Influence of 1.5-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging on surgical decision making

En-Bloc Resection Versus Resection After Evacuation and Suction of the Content for Orbital Optic Nerve Glioma Causing Visual Loss and Disfiguring Proptosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of two different techniques of resection for optic nerve gliomas confined to the intra-orbital segment.

METHODS

This prospective, comparable, clinical interventional case series was conducted at the orbital clinic of Assiut University Hospital, the referral centre of Upper Egypt in the period between 2006 and 2018. The study included 10 children with optic nerve gliomas confined to the intra-orbital part without intracanalicular or intracranial extension and causing severe visual loss and disfiguring proptosis. In all cases, lateral orbitotomy was performed to expose the mass. In 5 cases (group A), the glioma was resected en-bloc. In 5 cases (group B), a new technique of resection was introduced. The wall of the glioma was incised, the content was evacuated and suctioned and followed by resection under good visualization of the markedly reduced mass in size.

RESULTS

In the 2 groups, no tumour regrowth was reported during the follow-up period of 3-12 years. In group A, the 5 cases developed postoperative third nerve damage with paralytic ptosis and one case had severe neurotrophic keratitis ended by dense corneal opacity. In group B, a healthy ipsilateral eye was preserved in all cases and no one case developed postoperative paralytic ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction of size of an intra-orbital optic nerve glioma by evacuation and suction of the content before resection is highly recommended. This makes the surgical field during resection more visible and minimizes the possibility of third or other nerves damage.

How to Build a Neurosurgical Oncology Practice Specializing in Gliomas

For the neurosurgical oncologist, a specialty practice in gliomas represents an intersection of tailored surgical approaches, emerging intraoperative technologies, expanding surgical trial portfolios, and new paradigms in glioma biology. Assembling these disparate pieces into a cohesive career trajectory is a difficult task but ultimately enables the subspecialist to navigate all domains relevant to improving glioma patient outcomes. Within the larger clinical and basic science community, thoughtful integration and intensive collaborations are essential mechanisms when building a multidisciplinary glioma program.

Initial experience of using high field strength intraoperative MRI for neurosurgical procedures

We report our initial experience to optimize neurosurgical procedures using high field strength intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IOMRI) in 300 consecutive patients as high field strength IOMRI rapidly becomes the standard of care for neurosurgical procedures. Three sequential groups (groups A, B, C; n=100 each) were compared with respect to time management, complications and technical difficulties to assess improvement in these parameters with experience. We observed a reduction in the number of technical difficulties (p<0.001), time to induction (p<0.001) and total anesthesia time (p=0.007) in sequential groups. IOMRI was performed for neuronavigation guidance (n=252) and intraoperative validation of extent of resection (EOR; n=67). Performing IOMRI increased the EOR over and beyond the primary surgical attempt in 20.5% (29/141) and 18% (11/61) of patients undergoing glioma and pituitary surgery, respectively. Overall, EOR improved in 59.7% of patients undergoing IOMRI (40/67). Intraoperative tractography and real time navigation using re-uploaded IOMRI images (accounting for brain shift) helps in intraoperative planning to reduce complications. IOMRI is an asset to neurosurgeons, helping to augment the EOR, especially in glioma and pituitary surgery, with no significant increase in morbidity to the patient.

Frameless stereotactic functional neuronavigation combined with intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging as a strategy in highly eloquent located tumors causing epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Intractable epilepsy due to tumors located in highly eloquent brain regions is often considered surgically inaccessible because of a high risk of postoperative neurological deterioration. Intraoperative MRI and functional navigation contribute to overcome this problem.

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively investigate the long-term results and impact of functional neuronavigation and 1.5-tesla intraoperative MRI on patients who underwent surgery of tumors associated with epilepsy located close to or within eloquent brain areas.

METHODS

Nineteen patients (9 female, 10 male, mean age 41.4 ± 13.4 years, 11 low-grade and 8 high-grade glial tumors) were evaluated preoperatively using BOLD imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging tractography and magnetoencephalography. Functional data were implemented into neuronavigation in this multimodal approach.

RESULTS

In 14 of 19 patients (74%), complete resection was achieved, and in 5 patients significant tumor volume reduction was accomplished. Eight of 14 (57%) complete resections were achieved only by performing an intraoperative image update. Neurological deterioration was found permanently in 2 patients. After a mean follow-up of 43.8 ± 23.8 months, 15 patients (79%) became seizure free (Engel class Ia).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the highly eloquent location of tumors causing intractable epilepsy, our multimodal approach led to complete resection in more than two-thirds of patients with an acceptable neurological morbidity and excellent long-term seizure control.

