High Grade Osteosarcomas

Osteosarcoma follow-up: chest X-ray or computed tomography?

Background

In patients with relapsed osteosarcoma, the surgical excision of all metastases, defined as second complete remission (CR-2), is the factor that mainly influences post-relapse survival (PRS). Currently a validated follow-up policy for osteosarcoma is not available, both chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) are suggested for lung surveillance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the type of imaging technique used for chest surveillance, chest X-ray or CT, influenced the rate of CR-2 and prognosis in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma.

Methods

Patients up to 40 years with extremity osteosarcoma enrolled in consecutive clinical trials and treated at the Rizzoli Institute from 1986 to 2009 were identified. Only patients who had lung metastases alone as first pattern of recurrence were considered for the analysis. The rate of CR-2, overall survival (OS) and PRS were the end-points of the study.

Results

The median follow-up was 47 months (1–300), 215 patients were eligible. Lung metastases were detected by chest X-ray in 100 (47%) patients, by CT in 112 (52%) and by symptoms in 3 (1%). CR-2 rate was 60% for patients followed by X-rays and 88% for those followed by CT (p < .0001). 5-year PRS was 30% (95% CI 21–39) in the X-ray group and 49% (95% CI 39–59) in the CT group (p = .0004). 5-year OS was 35% (95% CI 26–44) in the X-ray group and 60% (95% CI 51–70) in the CT group (p = .004).

Conclusions

A follow-up strategy with chest CT leads to a higher rate of CR-2 and significantly improves PRS and OS in osteosarcoma, compared to chest X-ray.

Pirarubicin versus doxorubicin in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma: does the analog matter?

Pirarubicin (THP), a novel anthracycline derivative of doxorubicin (ADM), is effective in treating patients with advanced, relapsed or recurrent high-grade osteosarcoma. But its role in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma is still not defined. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of THP-containing chemotherapy for osteosarcoma in comparison with ADM-containing chemotherapy to determine differences in efficacy and toxicities between THP- and ADM-containing regimens. From January 2008 to May 2011, 112 stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma patients were treated in our institute. Fifty-four patients received a median 6 cycles of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of THP (pirarubicin), DDP (cisplatin), IFO (ifosfamide) and MTX (methotrexate), while 58 patients received a median 6 cycles of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of ADM (doxorubicin), DDP (cisplatin), IFO (ifosfamide) and MTX (methotrexate). Efficacy and toxicity of the 2 anthracyclines given as combination chemotherapy were assessed in these patients. The limb salvage rate, histologic response rate, 2-year recurrence rate, 2-year metastasis rate, 2-year disease-free survival rate, 2-year overall survival rate, median disease-free survival time (DFS) and median overall survival time (OS) in THP-containing group were similar to that in ADM-containing group. Toxicities were well balanced in two groups. No death related to chemotherapy was observed. Left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged 1 and 2 years after chemotherapy in two groups. Efficacy and toxicity of THP-containing combination are similar to those of ADM-containing combination in neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIB limb high-grade osteosarcoma.

The threat of misdiagnosis of primary osteosarcoma over the age of 60: a series of seven cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma is the most common, non-haematopoietic, primary malignant bone tumour with an incidence of 0.3-0.5 per 100,000. There is some discrepancy in literature concerning the peaks of incidence of osteosarcoma. Some describe only one peak which arises in adolescence, whilst others report a bimodal age distribution with a second peak over the age of 60. In this retrospective study, we evaluated osteosarcoma patients over age 60 treated at our department and reviewed previous studies from the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients (40 male, 24 female) with a mean age of 29 years (from 7 to 82) were treated for primary osteosarcomas. At the time of diagnosis, seven patients (two male and five female) were over 60 years of age with a mean follow-up of 46 months after definite diagnosis.

RESULTS

Three out of seven osteosarcomas were primarily radiologically or histologically misdiagnosed, but only one was mistreated with intramedullary nailing at a trauma centre. At last follow-up, two patients had died from the disease, three were alive with disease, and two had no evidence of osteosarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an increased incidence of primary osteosarcoma in the elderly; yet, older patients had a higher rate of misdiagnosis due to untypical radiological findings in combination with longer times from the onset of first symptoms to definite diagnosis. In cases of pathological fracture, it is essential to assess whether it is caused by mechanical stress or a primary or secondary tumour before leading into mistreatment, especially in older patients.

Emerging drugs for high-grade osteosarcoma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in children and adolescents. This review focuses on the most promising therapeutic markers and drugs which may potentially be considered for innovative high-grade OS treatments.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The list of drugs and compounds reviewed has been generated by taking into account those which target markers of potential clinical interest for high-grade OS and have been included in Phase I, II or III clinical trials. The literature search covers the last 40 years, starting from the first OS chemotherapy reports of the early 1970s. Particular relevance was given to reports and reviews on new targeted therapies of possible clinical usefulness for high-grade OS.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review gives an updated overview of novel therapeutic approaches which have been or are going to be evaluated in Phase I/II/III clinical studies for high-grade OS.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it can be predicted that in the next 5 - 10 years, new agents to be included in innovative treatment strategies for selected subgroups of high-grade OS patients may become available.

