Perturbations of Cellular Circadian Rhythms by Light and Temperature. Temporal Disorder in Human Oscillatory Systems. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1987. pp. 233-45. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72637-8_28]

The effects of temperature change on the circadian clock of Neurospora

The phase resetting of the circadian oscillatory system by pulses of increased temperature (zeitgebers) and the temperature compensation of its period length during longer exposures are major features of the system, but are not well understood in molecular terms. In Neurospora crassa, the effects of pulses of increased temperature on the circadian rhythm of conidiation were determined and possible inputs to the oscillatory system tested, including changes in cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and H+ concentrations, as well as changes of phosphorylation, synthesis and degradation of proteins. Following the kinetics of these parameters during exposure to increased temperature showed transient changes. Experimental manipulation of cAMP, Ca2+ and H+ levels, and of the synthesis and, possibly, degradation of proteins, resulted in phase shifts of the oscillatory system. It is assumed that the temperature signal affects the oscillator(s) by multiple pathways and shifts the whole state of the oscillatory system. Second messenger levels, protein synthesis and protein degradation show adaptation to longer exposures to elevated temperature which may be involved in the temperature compensation of the period length. The temperature compensation is also proposed to involve a shift in the state of all or most oscillator variables.

Temperature effect on entrainment, phase shifting, and amplitude of circadian clocks and its molecular bases

Effects of temperature and temperature changes on circadian clocks in cyanobacteria, unicellular algae, and plants, as well as fungi, arthropods, and vertebrates are reviewed. Periodic temperature with periods around 24 h even in the low range of 1-2 degrees C (strong Zeitgeber effect) can entrain all ectothermic (poikilothermic) organisms. This is also reflected by the phase shifts-recorded by phase response curves (PRCs)-that are elicited by step- or pulsewise changes in the temperature. The amount of phase shift (weak or strong type of PRC) depends on the amplitude of the temperature change and on its duration when applied as a pulse. Form and position of the PRC to temperature pulses are similar to those of the PRC to light pulses. A combined high/low temperature and light/dark cycle leads to a stabile phase and maximal amplitude of the circadian rhythm-when applied in phase (i.e., warm/light and cold/dark). When the two Zeitgeber cycles are phase-shifted against each other the phase of the circadian rhythm is determined by either Zeitgeber or by both, depending on the relative strength (amplitude) of both Zeitgeber signals and the sensitivity of the species/individual toward them. A phase jump of the circadian rhythm has been observed in several organisms at a certain phase relationship of the two Zeitgeber cycles. Ectothermic organisms show inter- and intraspecies plus seasonal variations in the temperature limits for the expression of the clock, either of the basic molecular mechanism, and/or the dependent variables. A step-down from higher temperatures or a step-up from lower temperatures to moderate temperatures often results in initiation of oscillations from phase positions that are about 180 degrees different. This may be explained by holding the clock at different phase positions (maximum or minimum of a clock component) or by significantly different levels of clock components at the higher or lower temperatures. Different permissive temperatures result in different circadian amplitudes, that usually show a species-specific optimum. In endothermic (homeothermic) organisms periodic temperature changes of about 24 h often cause entrainment, although with considerable individual differences, only if they are of rather high amplitudes (weak Zeitgeber effects). The same applies to the phase-shifting effects of temperature pulses. Isolated bird pineals and rat suprachiasmatic nuclei tissues on the other hand, respond to medium high temperature pulses and reveal PRCs similar to that of light signals. Therefore, one may speculate that the self-selected circadian rhythm of body temperature in reptiles or the endogenously controlled body temperature in homeotherms (some of which show temperature differences of more than 2 degrees C) may, in itself, serve as an internal entraining system. The so-called heterothermic mammals (undergoing low body temperature states in a daily or seasonal pattern) may be more sensitive to temperature changes. Effects of temperature elevation on the molecular clock mechanisms have been shown in Neurospora (induction of the frequency (FRQ) protein) and in Drosophila (degradation of the period (PER) and timeless (TIM) protein) and can explain observed phase shifts of rhythms in conidiation and locomotor activity, respectively. Temperature changes probably act directly on all processes of the clock mechanism some being more sensitive than the others. Temperature changes affect membrane properties, ion homeostasis, calcium influx, and other signal cascades (cAMP, cGMP, and the protein kinases A and C) (indirect effects) and may thus influence, in particular, protein phosphorylation processes of the clock mechanism. The temperature effects resemble to some degree those induced by light or by light-transducing neurons and their transmitters. In ectothermic vertebrates temperature changes significantly affect the melatonin rhythm, which in turn exerts entraining (phase shifting) functions.

The cellular mechanism of circadian rhythms--a view on evidence, hypotheses and problems

A stable period length is a characteristic property of circadian oscillations. The question about whether higher frequency oscillators (0.5-8 hr) contribute to or establish the stable circadian periodicity cannot be answered at present. A sequential coupling of quantal subcycles appears possible on the basis of known "ultradian" oscillations. There is, however, no supporting evidence for such a concept. Phase response curves of the circadian clock derived from various perturbing pulses allow qualitative conclusions concerning the perturbed clock process. Deductions from computer simulations also allow conclusions about the phase of this oscillatory process. The distinction between processes (a) essential to the clock mechanism, (b) maintaining and controlling the clock (inputs) and (c) depending on the clock (outputs) on the basis of "oscillatory" and "change of psi or tau after perturbation" seems to be useful but not stringent. Protein synthesis may be an essential or input process. Oscillatory changes of this process may be due to periodic translational control or RNA-supply. Circadian changes in protein concentration and/or activity may depend on periodic synthesis, proteolysis, covalent modifications or aggregations. Specific essential proteins have not been identified conclusively. The large overlap between the group of agents and treatments that phase shift the clock and the group that induces stress proteins suggest that the latter may play a role in the controlling (input) or essential domain. The role of membranes in the clock mechanism is not clear: concepts assuming an essential function are based on circumstantial evidence. The membrane potential as well as Ca2+ may be involved in either input or essential function. Ca(2+)-calmodulin may also be important as concluded from inhibitor experiments. It is tempting to assume that a calmodulin-dependent kinase is part of a periodic protein phosphorylation process, yet it is not clear whether the periodic protein phosphorylation that has been observed is essential or is just another output process.