Gastric tube esophagoplasty

Surgical techniques for esophageal replacement in children

PURPOSE

Surgical techniques for esophageal replacement (ER) in children include colon interposition, gastric tube, gastric transposition, and jejunal interposition. This review evaluates the merits and demerits of each.

METHOD

Surgical techniques, complications, and outcome of ER are reviewed over last seven decades.

RESULTS

Colon interposition is the time-tested procedure with minimal and less serious complications. Long-term complications include reflux, halitosis, colonic segment dilatation, and anastomotic stricture, sometimes requiring surgical interventions especially for dilatation and reflux. Gastric tube is technically more risky, and associated with early serious complications like prolonged leak in neck or mediastinum, graft necrosis, and ischemia leading to stricture of the tube. Long-term results are good. Gastric transposition is much simpler, can be performed in emergency and in newborns. It involves a single anastomosis in the neck. Post-operative complications include gastric stasis, bile reflux, restricted growth, and decreased pulmonary functional capacity. Jejunal interposition has not been used extensively due to short mesentery but long-term results are good in expert hands.

CONCLUSION

Colon is the most preferred and safest organ for ER. Stomach is a vascular and muscular organ with lower risk of ischemia. Gastric tube is a demanding technique. Jejunum or ileum is alternative for redo cases.

Total gastric transposition: an alternative to esophageal replacement in children

Total gastric transposition was performed in 21 children as an alternative procedure for esophageal replacement. The age at the operation ranged from 15 months to 11 years. Half of the children were less than 2 years old. Fifteen patients had esophageal atresia. The stomach was passed toward the neck either through the esophageal bed (6 cases, with concomitant blunt esophagectomy without thoracotomy) or the retrosternal route (15 cases). There was one death in the early postoperative period secondary to an anastomotic leak and acute mediastinitis in a case of pharyngogastric anastomosis. Three other patients developed cervical leak with spontaneous closure but this ultimately led to a late anastomotic stricture (more than 6 months) requiring endoscopic dilatation. Only one child needed more than three attempts of endoscopic dilatation. None of these patients required surgical revision. The mean follow-up was 60 months (range, 10 to 122 months). Despite bulky atonic intrathoracic stomach occurring in some children, only two patients developed regurgitation and symptoms of poor gastric emptying. There were neither early nor late respiratory problems. Excellent and good functional outcome were achieved in 85% and 15% of the patients, respectively. Two patients have not undergone a weight catch-up phase. The majority of the children have been between the 20th and 80th percentile for weight. Five children remain below the 20th and two below the 5th percentile. The remarkably low morbidity and mortality combined with satisfactory functional results indicate that the total gastric transposition is a safe and easy alternative surgical procedure for esophageal replacement in children.