrogenic ovarian failure and its consequences. The use of prior and concomitant GnRH analogs with chemotherapy offers encouraging results in animal studies with regard to prevention of ovarian failure. Adequately controlled research projects are needed to define the utility of GnRHa cotreatment in women cancer patients exposed to prolonged chemotherapy. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is the optimal procedure for follicle banking. Theoretic options include returning the banked tissue back to the original pedicle so that pregnancy could be achieved naturally. Alternatively, the tissue can be grafted to a heterotopic site, either as an autograft (i.e., rectus abdominis muscle sheath) or as a xenograft (i.e., immunodeficient mice). Follicles could also be grown in vitro. Until reliable ovarian culture technology becomes available, autologous transplantation offers the best prospect of using frozen-thawed ovarian tissue. A primary concern, however, is the issue of microscopic metastatic disease to the ovary and the possibility of tumor reimplantation. Areas of research should focus on optimizing the freeze/thaw procedure for ovarian tissue, minimizing the ischemia-reperfusion injury after transplantation, and detecting minimal residual disease in ovarian tissue grafts.

D-TRP-6-LHRH (Triptorelin) is not effective in ovarian carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Co-operative Group Study

Between March and September 1988, 74 patients with progressive ovarian cancer after prior platinum-based therapy were treated with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist Triptorelin (Decapeptyl degrees). Treatment consisted of i.m. injection of 3.75 mg of microencapsulated Triptorelin on days 1, 8 and 28 followed by 4-weekly injections until tumor progression. No objective responses were observed. Eleven out of 68 evaluable patients (16%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5 months in patients with disease stabilization and 2 months for all evaluable patients. The median survival for patients with disease stabilization was 17 months, whereas for all patients it was 4 months. The treatment was well tolerated; the only reported adverse events were incidental hot flushes. This study showed that the LHRH agonist Triptorelin has only modest efficacy in patients pretreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy.