Incidence of gastroesophageal reflux following repair of esophageal atresia

Quality of reporting of the literature on gastrointestinal reflux after repair of esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula

OBJECTIVES

There is variation in the management of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). Well-reported literature is important for clinical decision-making. We assessed the quality of reporting (QOR) of postoperative GER management in EA-TEF.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, CENTRAL databases and gray literature was conducted. Included articles reported a primary diagnosis of EA-TEF, a secondary diagnosis of postoperative GER, and primary treatment of GER with antireflux medications. The QOR was assessed using the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

RESULTS

Retrieval of 2910 articles resulted in 48 relevant articles (N=2592 patients) with an overall quality percentage score of 48%-95% (median=65%). The best reported items were "participants" and "outcome data" (93.8% each), "generalisability" (91.7%) and "background/rationale" (89.6%). Less than 20% of studies provided detailed "main results"; less than 5% of studies reported adequately on "bias" or "funding." Sample size calculation and study limitations were included in 17 (35.4%) and 16 (33.3%) studies respectively. Follow-up time was inconsistently reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall QOR is moderate using STROBE, important areas are underreported. Inadequate methodological reporting may lead to inappropriate clinical decisions. Awareness of STROBE, emphasizing proper reporting is needed.

The management of postoperative reflux in congenital esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Esophageal atresia (EA), with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding routine anti-reflux medication post EA-TEF repair and its impact on postoperative GER and associated complications.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, CENTRAL (Cochrane library) electronic databases and gray literature. Full-text screening was performed in duplicate. Included articles reported a primary diagnosis of EA-TEF, a secondary diagnosis of postoperative GER, and primary treatment of GER with anti-reflux medications.

RESULTS

Screening of 2,910 articles resulted in 25 articles (1,663 patients) for analysis. Most were single-center studies (92%) and retrospective (76%); there were no randomized control trials. Fifteen studies named the class of anti-reflux agent used, 3 the duration of therapy, and none either the dose prescribed or number of doses. Complications were inconsistently reported. Anti-reflux surgery was performed in 433/1,663 (26.0%) patients. Average follow-up was 53.2 months (14 studies).

CONCLUSION

The quality of literature regarding anti-reflux medication for GER post EA-TEF repair is poor. There are no well-outlined algorithms for anti-reflux agents, doses, or duration of therapy. Standardized protocols and reliable reporting are necessary to develop guidelines to better manage postoperative GER in EA-TEF patients.

Does postoperative pH monitoring predict complicated gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophageal atresia?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common after repair of esophageal atresia with a distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EATOF). In a retrospective study we assessed whether early 18-h pH monitoring can predict the development of EATOF-associated gastroesophageal reflux. During 1980-1997, 90 consecutive patients had primary repair for EATOF. Development of GER was classified as favorable if the patient developed no esophagitis or mild esophagitis and needed no antireflux medication, and as unfavorable if the patient developed moderate or secondary esophagitis or required an antireflux procedure. Patients who developed unfavorable GER outcome before pH monitoring or needed secondary reconstruction or those whose endoscopic follow-up data were insufficient were excluded. Eighteen-hour pH monitoring was considered pathologic if esophageal pH was <4 more than 10% of the recorded time or 5% of the recorded time minus 2 h after each meal, or if there were more than three preprandial reflux periods lasting longer than 5 min. A total of fifty patients were included into the study. pH monitoring was performed at the median age of 9.2 (range 2.5-95.0) months and classified as pathologic in 10 and normal in 40 patients. After a median follow-up of 59 (0.3-217.6) months, nine of 10 (90%) patients with pathologic pH monitoring and five of 40 (12.5%) patients with normal pH monitoring developed unfavorable outcomes ( p<.05). We conclude that early pH monitoring predicts the development of significant GER, but because 12.5% of patients with normal early pH monitoring also developed significant GER, early pH monitoring alone does not rule out the development of significant GER.

Long-term analysis of children with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

For children with esophageal atresia (EA) or tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), the first years of life can be associated with many problems. Little is known about the long-term function of children who underwent repair as neonates. This study evaluates outcome and late sequelae of children with EA/TEF.

METHODS

Medical records of infants with esophageal anomalies (May 1972 through December 1990) were reviewed. Study parameters included demographics, dysphagia, frequent respiratory infections (> 3/yr), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), frequent choking, leak, stricture, and developmental delays (weight, height < 25%, < 5%, respectively).

