Central and peripheral electrical stimulation of the nervous system in the treatment of chronic pain

Translational aspects of deep brain stimulation for chronic pain

The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of chronic pain was one of the first applications of this technique in functional neurosurgery. Established brain targets in the clinic include the periaqueductal (PAG)/periventricular gray matter (PVG) and sensory thalamic nuclei. More recently, the anterior cingulum (ACC) and the ventral striatum/anterior limb of the internal capsule (VS/ALIC) have been investigated for the treatment of emotional components of pain. In the clinic, most studies showed a response in 20%-70% of patients. In various applications of DBS, animal models either provided the rationale for the development of clinical trials or were utilized as a tool to study potential mechanisms of stimulation responses. Despite the complex nature of pain and the fact that animal models cannot reliably reflect the subjective nature of this condition, multiple preparations have emerged over the years. Overall, DBS was shown to produce an antinociceptive effect in rodents when delivered to targets known to induce analgesic effects in humans, suggesting a good predictive validity. Compared to the relatively high number of clinical trials in the field, however, the number of animal studies has been somewhat limited. Additional investigation using modern neuroscience techniques could unravel the mechanisms and neurocircuitry involved in the analgesic effects of DBS and help to optimize this therapy.

Refractory neuropathic pain from a median nerve injury: spinal cord or peripheral nerve stimulation? A case report

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most frequently used neuromodulation technique even for neurogenic pain from a peripheral nerve injury although peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been designed for this purpose. PNS appears less invasive than SCS or deep brain stimulation. It provides greater and specific target coverage and it could be more cost-effective than SCS because low electrical stimulation is exclusively delivered to the precise painful territory. We report a case of excellent result following median nerve stimulation at arm level after SCS failure and a 10-year history of intense pain. PNS would certainly have been considered much earlier if it was accepted and reimbursed by the Belgium National Insurance. PNS is a safe, simple, and efficient technique available for decades but it is still considered as experimental and underemployed. Belgian National Insurance fears an explosion of indications on neuromodulation if PNS was reimbursed. We consider that PNS aside SCS and other neuromodulation techniques should be made available in Belgium in case of peripheral chronic neuropathic pain.

Simultaneous trial of deep brain and motor cortex stimulation in chronic intractable neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Both motor cortex stimulation (MCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventralis caudalis (Vc) thalamus have been shown to be effective in chronic neuropathic pain, and the modulation of thalamic and thalamocortical activity is regarded as a possible mechanism. Although Vc DBS and MCS have a common analgesic mechanism, the application of MCS and DBS is still considered empirical, and there is no consensus on which method is better.

METHODS

We performed a simultaneous trial of thalamic Vc DBS and MCS in 9 patients with chronic neuropathic pain and investigated the results of the stimulation trial and long-term pain relief.

RESULTS

Of the 9 patients initially implanted with both DBS and MCS electrodes, 8 (89%) had a successful trial; 6 of these 8 patients (75%) responded to MCS, and the remaining 2 responded to Vc DBS. During the long-term follow-up, the mean numeric rating scale score decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The percentages of pain relief in the chronic MCS group and the chronic DBS group were 37.9 ± 16.5 and 37.5%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.157).

CONCLUSION

Considering the initial success rate and the less invasive nature of epidural MCS compared with DBS, we think that MCS would be a more reasonable initial means of treatment for chronic intractable neuropathic pain.

Comparison of intensity-dependent inhibition of spinal wide-dynamic range neurons by dorsal column and peripheral nerve stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) are thought to reduce pain by activating a sufficient number of large myelinated (Aβ) fibres, which in turn initiate spinal segmental mechanisms of analgesia. However, the volume of neuronal activity and how this activity is associated with different treatment targets is unclear under neuropathic pain conditions.

METHODS

We sought to delineate the intensity-dependent mechanisms of SCS and PNS analgesia by in vivo extracellular recordings from spinal wide-dynamic range neurons in nerve-injured rats. To mimic therapeutic SCS and PNS, we used bipolar needle electrodes and platinum hook electrodes to stimulate the dorsal column and the tibial nerve, respectively. Compound action potentials were recorded to calibrate the amplitude of conditioning stimulation required to activate A-fibres and thus titrate the volume of activation.

RESULTS

Dorsal column stimulation (50 Hz, five intensities) inhibited the windup (a short form of neuronal sensitization) and the C-component response of wide-dynamic range neurons to graded intracutaneous electrical stimuli in an intensity-dependent manner. Tibial nerve stimulation (50 Hz, three intensities) also suppressed the windup in an intensity-dependent fashion but did not affect the acute C-component response.

CONCLUSIONS

SCS and PNS may offer similar inhibition of short-term neuronal sensitization. However, only SCS attenuates spinal transmission of acute noxious inputs under neuropathic pain conditions. Our findings begin to differentiate peripheral from spinal-targeted neuromodulation therapies and may help to select the best stimulation target and optimum therapeutic intensity for pain treatment.

Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review

CONTEXT

Past evidence has shown that invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation may be effective for relieving central pain.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a topical review of the literature on brain neurostimulation techniques in patients with chronic neuropathic pain due to traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess the current evidence for their therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed using following terms: "Spinal cord injury", "Neuropathic pain", "Brain stimulation", "Deep brain stimulation" (DBS), "Motor cortex stimulation" (MCS), "Transcranial magnetic stimulation" (TMS), "Transcranial direct current stimulation" (tDCS), "Cranial electrotherapy stimulation" (CES).

RESULTS

Invasive neurostimulation therapies, in particular DBS and epidural MCS, have shown promise as treatments for neuropathic and phantom limb pain. However, the long-term efficacy of DBS is low, while MCS has a relatively higher potential with lesser complications that DBS. Among the non-invasive techniques, there is accumulating evidence that repetitive TMS can produce analgesic effects in healthy subjects undergoing laboratory-induced pain and in chronic pain conditions of various etiologies, at least partially and transiently. Another very safe technique of non-invasive brain stimulation - tDCS - applied over the sensory-motor cortex has been reported to decrease pain sensation and increase pain threshold in healthy subjects. CES has also proved to be effective in managing some types of pain, including neuropathic pain in subjects with SCI.

CONCLUSION

A number of studies have begun to use non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques therapeutically to relieve neuropathic pain and phantom phenomena in patients with SCI. However, further studies are warranted to corroborate the early findings and confirm different targets and stimulation paradigms. The utility of these protocols in combination with pharmacological approaches should also be explored.

Spinal Cord Stimulation and the Induction of c-fos and Heat Shock Protein 72 in the Central Nervous System of Rats

For more than a decade, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as an adjuvant treatment for patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapies for angina pectoris. Many studies showed that SCS has both electro-analgesic and anti-ischemic effects. Nonetheless, the biological substrates by which SCS acts have not yet been unraveled, although recently areas in the brain have been described that show changes in blood flow, following SCS, and during provocation of angina. In search of a putative mechanism of action of SCS, we hypothesized that SCS affects processing of nociceptive information within the central nervous system (CNS). Moreover, it may alter the limbic system activity that maintains the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity in the heart. Hence, we have developed a rat model to investigate its suitability for studying the induction of neural activity during SCS. To characterize neural activity, we used the expression of both the immediate early gene c-fos and the heat shock protein 72 (HSP72). c-Fos was used to identify structures in the CNS affected by SCS, and HSP72 was applied in order to ascertain whether SCS might operate as a stressor. In 20 halothane-anesthetized male Wistar rats, two electrodes were placed epidurally, one at the C7 level and the other at the T2 level. Two days after surgery, the rats were either stimulated "treated" animals, n = 10) or used as controls ("unstimulated" = "sham," n = 10) in random order. Furthermore, we studied the effect of SCS on behavior in five treated and five control rats. Three hours after stimulation, the rats were euthanized and the brain and spinal cord were removed. The treated group showed regional increased c-fos expression in regions of the limbic system (periaqueductal gray, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, paraventricular thalamic nucleus, central amygdala, agranular and dysgranular insular cortex, (peri)ambiguus, nucleus tractus solitarius, and spinal cord) that are involved in the processing of pain and cardiovascular regulation, among other things. Moreover, in both treated rats and controls, HSP72-expression was found in the endothelium of the enthorhinal cortex, the amygdala, and the ventral hypothalamus, but not in the neurons. Finally, treated animals were significantly more alert and active than controls. In conclusion, the rat model we developed appears to be suitable for studying potential mechanisms through which SCS may act. In addition, SCS affects c-fos expression in specific parts of the brain known to be involved in regulation of pain and emotions. HSP72-expression is limited to the endothelium of certain parts of the CNS and thereby excludes physical stress effects as a potential mechanism of SCS.

Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action

Chronic neuropathic pain can significantly reduce quality of life and place an economic burden on individuals and society. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an alternative approach to the treatment of neuropathic pain when standard pharmacological agents have failed. However, an improved understanding of the mechanisms by which SCS inhibits pain is needed to enhance its clinical utility. This review summarizes important findings from recent studies of SCS in animal models of neuropathic pain, highlights current understanding of the spinal neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms by which SCS produces an analgesic effect, and discusses the potential clinical applicability of these findings and future directions for research.

Peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of postamputation pain--a case report

Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in reducing postamputation pain. Electrical stimulation of the nerve innervating the painful area could reduce the pain, but peripheral nerve stimulation is rarely used to treat postamputation pain because present methods require invasive surgical access and precise placement of the leads in close proximity (≤ 2 mm) with the nerve. The present study investigated a novel approach to peripheral nerve stimulation in which a lead was placed percutaneously a remote distance (> 1 cm) away from the femoral nerve in a patient with severe residual limb pain (RLP) 33 years following a below-knee amputation. Electrical stimulation generated ≥ 75% paresthesia coverage, reduced RLP by > 60%, and improved quality of life outcomes as measured by the pain interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (100% reduction in pain interference), Pain Disability Index (74% reduction in disability), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (very much improved) during a 2-week home trial. There were no adverse events. The ability to generate significant paresthesia coverage and pain relief with a single lead inserted percutaneously and remotely from the target nerve holds promise for providing relief of postamputation pain.

Electrical stimulation at distinct peripheral sites in spinal nerve injured rats leads to different afferent activation profiles

The neurophysiological basis by which neuromodulatory techniques lead to relief of neuropathic pain remains unclear. We investigated whether electrical stimulation at different peripheral sites induces unique profiles of A-fiber afferent activation in nerve-injured rats. At 4-6weeks after subjecting rats to L5 spinal nerve injury (SNL) or sham operation, we recorded the orthodromic compound action potential (AP) at the ipsilateral L4 dorsal root in response to (1) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS, a patch electrode placed on the dorsum of the foot), (2) subcutaneous electrical stimulation (SQS, electrode inserted subcutaneously along the dorsum of the foot), (3) peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS, electrode placed longitudinally abutting the nerve), and (4) sciatic nerve stimulation (SNS). The area under the Aα/β compound AP was measured as a function of the bipolar, constant-current stimulus intensity (0.02-6.0 mA, 0.2 ms). In both nerve-injured and sham-operated groups, the stimulus-response (S-R) functions of the Aα/β compound APs differed substantially with the stimulation site; SNS having the lowest threshold and largest compound AP waveform, followed by PNS, SQS, and TENS. The S-R function to PNS was shifted to the right in the SNL group, compared to that in the sham-operated group. The Aα/β-threshold to PNS was higher in the SNL group than in the sham-operated group. The S-R functions and Aα/β-thresholds to TENS and SQS were comparable between the two groups. Electrical stimulation of different peripheral targets induced distinctive profiles of A-fiber afferent activation, suggesting that the neuronal substrates for the various forms of peripheral neuromodulatory therapies may differ.

Deep brain stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: Long-term outcome and the incidence of insertional effect

We conducted a retrospective analysis of long-term results of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Twenty-one patients had electrodes implanted in the ventrocaudalis thalamic nucleus (Vc) (n=13) or in both Vc and periaqueductal/periventricular gray matter (PAG/PVG) (n=8). After insertion of the electrodes, 9 patients (43%) had a substantial reduction in pain scores in the absence of stimulation (insertional effect). The effects of stimulation were studied right after surgery or upon return of the patients' pain after electrode insertion (stimulation trials). Patients with a greater than 50% reduction in pain scores were implanted with a pulse generator (IPG). Of interest, patients who had an insertional effect had a trend towards a successful stimulation trial (p=0.08). Overall, 13 of the 21 patients operated (62%) had a successful stimulation trial and received an IPG (12 with electrodes in Vc and one in both Vc and PAG/PVG). Seven patients (33%) did not benefit from stimulation and had the electrodes removed. One patient experienced a prolonged insertional effect and has not required stimulation. Of the 13 patients that received an IPG, 8 discontinued stimulation during the first year of treatment. Only 5 patients maintained long-term benefit (4 with stimulation in Vc and one in both Vc and PAG/PVG). The relatively low efficacy of DBS for the treatment of neuropathic pain stresses the need for further investigation and the exploration of new surgical targets.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Significantly Improves Refractory Angina Pectoris-A Local Experience

BACKGROUND

Severe refractory angina pectoris can occur in end-stage coronary artery disease despite maximal medical and revascularization therapy. Spinal cord stimulation is an under-utilized but well-established modality for the treatment of intractable angina pain.