Emerging operative strategies in neurosurgical oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, the safety and efficacy of neurosurgical intervention has rapidly improved for brain tumor patients. Technological advances, combined with refined intraoperative techniques, now enable well tolerated surgical access to any region of the human brain. For patients with gliomas, these improvements have redefined the clinical possibilities, and here we review several emerging operative strategies that are essential for next-generation neurosurgical oncologists and major brain tumor centers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The value of glioma extent of resection remains controversial, but review of the modern literature reveals important opportunities for early neurosurgical intervention. Although microsurgical resection must be balanced by the risk of neurological compromise, improvements in intraoperative stimulation techniques now enable resection of highly eloquent tumors with minimal morbidity. Additionally, the emergence of fluorescence-guided surgery as a new operative paradigm provides a unique opportunity to resect tumors to the margins of microscopic infiltration.

SUMMARY

Neurosurgical intervention remains the first step in effective glioma management. With intraoperative mapping techniques, aggressive microsurgical resection can be safely pursued even when tumors occupy essential functional pathways. With the development of tumor-specific fluorophores, such as 5-aminolevulinic acid, real-time microscopic visualization of tumor infiltration can be surgically targeted prior to adjuvant therapy.

Optimizing the extent of resection in eloquently located gliomas by combining intraoperative MRI guidance with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Several methods have been introduced to improve the extent of resection in glioma surgery. Yet, radical tumor resections must not be attempted at the cost of neurological deterioration. We sought to assess whether the use of an intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in combination with multimodal neurophysiological monitoring is suitable to increase the extent of resection without endangering neurological function in patients with eloquently located gliomas. Fifty-four patients were included in this study. In 21 patients (38.9 %), iMRI led to additional tumor resection. A radiologically complete resection was achieved in 31 patients (57.4 %), while in 12 of these, iMRI had depicted residual tumor tissue before resection was continued. The mean extent of resection was 92.1 % according to volumetric analyses. Postoperatively, 13 patients (24.1 %) showed new or worsening of pre-existing sensory motor deficits. They were severe in 4 patients (7.4 %). There was no correlation between the occurrence of either any new (P = 0.77) or severe (P = 1.0) sensory motor deficit and continued resection after intraoperative image acquisition. Likewise, tumor location, histology, and tumor recurrence did not influence complication rate on uni- and multivariate analysis. We conclude that the combination of iMRI guidance with multimodal neurophysiological monitoring allows for extended resections in glioma surgery without inducing higher rates of neurological deficits, even in patients with eloquently located tumors.

Clinical and economic outcomes of low-field intraoperative MRI-guided tumor resection neurosurgery

PURPOSE

To compare low-field (0.15 T) intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI)-guided tumor resection with both conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI)-guided tumor resection and high-field (1.5 T) iMRI-guided resection from the clinical and economic point of view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared 65 iMRI patients with 65 cMRI patients in terms of hospital length of stay, repeat resection rate, repeat resection interval, complication rate, cost to the patient, cost to the hospital, and cost effectiveness. In addition, we compared our low-field results with previously published high-field results.

RESULTS

The complication rate was lower for iMRI vs. cMRI in patients presenting for their initial tumor resection (45 vs. 57 complications, P = 0.048). The iMRI repeat resection interval was longer for this cohort (20.1 vs. 6.7 months, P = 0.020). iMRI was more cost-effective than cMRI for patients who had repeat resections ($10,690/RFY vs. $76,874/RFY, P < 0.001). We found no other clinical or economic differences between iMRI- and cMRI-guided tumor resection surgeries. Overall, we did not find the advantages to low-field iMRI that have been reported for high-field iMRI.

CONCLUSION

There is no adequate justification for the widespread installation of low-field iMRI in its current development state.

Intraoperative confocal microscopy in the visualization of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence in low-grade gliomas

OBJECT

Greater extent of resection (EOR) for patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) corresponds with improved clinical outcome, yet remains a central challenge to the neurosurgical oncologist. Although 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced tumor fluorescence is a strategy that can improve EOR in gliomas, only glioblastomas routinely fluoresce following 5-ALA administration. Intraoperative confocal microscopy adapts conventional confocal technology to a handheld probe that provides real-time fluorescent imaging at up to 1000× magnification. The authors report a combined approach in which intraoperative confocal microscopy is used to visualize 5-ALA tumor fluorescence in LGGs during the course of microsurgical resection.

