Chemotherapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

A randomized multicenter trial comparing resection and radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Though the outcome of resection for locally invasive pancreatic cancer is still poor, it has gradually improved in Japan, and the 5-year survival is now about 10%. However, the advantage of resection over radiochemotherapy has not yet been confirmed by a randomized trial. We conducted this study to compare surgical resection alone versus radiochemotherapy without resection for locally invasive pancreatic cancer using a multicenter randomized design.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic cancer who met our preoperative criteria for inclusion (pancreatic cancer invading the pancreatic capsule without involvement of the superior mesenteric artery or the common hepatic artery, or without distant metastasis) underwent laparotomy. Patients with operative findings consistent with our criteria were randomized into a radical resection group and a radiochemotherapy group (200 mg/m(2)/day of intravenous 5-fluorouracil and 5040 cGy of radiotherapy) without resection. The 2 groups were compared for mean survival, hazard ratio, 1-year survival, quality of life scores, and hematologic and blood chemical data.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were assigned to the resection group and 22 to the radiochemotherapy group. There was 1 operative death. The surgical resection group had better results than the radiochemotherapy group as measured by 1-year survival (62% vs 32 %, P=.05), mean survival time (>17 vs 11 months, P < .03), and hazard ratio (0.46, P=.04). There were no differences in the quality of life score or laboratory data apart from increased diarrhea after surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Locally invasive pancreatic cancer without distant metastases and major arterial invasion appears to be best treated by surgical resection.

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: should we resect when resectable?

While the outcome of surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is still quite poor, over the past 2 decades, surgical outcomes have gradually improved in Japan. Because the advantages of surgery over radiochemotherapy have not yet been confirmed by randomized, controlled trials, it has long been discussed whether surgical resection could be indicated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. We recently performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical resection and radiochemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Twenty patients were assigned to the surgery group, and 22 to the radiochemotherapy group. Although there was 1 operative death, surgery offered significantly better results than radiochemotherapy, as measured by 1-year survival (62% vs. 32%, P = 0.05), mean survival time (>17 vs. 11 months, P < 0.03), and hazard ratio (0.46, P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the quality of life score or laboratory data, apart from increased diarrhea after surgery. In this article, the results of our trial are reviewed in brief, and our opinion on surgical treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer is discussed.

A phase II/III study comparing intravenous ZD9331 with gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer

ZD9331 is a novel antifolate inhibitor of thymidylate synthase (TS). This multicentre, randomised, phase II/III study compared the efficacy and safety of ZD9331 with gemcitabine in 55 patients with chemonai;ve, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients received intravenous (i.v.) ZD9331 (n=30), on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle or i.v. gemcitabine (n=25), once a week for 7 weeks followed by a 1-week rest, then on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Objective tumour response and clinical benefit response (CBR) were similar for both groups. More ZD9331 patients were alive at the data cut-off point compared with gemcitabine patients (13 and 8%, respectively). Median survival (152 versus 109 days, respectively) and time to progression (70 versus 58 days, respectively) were longer in the ZD9331 group. Nausea and vomiting (grade 1/2) were the most common toxicities in both groups. These results suggest that, in pancreatic cancer, ZD9331 is equivalent to gemcitabine and may offer a promising alternative to current therapies.

Combined chemoradiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of a regimen of combined chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. An analysis was undertaken on 27 patients from January 1992 to May 1996. Patients had a median age of 70 years (range, 40-78) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-2. Eighteen patients had locoregional disease (T2-T3, N0-N1, M0), and nine had metastatic disease. Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of 5-fluorouracil 1 gm/m2/day as a continuous infusion over 110 hours, streptozotocin 300 mg/m2/day over 30 minutes on days 2-4, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 2 hours on day 4 only, followed by a maintenance regimen of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin every 2 weeks. The radiotherapy was administered as a split course concurrently with chemotherapy to a total dose of 6000 cGy. Toxicity was frequent, but there were no treatment-related deaths. Grade III and IV toxicity was primarily limited to myelosuppression, stomatitis, and gastrointestinal side effects. Fifteen patients (56%) were able to complete either three or four cycles of chemoradiotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, response, and survival. Nine patients (33%) had an objective response (four complete response 5 partial response), two remained stable, and 16 (59%) had disease progression. Median survival for the entire group was 19 weeks (2-139), and the median survival for overall responders was 56 weeks (15-139). No patient with localized disease underwent subsequent surgical resection. The authors conclude that those patients who are able to tolerate the entire treatment regimen may achieve a useful prolongation of time to tumor progression.