AIM

To illustrate the practical, beneficial and effective use of spinal cord stimulation as a treatment option for refractory angina in a local context.

METHOD

A case series clinical audit of 11 patients with refractory angina treated with spinal cord stimulation over a one-year period was carried out. Baseline, three-month, six-month and two-year functional assessment data and subjective patient reports on their symptoms were evaluated.

RESULTS

Spinal cord stimulation improves six-minute walk distance, exercise duration, New York Heart Association functional class, Likert score, and number of angina free days per week for at least one year over two years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Spinal cord stimulation is an effective medium-term treatment option for refractory angina pectoris with significant benefits to functional parameters and patient symptoms. Spinal cord stimulation is an under-utilized but well-established modality for the treatment of intractable angina pain. We report a small case series clinical audit of patients who gained significant functional and symptomatic benefits from this treatment.

History of neuroaugmentative procedures

Neuroaugmentation, the use of chronic stimulation of the brain and spinal cord for pain management, developed during the past 30 years. It evolved, however, from concepts of pain treatment that were based on observations and clinical experience dating back an additional two decades or more. The appreciation of the role of the extralemniscal system and descending influences from the brain in modulation of pain perception led to the Melzack-Wall gate theory. The concept proposed in that theory, that pain perception could be lessened by increasing activity in neural structures not associated with pain, led to chronic stimulation of deep brain and spinal cord as a modality for the management of chronic pain. Both brain and spinal structures emerged as targets for neuroaugmentation.

Attenuation of neuropathic pain by segmental and supraspinal activation of the dorsal column system in awake rats

In addition to its involvement in the transmission of neuropathic pain, the dorsal column system has been shown to have analgesic effects when electrically stimulated. The segmental or supraspinal origin of the analgesia, however, has not been clearly delineated. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the contribution of supraspinal mechanisms to the inhibition of allodynia and hyperalgesia in two different rat models of mononeuropathy. Mononeuropathy was induced, under deep anesthesia, in several groups of rats (n=7 each) following either the chronic constriction injury or the spared nerve injury model. Mechanical and cold allodynia were assessed by the Von Frey monofilaments and by the acetone drop test, respectively. Thermal hyperalgesia was assessed by the paw withdrawal and hot plate tests. Bipolar electrodes for dorsal column stimulation were implanted chronically in all rats on the dorsal aspect of the medulla at the level of the obex. Selective dorsal column bilateral lesions were performed at the upper cervical level in some groups of rats. Dorsal column nuclear stimulation, rostral to selective dorsal spinal lesions, produced strong inhibitory effects on the allodynia and hyperalgesia observed in both models of mononeuropathy. These effects were comparable to those observed following similar stimulations in rats with an intact spinal cord. Our results demonstrate strong inhibitory effects of dorsal column stimulation on neuropathic pain. This inhibition can be attributed to the activation of brainstem pain-modulating centers via rostral projections of the dorsal column nuclei.

Inhibitory effects from various types of dorsal column and raphe magnus stimulations on nociceptive withdrawal flexion reflexes