METHODS

Following 5-ALA administration, patients with newly diagnosed LGG underwent microsurgical resection. Intraoperative confocal microscopy was conducted at the following points: 1) initial encounter with the tumor; 2) the midpoint of tumor resection; and 3) the presumed brain-tumor interface. Histopathological analysis of these sites correlated tumor infiltration with intraoperative cellular tumor fluorescence.

RESULTS

Ten consecutive patients with WHO Grades I and II gliomas underwent microsurgical resection with 5-ALA and intraoperative confocal microscopy. Macroscopic tumor fluorescence was not evident in any patient. However, in each case, intraoperative confocal microscopy identified tumor fluorescence at a cellular level, a finding that corresponded to tumor infiltration on matched histological analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative confocal microscopy can visualize cellular 5-ALA-induced tumor fluorescence within LGGs and at the brain-tumor interface. To assess the clinical value of 5-ALA for high-grade gliomas in conjunction with neuronavigation, and for LGGs in combination with intraoperative confocal microscopy and neuronavigation, a Phase IIIa randomized placebo-controlled trial (BALANCE) is underway at the authors' institution.

Quantification of Glioma Removal by Intraoperative High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Update

BACKGROUND:

The beneficial role of the extent of resection (EOR) in glioma surgery in correlation to increased survival remains controversial. However, common literature favors maximum EOR with preservation of neurological function, which is shown to be associated with a significantly improved outcome.

OBJECTIVE:

In order to obtain a maximum EOR, it was examined whether high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) combined with multimodal navigation contributes to a significantly improved EOR in glioma surgery.

METHODS:

Two hundred ninety-three glioma patients underwent craniotomy and tumor resection with the aid of intraoperative 1.5 T MRI and integrated multimodal navigation. In cases of remnant tumor, an update of navigation was performed with intraoperative images. Tumor volume was quantified pre- and intraoperatively by segmentation of T2 abnormality in low-grade and contrast enhancement in high-grade gliomas.

RESULTS:

In 25.9% of all cases examined, additional tumor mass was removed as a result of iMRI. This led to complete tumor resection in 20 cases, increasing the rate of gross-total removal from 31.7% to 38.6%. In 56 patients, additional but incomplete resection was performed because of the close location to eloquent brain areas. Volumetric analysis showed a significantly (P &lt; .01) reduced mean percentage of tumor volume following additional further resection after iMRI from 33.5% ± 25.1% to 14.7% ± 23.3% (World Health Organization [WHO] grade I, 32.8% ± 21.9% to 6.1% ± 18.8%; WHO grade II, 24.4% ± 25.1% to 10.8% ± 11.0%; WHO grade III, 35.1% ± 27.3% to 24.8% ± 26.3%; WHO grade IV, 34.2% ± 23.7% to 1.2% ± 16.2%).

CONCLUSION:

MRI in conjunction with multimodal navigation and an intraoperative updating procedure enlarges tumor-volume reduction in glioma surgery significantly without higher postoperative morbidity.

Influence of iMRI-Guidance on the Extent of Resection and Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme

Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is used in glioma surgery mainly to determine the extent of resection, allowing surgeons to immediately continue resection in case of residual tumor tissue. The aim of this study is to report on the influence of the use of iMRI on the extent of resection and survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

We analyzed our prospectively collected database of patients with GBM operated upon during the initial period after installation of an iMRI; between July 2004 and December 2005, all patients with GBM undergoing intended complete tumor resection were included in this study, while patients undergoing mere tumor biopsy or intended incomplete resection were not.

In total, 43 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 patients (23.3%) were operated upon with the help of iMRI while 33 underwent conventional tumor resection. All patients underwent postoperative high-field MR imaging at 1.5 Tesla to determine the extent of resection. Subsequently, all patients received adjuvant treatment. Median patient age was 60.0 years; median overall survival was 70.7 weeks. Radiologically complete tumor resection (P < 0.001) and the administration of temozolomide chemotherapy (P < 0.01) were statistically significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. The rate of complete tumor resections was significantly higher in the iMRI group than in the conventional surgery group (P < 0.05). Patient age was not a prognostic factor in our series of patients (P = 0.22). Intraoperative MRI is a helpful tool to increase the extent of resection in GBM surgery and thereby improve patient survival.