RESULTS

Over 224 months, 69 infants (37 boys, 32 girls) were identified: type A, 10 infants; type B, 1; type C, 53; type D, 4; type E, 1. Mean follow-up was 125 months. During the first 5 years of follow-up, dysphagia (45%), respiratory infections (29%), and GERD (48%) were common as were growth delays. These problems improved as the children matured.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with esophageal anomalies face many difficulties during initial repair and frequently encounter problems years later. Support groups can foster child development and alleviate parent isolationism. Despite growth retardation, esophageal motility disorders, and frequent respiratory infections, children with EA/TEF continue to have a favorable long-term outcome.

Relationship of esophageal anastomotic tension to the development of gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common occurrence after repair of congenital esophageal atresia and is believed to be more frequent when the esophageal anastomosis is performed under tension. This study documents that esophageal anastomotic tension correlates directly with the severity of acid reflux into the esophagus in the rabbit model.

METHODS

Eight adult rabbits underwent complete esophageal transection with immediate reanastomosis (EA) and 12 underwent resection of a 1-cm segment of the midesophagus with reanastomosis under mild tension (EAT). Three-weeks postoperation continuous lower esophageal pH (LEpH) values were recorded for a 24-hour period for each rabbit, and compared with five normal unoperated rabbits.

RESULTS

The normal rabbit's average LEpH is 7.7. EA rabbits had LEpH values below 5.0 for a mean of 56 min/24 hr (3.8% of monitored time). EAT rabbits had LEpH values below 5.0 for a mean of 328 min/24 hr (25.5% of monitored time; P < .05). EA rabbits had a mean of 8.8 reflux episodes under 5.0/24 hr, whereas EAT rabbits had a mean of 29.6 reflux episodes under 5.0. All EAT rabbits had moderate to severe anastomotic strictures; no EA rabbits had strictures. There were no anastomotic leaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal anastomosis with mild tension in the rabbit causes severe GER with resultant anastomotic strictures in almost all rabbits, in contrast to rabbits undergoing esophageal anastomosis without tension in whom strictures did not develop and had only small reduction in esophageal pH values.

Ambulatory 24-hour manometric and pH metric evidence of permanent impairment of clearance capacity in patients with esophageal atresia

Dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) probably caused by structural disorganization of the esophagus occur frequently after repair of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), and the extent to which they may improve beyond childhood is not known. The aim of the present study is to assess by combined ambulatory 24-hour manometry and pH-metry the esophageal peristaltic activity and acid clearing capacity in adolescents and adults who had been operated on for TEF at birth. Twenty-two patients, aged 17.1 +/- 4.5 years (mean +/- SD), were examined with combined three-channel manometry and two-channel pH-metry followed by endoscopy and biopsy. Although they considered themselves healthy, on careful interrogation, 16 (72%) were found to have dysphagia, 13 (59%) had heartburn, 10 (45%) had foreign body impaction, and 7 (31%) had chronic respiratory tract disease. GER was detected in 12 (54%) patients (5 with histological esophagitis), 10 of whom had a pattern of prolonged nocturnal episodes with very slow clearance. All patients had diminished contractile activity with low-amplitude and short-duration waves that decreased from 0.53 +/- 0.35 waves per minute to 0.28 +/- 0.2 waves per minute during sleep. Propulsive activity was uniformly disorganized, with peristaltic sequences being few (less than 50% overall) and incomplete (above 80%). Finally, the acid-clearing capacity was nil; the proportions of ineffective sequences were above 90% for all periods considered, including sleep and mealtimes. The motor behavior of nonrefluxing and refluxing patients was identical despite the differences in esophageal acid exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effect of tube gastrostomy on gastroesophageal reflux in patients with esophageal atresia

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) occurs frequently in infants with esophageal atresia (EA). The definitive management is primary repair and often includes tube gastrostomy. The recent finding of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure changes with tube gastrostomy suggests that GER might be related to gastrostomy rather than EA per se. To evaluate this thesis, two populations of patients from different children's hospitals were reviewed: EA with and without routine gastrostomy. The two populations were similar with respect to number of infants, associated anomalies, distribution in the Waterston classification, morbidity, and mortality. One hundred sixteen patients were studied. Of the 66 survivors who underwent gastrostomy and repair of EA, 30 were found to have GER (45.5%) and 12 required fundoplication (18.2%). Of 31 surviving patients who underwent repair of EA without gastrostomy, 11 had GER (35.5%) and four required fundoplication (12.9%). These data suggest that tube gastrostomy does not significantly contribute to the GER associated with EA.