Prognostic value of CCN3 in osteosarcoma

PURPOSE

Osteosarcoma, the most common bone tumor, lacks prognostic markers that could distinguish patients before therapy and drive treatment choices. We assessed the prognostic value of CCN1, CCN2, and CCN3 genes, involved in fundamental biological processes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Expression of CCN1, CCN2, and CCN3 was measured by quantitative PCR in 45 newly diagnosed osteosarcomas. Cancer-specific survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations with osteoblastic differentiation and/or drug response genes were assessed in tumor cells using Spearman correlation and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

CCN1 and CCN2 expression was associated with genes involved in commitment of mesenchymal stem cells toward osteoblasts and in early phases of osteoblastic differentiation (RUNX family genes; cadherin 4, 11, and 13; jun and fos; collagen I and SPARC). Although CCN3 is barely expressed in normal proliferating osteoblasts and mesenchymal stem cells, its expression was generally high in osteosarcoma and its level of expression did not correlate with any specific osteoblastic differentiation genes. High expression of CCN3 significantly correlated with worse prognosis in osteosarcoma. This may be only partly explained by the association with the expression of multidrug resistance-related protein 1 and 4, two ATP-binding cassette transporters that also acted as predictors of worse outcome in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed temporal and coordinated expression of CCN1, CCN2, and CCN3 genes during osteoblastic differentiation and highlighted significant differences between human normal and osteosarcoma cell differentiation in vitro. CCN1 and CCN2 expression shows no prognostic relevance in osteosarcoma. In contrast, assessment for CCN3 expression levels at diagnosis may represent a useful molecular tool to early identification of patients with different prognosis.

Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical expression of ezrin in non-metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Ezrin is a membrane-cytoskeleton linker protein involved in regulating growth and metastatic behaviour of cancer cells. The study evaluated ezrin expression and its prognostic value in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma.

PROCEDURES

Ezrin expression and pattern of staining (cytoplasmic or membraneous and cytoplasmic) were assessed using immunohistochemistry on slides from tumour biopsy. We studied 95 patients (median 16 years, range: 4-39 years) with primary non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (80%) showed ezrin immunoreactivity: in cytoplasm (37, 47%) and in cytoplasm and membrane (42, 53%) of tumour cells. Immunohistochemical staining score was: 1+ (16, 24%), 2+ (10, 13%), 3+ (17, 21.5%) and 4+ (36, 45.5%). Ezrin and score expression were not related to gender, site, alkaline phosphatase (AP), LDH serum levels, chemotherapy-induced tumour necrosis or patient outcome. A significant association was seen between expression pattern and prognosis. The 3-year probability of disease-free survival was 80% for patients with only cytoplasmic immunostaining and 54% for patients with cytoplasmic and membranous immunostaining (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Ezrin immunoreactivity can be detected in the majority of patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity. The pattern of ezrin staining can identify patients with different risks of relapse. In patients who only have ezrin cytoplasmic expression, a probability of EFS >80% at 5 years can be expected. These results suggest further investigations to define the relation between expression pattern, ezrin functional status and outcome in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma.

Primary osteosarcoma of the thoracic spine: report of an unusual elderly patient with autopsy findings

STUDY DESIGN

A case report of primary osteosarcoma of the spine in an elderly patient.

OBJECTIVE

The histopathological features of osteosarcoma vary widely, often leading to diagnostic difficulties particularly when there is little evidence of osteoid formation. The report describes the difficulty in the diagnosis of osteosarcoma of the thoracic vertebra.

SETTING

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui University Faculty of Medicine, Fukui, Japan.

METHOD

A 78-year-old man presented with paraparesis and underwent urgent anterior excision of a primary spinal tumor emanating from the T10 vertebra followed by artificial vertebral replacement. The patient eventually died of disseminated disease of vertebral osteosarcoma.

RESULTS

Samples from the T10 vertebral tumor showed neoplastic growth of atypical spindle-shaped cells, with foci of storiform-like proliferation. The tissue also demonstrated positive immunohistochemical staining for vimentin and alpha-smooth muscle actin and a tentative diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma was made. However, a metastatic nodule of the chest wall at autopsy showed focal osteoid formation, a finding not seen in the primary tumor.

CONCLUSION

Early detection and accurate diagnosis is important for improving not only patient prognosis but also the quality of life. We should always consider this rare entity, particularly in elderly patients who present with back pain and vertebral collapse.