First intraoperative, shared-resource, ultrahigh-field 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system and its application in low-grade glioma resection

OBJECT

The authors describe the first shared-resource, 3-T intraoperative MR (ioMR) imaging system and analyze its impact on low-grade glioma (LGG) resection with an emphasis on the use of intraoperative proton MR spectroscopy.

METHODS

The Acibadem University ioMR imaging facility houses a 3-T Siemens Trio system and consists of interconnected but independent MR imaging and surgical suites. Neurosurgery is performed using regular ferromagnetic equipment, and a patient can be transferred to the ioMR imaging system within 1.5 minutes by using a floating table. The ioMR imaging protocol takes < 10 minutes including the transfer, and the authors obtain very high-resolution T2-weighted MR images without the use of intravenous contrast. Functional sequences are performed when needed. A new 5-pin headrest-head coil combination and floating transfer table were specifically designed for this system.

RESULTS

Since the facility became operational in June 2004, 56 LGG resections have been performed using ioMR imaging, and > 19,000 outpatient MR imaging procedures have been conducted. First-look MR imaging studies led to further resection attempts in 37.5% of cases as well as a 32.3% increase in the number of gross-total resections. Intraoperative ultrasonography detected 16% of the tumor remnants. Intraoperative proton MR spectroscopy and diffusion weighted MR imaging were used to differentiate residual tumor tissue from peritumoral parenchymal changes. Functional and diffusion tensor MR imaging sequences were used both pre- and postoperatively but not intraoperatively. No infections or other procedure-related complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel, shared-resource, ultrahigh-field, 3-T ioMR imaging system is a cost-effective means of affording a highly capable ioMR imaging system and increases the efficiency of LGG resections.

Reliability of intraoperative high-resolution 2D ultrasound as an alternative to high–field strength MR imaging for tumor resection control: a prospective comparative study

Object

Ultrasound may be a reliable but simpler alternative to intraoperative MR imaging (iMR imaging) for tumor resection control. However, its reliability in the detection of tumor remnants has not been definitely proven. The aim of the study was to compare high-field iMR imaging (1.5 T) and high-resolution 2D ultrasound in terms of tumor resection control.

Methods

A prospective comparative study of 26 consecutive patients was performed. The following parameters were compared: the existence of tumor remnants after presumed radical removal and the quality of the images. Tumor remnants were categorized as: detectable with both imaging modalities or visible only with 1 modality.

Results

Tumor remnants were detected in 21 cases (80.8%) with iMR imaging. All large remnants were demonstrated with both modalities, and their image quality was good. Two-dimensional ultrasound was not as effective in detecting remnants < 1 cm. Two remnants detected with iMR imaging were missed by ultrasound. In 2 cases suspicious signals visible only on ultrasound images were misinterpreted as remnants but turned out to be a blood clot and peritumoral parenchyma. The average time for acquisition of an ultrasound image was 2 minutes, whereas that for an iMR image was ~ 10 minutes. Neither modality resulted in any procedure-related complications or morbidity.

Conclusions

Intraoperative MR imaging is more precise in detecting small tumor remnants than 2D ultrasound. Nevertheless, the latter may be used as a less expensive and less time-consuming alternative that provides almost real-time feedback information. Its accuracy is highest in case of more confined, deeply located remnants. In cases of more superficially located remnants, its role is more limited.

The predictive value of low–field strength magnetic resonance imaging for intraoperative residual tumor detection

Object

Neurosurgeons have been utilizing intraoperative MR (iMR) imaging to evaluate the extent of tumor resection since the 1990s. A low–field strength (0.12 T) MR imaging unit (PoleStar N20, Medtronic) is a practical and relatively inexpensive iMR imaging system that has found increased use in neurosurgery. The gold standard for postoperative detection of residual tumor has been high-strength MR imaging performed within 48 hours of resection. The object of this study was to determine the predictive concordance of low-strength iMR imaging with standard high-strength MR imaging for detection of residual tumor.

Methods

The authors retrospectively evaluated the MR images from 74 intracranial tumor resections, comparing the intraoperative images obtained using a 0.12-T iMR imaging unit to the immediate postoperative images obtained using a standard 1.5-T MR imaging unit within 48 hours after surgery.

