Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with multiple cerebral metastases

Frameless Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery with ICON™ for Large Metastatic Brain Tumors

BACKGROUND

Recently, a new generation of gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) equipped with a frameless immobilization system has encouraged the use of fractionated GKRS as an increasingly favorable treatment option. We investigated the preliminary outcome of efficacy and toxicity associated with frameless fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (FF GKRS) for the treatment of large metastatic brain tumors.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with 17 lesions were treated using FF GKRS and included in this study, because of the large tumor size of more than 10 cm³. FF GKRS was performed based on a thermoplastic mask system for 3 to 5 consecutive days.

RESULTS

The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 12 months (range, 4-24), and the local control rate was 100%. Tumor volume decreased in 13 lesions (76.5%), and remained stable in 4 lesions (23.5%). One patient was classified as new lesion development because of the occurrence of leptomeningeal seeding regardless of the tumor volume change. Compared with the initial volume at the time of FF GKRS, tumor volume change at the last follow-up was 62.32% ± 29.80%. Cumulative survival rate at 12 months was 93.3% ± 6.4%. One patient died during the follow-up period because of the progression of the primary disease. No patient showed radiation necrosis on the follow-up images.

CONCLUSION

Daily FF GKRS by gamma knife ICON™ revealed satisfactory tumor control rate and low morbidity, despite the short follow-up period. Further prospective studies and a longer follow-up of a large cohort of patients diagnosed with brain metastases are required to elucidate the effect of FF GKRS in brain metastases.

A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for health-related quality of life in patients with surgically managed meningioma

The objective of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of health-related quality of life (HQOL) parameters combined with baseline clinical factors in patients undergoing neurosurgery for treatment of meningioma. A total of 147 patients (61 male, 86 female; mean age 43 years, range 5-77 years) who underwent resection of a meningioma between January 2002 and December 2004 were studied. HQOL was evaluated using a modified questionnaire based on the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 Scale and the Karnofsky Performance Scale. The relationships between HQOL and clinical history, radiological findings, extent of resection, histological grade and recurrence were investigated using multivariate analysis. The mean HQOL score was 73.94+/-1.79 for preoperative patients with meningioma, 84.88+/-2.14 for postoperative patients, and 91.13+/-1.61 for healthy controls. HQOL for patients with meningioma was significantly lower than that for normal controls (P<0.001), and postoperative patients had a more satisfactory HQOL than preoperative (P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that significant predictors of health-related quality of life were tumor size, extent of surgical excision, and histologic grade. Multivariate backward logistic regression yielded the regression equation HQOL=119.1097 - 1.5002X(3) - 8.6650X(6) - 10.4210X(7) (R=0.7466; where X(3) is tumor size, X(6) is extent of surgical excision, and X(7) is the histologic grade of the tumor). This equation can be used preoperatively to predict the HQOL of meningioma patients after neurosurgery. A specialized HQOL questionnaire for patients with meningioma provides useful information when planning the operative procedure, and may make it more likely that patients have a satisfactory HQOL after surgery.

Radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: critical review regarding complications

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been described as an effective treatment option for brain metastases. In general, SRS has been indicated for the treatment of lesions smaller than 3 cm in maximum diameter and for lesions considered not surgically treatable, owing to the patient's clinical status or because the lesion was located in or near eloquent brain areas. In several studies, SRS has been associated with clinical and radiographic improvement of the lesions and has been compared with surgery as the modality of choice for brain metastases. Beyond the high rate of local disease control with SRS, the few complications that have been described occurred mainly in the acute post treatment period. Most publications have addressed the outcome and effectiveness of this treatment modality but have not critically analyzed long-term complications, steroid dependency, or results relating to specific brain locations. It is important to understand the radiobiologic effects of a well-demarcated high dose of radiation on the brain lesion, controlling the tumor growth and not causing significant alteration of the related brain region, especially in an area controlling eloquent function.

Indications for resection and radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is focused on indications for resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and fractionated radiotherapy for patients with single or multiple brain metastases. Our purpose is to summarize the indications and effect of these management approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Brain metastases are a frequent challenge in patients with extracranial solid cancers. More than 40% of patients with cancer will develop metastases to the brain. While some patients present with large lesions and symptoms related to mass effect, many are diagnosed when asymptomatic tumors are found on screening studies. The main options for patients with brain metastases are whole brain radiation therapy, surgical resection, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Much information regarding outcomes, survival, management morbidity, and quality of life is available. Randomized, class III clinical trials demonstrate that multimodal therapy is important for both life quality and extended survival. A better understanding of the current therapeutic options should result in improvements in patient care.

SUMMARY

This is a review of the literature from May 2004 to June 2005 with special attention on publications related to effect on quality of life with different procedures and therapies.