Most of the clinical and research reports agree about the analgesic effects of dorsal column (DC) stimulation, but there is no unanimity about the neural mechanisms involved in this stimulation. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of segmental and rostral activation of the DCs and to investigate whether these effects are mediated through a brainstem spinal loop. Decerebrate-decerebellate cats were subjected to selective DC lesions at C(1) and C(3) spinal cervical levels and their reflex reactions to natural or electrical nociceptive stimuli were monitored either as withdrawal flexion reflexes or as motorneuronal discharges. Conditioning stimulation was performed as train of shocks (100 Hz, for 1 to 10 min or 300 Hz for 30 ms) applied on the DCs either rostral (DCr) or caudal (DCc) to the spinal lesions or on the raphe magnus (RM). Conditioning trains for 5-10 min applied on DCr inhibited the withdrawal flexion reflexes recorded as toe flexion (90% of the control). Comparisons of the effects of DCr, DCc or RM of conditioning stimuli were made on the discharges of 110 motorneurons recorded in isolated ventral root fibers. Conditioning stimulation applied to DCc produced short lived inhibition (in about 60%) or facilitation (in about 30% of the neurons) while DCr or RM conditioning produced inhibition in 90% of neurons which outlasted the duration of the conditioning trains. It was also shown that repetitive application of conditioning train on either DCr or RM resulted in longer duration of inhibition than that observed following DCc conditioning. We conclude that the stronger inhibition of motorneuronal discharges, evoked by nociceptive stimuli, is obtained by rostral activation of the DCs and that long term effects of DCst are mediated through a DC-brainstem-spinal loop.

Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to have antianginal and anti-ischemic effects in severe angina pectoris. The present study was performed to investigate whether SCS can be used as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in selected patient groups, ie, patients with no proven prognostic benefit from CABG and with an increased surgical risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred four patients were randomized (SCS, 53; CABG, 51). The patients were assessed with respect to symptoms, exercise capacity, ischemic ECG changes during exercise, rate-pressure product, mortality, and cardiovascular morbidity before and 6 months after the operation. Both groups had adequate symptom relief (P<.0001), and there was no difference between SCS and CABG. The CABG group had an increase in exercise capacity (P=.02), less ST-segment depression on maximum (P=.005) and comparable (P=.0009) workloads, and an increase in the rate-pressure product both at maximum (P=.0003) and comparable (P=.03) workloads compared with the SCS group. Eight deaths occurred during the follow-up period, 7 in the CABG group and 1 in the SCS group. On an intention-to-treat basis, the mortality rate was lower in the SCS group (P=.02). Cerebrovascular morbidity was also lower in the SCS group (P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

CABG and SCS appear to be equivalent methods in terms of symptom relief in this group of patients. Effects on ischemia, morbidity, and mortality should be considered in the choice of treatment method. Taking all factors into account, it seems reasonable to conclude that SCS may be a therapeutic alternative for patients with an increased risk of surgical complications.

Spinal cord stimulation in animal models of mononeuropathy: effects on the withdrawal response and the flexor reflex

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is efficacious for pain due to injury of peripheral nerves, and therefore models of mononeuropathy appear to be particularly suitable for an experimental approach to the study of mechanisms underlying the clinical effect of this mode of treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Virtually all previous experimental studies on SCS have utilized acute and nociceptive types of peripheral pain stimuli to explore the attenuating effects of SCS. In the present study we made use of the two models of supposedly painful neuropathy developed by Bennett and Xie (1988) and Seltzer et al. (1990) to explore the effect of SCS applied with stimulus parameters similar to those used in clinical practice. In rats subjected to ligatures of the sciatic nerve according to these two methods, SCS was applied via chronically implanted electrodes, or acutely via a laminectomy in the lower thoracic region. In awake, freely moving animals SCS produced a marked increase of the withdrawal thresholds to innocuous mechanical stimuli in the form of von Frey filaments. This threshold elevation lasted for up to 40 min after 10 min of SCS. In about one-half of the animals there was also a moderate, but short-lasting increase in the intact leg. The degree and duration of the withdrawal threshold elevation was clearly related to the intensity of SCS which was kept below the level of which a response in the thoracic or leg musculature was produced. In a second series of experiments the effect of SCS, applied acutely via a laminectomy, on the early component (latency: 8-12 msec) of the flexor reflex was studied. As a result of nerve ligation with either of the methods used, the thresholds for evoking the early as well as the late component in the nerve-ligated leg were significantly lower than in the intact one. SCS resulted in a marked and long-lasting increase of the threshold of the early component in the nerve-ligated leg. On the intact side only a slight and short-lasting increase was observed. The late, C fibre-mediated component was not influenced by SCS. The first component of the flexor reflex is conceivably mediated by A beta-fibre activation and it presumably corresponds to the withdrawal response induced by innocuous mechanical stimuli. The lack of effect of SCS on the late reflex component indicates that it selectively influences transmission of A-fibre activity. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) has been suggested to improve microcirculatory blood flow and reduce amputation rates in patients with severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Pain relief, limb salvage, and skin circulation were studied in 177 patients with ischemic pain caused by nonreconstructible PAOD who were receiving ESCS. Medical or surgical therapy had failed and vascular reconstruction was impossible in all cases. Clinical status was classified as Fontaine's stage III (chronic ischemic rest pain) in 114 patients and Fontaine's stage IV (ischemic pain and ulcers or dry gangrene) in 63 patients. PAOD was essentially due to arteriosclerosis, but 36 patients also had diabetic vascular disease. After a mean follow-up of 35.6 months, significant pain relief (> 75%) with limb salvage was achieved in 110 patients. In 11 patients with limb salvage, pain alleviation was determined to be between 50% and 70%. ESCS was ineffective in reducing pain, leading to major amputation in 56 patients. The cumulative limb salvage rate was 66% at 4 years. The systolic ankle/brachial blood pressure index did not change under stimulation. TcPO2 was assessed on the dorsum of the foot. Clinical improvement was associated with increased TcPO2, with limb salvage improving from 24.2 to 48.1 mm Hg in stage III (p < 0.02) and from 16.4 to 37.2 mm Hg in stage IV (p < 0.03) disease. A TcPO2 increase of more than 50% within the first 3 months after implantation was predictive of success. TcPO2 changes are correlated with the presence of adequate paresthesias in the painful area during the trial period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Gamma-aminobutyric acid is released in the dorsal horn by electrical spinal cord stimulation: an in vivo microdialysis study in the rat

The mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of electrical stimulation of the posterior surface of the spinal cord in chronic pain states are unknown. The prolonged pain relief following a short stimulation period is believed to imply the activation of long-lasting neurochemical processes, mainly in the spinal cord, but possibly also involving other parts of the central nervous system. Previous studies have demonstrated that substance P and serotonin are released in the cat dorsal horn during spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with electrical parameters similar to those used in the clinic. However, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) has also been hypothesized to play a role in the effect of SCS, but there have been no studies of the possible effects of SCS on GABA release. The authors applied SCS to anesthetized rats and monitored the extracellular concentration of GABA in the lumbar dorsal horns by microdialysis and a sensitive reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography technique. After 30 minutes of SCS, the GABA level increased significantly (by almost 270%) in comparison with the basal level recorded before stimulation, from 3.6 +/- 1.0 nmol/L to 13.1 +/- 2.2 nmol/L (mean +/- the standard error of the mean; P < 0.05). The peak release was delayed and appeared in the 30-minute fraction collected after stimulation. Also, perfusion of the dialysis probes with potassium (100 mmol/L) induced an increase of the GABA level. In control experiments without electrical stimulation, slowly decreasing GABA levels were observed throughout the experiments. The present results may suggest an involvement of GABA in the mechanism of SCS-induced pain relief.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Segmental effects of epidural spinal cord stimulation in humans

1. The segmental effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) were studied in twenty-four human subjects who had spinal cord stimulators implanted for the treatment of pain. The cathode was in the epidural space over the dorsum of the thoracic cord. 2. SCS generated action potentials in sensory, motor and mixed nerves which could be recorded with near-nerve electrodes. These action potentials could follow high frequencies of stimulation and appeared to be due to the antidromic activation of primary afferents in the dorsal columns. 3. Synaptic actions on single lumbosacral motoneurons were derived from peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single motor units. SCS produced a brief short-latency period of increased firing probability (PIF) in motoneurons of all of the muscles examined, probably representing monosynaptic activation. It is argued that the facilitation arises from the antidromic activation of Ia afferents in the dorsal columns. This is the probable explanation for the muscle contractions that can be induced by SCS. 4. SCS inhibited short-latency group I homonymous facilitation and reciprocal inhibition. The mechanism appears to be presynaptic to the motoneurons and may represent collision in Ia afferents, presynaptic inhibition or homosynaptic depression. 5. It was difficult to demonstrate consistent effects of SCS on reflex pathways from cutaneous afferents to flexor motoneurons because the effects of stimulation of cutaneous nerves on these motoneurons were themselves variable. 6. It is concluded that SCS applied with epidural electrodes over the dorsal cord activates primary afferents in the dorsal columns. Antidromic activation of these afferents results in strong monosynaptic facilitation of motoneurons as well as reduction in transmission in some reflex pathways to motoneurons.

Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischaemia, coronary blood flow, and myocardial oxygen consumption in angina pectoris induced by atrial pacing.