Results

The sensitivity of low-field MR imaging for detection of residual tumor was 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.86), and its specificity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.83–1). When only glial tumors (42 of the 74 lesions) were analyzed, the sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI 0.59–0.94) and the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.73–1).

Conclusions

These data could assist the neurosurgeon who has to decide intraoperatively whether the observed iMR images show residual tumor or not.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain tumor resection

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain activation data obtained at both 1.5 and 3 T to guide brain tumor resections using 1.5-T intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to March 2006, fMRI was performed on 29 patients before attempted brain tumor resection. Functional MRI was used to identify and coregister areas of brain activation for motor (n = 18), speech (n = 6), motor and speech (n = 4), and short-term memory and speech (n = 1) with respect to the tumor using a 1.5-T and two 3-T MRI scanners. Surgical resection was accomplished using 2 different 1.5-T ioMRI systems. The appropriate MRI scan sequences were obtained during surgery to determine and maximize the extent of the surgical resection depending on the tumor type.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients, 20 (69%) had radiographically complete fMRI-guided tumor resections and 2 (7%) had successful MRI-guided brain biopsy because of the proximity of their astrocytomas to the eloquent cortex. The tumors were oligodendrogliomas (n = 16), astrocytomas (n = 4), meningiomas (n = 3), glioblastomas multiforme (n = 2), a pleomorphic astrocytoma (n = 1), and a dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (n = 1). The preoperative fMRI data were accurate in all cases. After tumor resection, 7 patients (26%) had transient neurologic deficits that resolved completely within 1 month of the surgical procedure in all cases. No adverse events associated with ferromagnetic instrumentation occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional MRI was accurate for localizing areas of eloquent neurologic function before ioMRI-guided brain tumor resection.

Usefulness of Intraoperative Ultra Low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma Surgery

Objective:

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of a mobile, intraoperative 0.15-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in glioma surgery.

Methods:

We analyzed our prospectively collected database of patients with glial tumors who underwent tumor resection with the use of an intraoperative ultra low-field MRI scanner (PoleStar N-20; Odin Medical Technologies, Yokneam, Israel/Medtronic, Louisville, CO). Sixty-three patients with World Health Organization Grade II to IV tumors were included in the study. All patients were subjected to postoperative 1.5-T imaging to confirm the extent of resection.

Results:

Intraoperative image quality was sufficient for navigation and resection control in both high-and low-grade tumors. Primarily enhancing tumors were best detected on T1-weighted imaging, whereas fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences proved best for nonenhancing tumors. Intraoperative resection control led to further tumor resection in 12 (28.6%) of 42 patients with contrast-enhancing tumors and in 10(47.6%) of 21 patients with noncontrast-enhancing tumors. In contrast-enhancing tumors, further resection led to an increased rate of complete tumor resection (71.2 versus 52.4%), and the surgical goal of gross total removal or subtotal resection was achieved in all cases (100.0%). In patients with noncontrast-enhancing tumors, the surgical goal was achieved in 19 (90.5%) of 21 cases, as intraoperative MRI findings were inconsistent with postoperative high-field imaging in 2 cases.

Conclusion:

The use of the PoleStar N-20 intraoperative ultra low-field MRI scanner helps to evaluate the extent of resection in glioma surgery. Further tumor resection after intraoperative scanning leads to an increased rate of complete tumor resection, especially in patients with contrast-enhancing tumors. However, in noncontrast-enhancing tumors, the intraoperative visualization of a complete resection seems less specific, when compared with postoperative 1.5-T MRI.

Advances in brain tumor surgery

Advances in the fields of molecular and translational research, oncology, and surgery have emboldened the medical community to believe that intrinsic brain tumors may be treatable. Intraoperative imaging and brain mapping allow operations adjacent to eloquent cortex and more radical resection of tumors with increased confidence and safety. Despite these advances, the infiltrating edge of a neoplasm and distant microscopic satellite lesions will never be amendable to a surgical cure. Indeed, it is continued research into the delivery of an efficacious chemobiologic agent that will eventually allows us to manage this primary cause of treatment failure.

Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future

INTRODUCTION

Anatomy teaching has perhaps the longest history of any component of formalised medical education. In this article we briefly consider the history of dissection, but also review the neglected topic of the history of the use of living anatomy.