DESIGN

The heart was paced to angina during a control phase and treatment with spinal cord stimulation. Blood samples were drawn from a peripheral artery and the coronary sinus.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary pain centre, department of medicine, Ostra Hospital, and Wallenberg Research Laboratory, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Twenty patients with intractable angina pectoris, all with a spinal cord stimulator implanted before the study.

RESULTS

Spinal cord stimulation increased patients' tolerance to pacing (p < 0.001). At the pacing rate comparable to that producing angina during the control recording, myocardial lactate production during control session turned into extraction (p = 0.003) and, on the electrocardiogram, ST segment depression decreased, time to ST depression increased, and time to recovery from ST depression decreased (p = 0.01; p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). Spinal cord stimulation also reduced coronary sinus blood flow (p = 0.01) and myocardial oxygen consumption (p = 0.02). At the maximum pacing rate during treatment, all patients experienced anginal pain. Myocardial lactate extraction reverted to production (p < 0.01) and the magnitude and duration of ST segment depression increased to the same values as during control pacing, indicating that myocardial ischaemia during treatment with spinal cord stimulation gives rise to anginal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal cord stimulation has an anti-anginal and anti-ischaemic effect in severe coronary artery disease. These effects seem to be secondary to a decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption. Furthermore, myocardial ischemia during treatment gives rise to anginal pain. Thus, spinal cord stimulation does not deprive the patient of a warning signal.

An animal model for the study of brain transmittor release in response to spinal cord stimulation in the awake, freely moving rat: preliminary results from the periaqueductal grey matter

Electrical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important method in the treatment of certain chronic pain syndromes which are difficult to manage with conventional techniques. The indications for this procedure have gradually narrowed to neuropathic pain states, especially those of peripheral origin, ischaemic pain due to peripheral vascular disease, and treatment-resistant angina pectoris. In spite of the clinical use of this method for more than 20 years, the mechanisms underlying the pain alleviating effect remain largely unknown. For the effect on ischaemic pain, recent animal research indicates a mediation via autonomic pathways. Concerning the effect on neuropathic pain progress in knowledge has been scanty. Data from spinal microdialysis in decerebrated or anaesthetized animals indicate the possible importance of serotonin and substance P in the dorsal horn for pain inhibition by SCS. However, data from experiments on anaesthetized animals are, for several reasons, not likely to truely reflect the mechanisms active in conscious humans under treatment with SCS. To avoid the influence of anaesthesia and to approach the clinical situation, we have developed an animal model enabling simultaneous SCS and supraspinal microdialysis in awake, freely moving rats. The animal model is described and some preliminary data indicating a release of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) induced by SCS in the periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), are presented.

The effects of dorsal column stimulation on measures of clinical and experimental pain in man

Despite the extensive use of dorsal column stimulation (DCS) for the control of various chronic pain conditions, most clinicians report only modest success rates. Surprisingly, there has been little placebo-controlled investigation of its efficacy for altering either clinical or experimental pain perception. The current study compared the effects of DCS to placebo stimulation on clinical pain perception, perceived intensity of painful heat stimuli and visual stimuli, and the discrimination of small changes in noxious heat intensity and in light intensity. We found that DCS, but not placebo stimulation, significantly altered ratings of spontaneous clinical pain as well as those of painful cutaneous heat. In addition, heat discrimination thresholds were increased by DCS, but not placebo. On the other hand, DCS had no effect on ratings of visual stimulus intensity nor on visual discrimination, suggesting that the DCS modulation of pain perception was not due to a general change in attention. These data indicate that DCS significantly alters pain transmission in humans. Nevertheless, the relatively small reduction in clinical pain (less than 30%) must be weighed against the invasive nature of electrode implantation.

Deep brain stimulation: a review of basic research and clinical studies

Deep brain stimulation for pain control in humans was first used almost 30 years ago and has continued to receive considerable attention. Despite the large number of clinical reports describing pain relief, numerous studies have indicated that the results of these procedures vary considerably. In addition, many neurosurgeons find the procedures unpredictable, and considerable disagreement still exists regarding important issues related to the technique itself. This review gives an historical overview of the relevant basic and clinical literature and provides a critical examination of the clinical efficacy, choice of stimulation sites, parameters of stimulation, and effects on experimental pain. Finally, we give suggestions for future research that could more definitively determine the usefulness of deep brain stimulation for pain control.