CURRENT DEBATES

The current debates about the advantages and disadvantages of cadavers, prosection versus dissection, and the use of living anatomy and radiology instead of cadavers are discussed.

THE FUTURE

Future prospects are considered, along with some of the factors that might inhibit change.

3-Tesla intraoperative MR imaging for neurosurgery

Intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) image-guided neurosurgery has been performed since 1994. Using a 1.5-Tesla (T) intraoperative MR imaging system, we have performed more than 750 interventional procedures. Having validated the safety and efficacy of this surgical technique that is relatively amenable to nearly all new in-hospital MR suites, we sought to adapt this approach at our sister hospital where a new short-bore 3-T MR suite was being installed. Using many of the lessons learned from our initial experience at 1.5-T, we designed a new interventional suite that would enable surgery to be performed entirely within a 3-T MR environment. All surgical instrumentation including electrocautery, fiberoptic headlamp, power drill, and ultrasonic aspirator was entirely MR-compatible. A few items with limited ferromagnetism were utilized within the magnetic field under strict precaution. From 2/04 to 7/05, those cases initially performed within the 3-T surgical suite included one drainage and reservoir placement for a cystic craniopharyngioma, five brain biopsies and two craniotomies; one for open brain biopsy and another for lesion resection. The craniopharyngioma was successfully aspirated and had the reservoir catheter placed within the cyst. All five brain biopsies yielded diagnostic tissue. The craniotomy for mass resection demonstrated radiation necrosis. Although the metallic artifact from the biopsy needle was more prominent than at 1.5-T, accurate image interpretation was possible. Surgical needles, disposable scalpel, disposable razor, and surgical stapler were minimally ferromagnetic and safely controlled by the surgeon. There were no adverse events associated with any procedure. MR-guided neurosurgery can be safely and effectively performed at 3-T. The surgical environment at 3-T is comparable to that present at 1.5-T.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided resection of low-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to guide the resection of low-grade gliomas (LGG).

METHODS

From September 1997 to February 2003, fMRI was performed in 16 patients (age, 15-43 years) before an attempted surgical resection of LGG. Functional imaging was used to identify and coregister eloquent cortices pertinent to motor (10), speech (3), motor and speech (2), and short-term memory and speech (1) activation with respect to the tumor using a 1.5-T interventional MRI system. Intraoperatively acquired T(2)-weighted and turbo-fluid attenuated inversion recovery images were used to assess the completeness of surgical resection.

RESULTS

Tumors included 10 oligodendrogliomas, 4 astrocytomas, 1 dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, and 1 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. In every case, the preoperative brain activation study accurately determined the location of neurologic function. After surgery, one patient had a transient hemiparesis and another had a temporary apraxia. Ten patients had radiographically complete resections and 5 with oligodendrogliomas had incomplete resections because of the proximity of their tumors to functional areas. Only one patient with an astrocytoma in the motor strip received postoperative radiation therapy. To date, radiographic tumor progression has not been seen in any patient with either a partial or a complete resection with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 12-87 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional MRI was accurate for identifying areas of neurologic function before surgical resection of LGG. Patients with complete radiographic resections or with incompletely resected oligodendrogliomas can be safely followed radiographically after surgery. Radiation therapy was reserved for infiltrating astrocytomas that were not completely resectable.

Intraoperative MR Imaging

With the rapid evolution of technologic advances in neurosurgery, it is no surprise that the use of MR imaging to guide the performance of safe and effective surgical procedures is at the forefront of development. This article highlights the current capabilities of intraoperative MR-guided surgery for a variety of neurosurgical procedures and traces the evolution of the field to its present level of technical sophistication. The costs of intraoperative MR imaging and its future directions are discussed.

1.5 T: spectroscopy-supported brain biopsy

The technique for performing brain biopsy has evolved significantly over the last three decades. Intraoperative MRI guidance has enhanced the diagnostic rate for brain biopsy by now allowing neurosurgeons to compensate for brain shift while performing the procedure in near-real time. The development of a trajectory guide enables the neurosurgeon to determine a safe and accurate path for intraoperative MRI-guided brain biopsy and to secure the position of the needle within the target tissue. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been used to help distinguish recurrent brain tumor from the effect of previous treatments by measuring specific metabolites within the area of concern. Combining the use of a trajectory guide with MRS should enhance the diagnostic yield for MRI-guided brain biopsy.