Lactic dehydrogenase virus

The comparison of methods for determination of humoral and cell-mediated immunity in patients with breast cancer

We observed the immunological answer to antigens obtained from the human malignant breast tumor and from the blood of inbred mice strain C3H/H2K infected by LDH virus. We compared the modified ELISA method for humoral immunity with the leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay for cell-mediated immunity. The modified ELISA method is suitable for early diagnosing and monitoring antibodies in a malignant breast tumor simultaneously with senological examinations which include mammography and clinical examinations, because the antibodies are determined in a high number of samples by single application.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus: origin hypothesis

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome is a serious swine disease that appeared suddenly in the midwestern United States and central Europe approximately 14 years ago; the disease has now spread worldwide. In North America and Europe, the syndrome is caused by two genotypes of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), an arterivirus whose genomes diverge by approximately 40%. My hypothesis, which explains the origin and evolution of the two distinct PRRSV genotypes, is that a mutant of a closely related arterivirus of mice (lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus) infected wild boars in central Europe. These wild boars functioned as intermediate hosts and spread the virus to North Carolina in imported, infected European wild boars in 1912; the virus then evolved independently on the two continents in the prevalent wild hog populations for approximately 70 years until independently entering the domestic pig population.

Coexistence in lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus pools of variants that differ in neuropathogenicity and ability to establish a persistent infection

Neuropathogenic isolates of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) differ from nonneuropathogenic isolates in their unique ability to infect anterior horn neurons of immunosuppressed C58 and AKR mice and cause paralytic disease (age-dependent poliomyelitis [ADPM]). However, we and others have found that neuropathogenic LDVs fail to retain their neuropathogenicity during persistent infections of both ADPM-susceptible and nonsusceptible mice. On the basis of a segment in open reading frame 2 that differs about 60% between the neuropathogenic LDV-C and the nonneuropathogenic LDV-P, we have developed a reverse transcription-PCR assay that distinguishes between the genomes of the two LDVs and detects as little as 10 50% infectious doses (ID50) of LDV. With this assay, we found that LDV-P and LDV-C coexist in most available pools of LDV-C and LDV-P. For example, various plasma pools of 10(9.5) ID50 of LDV-C/ml contained about 10(5) ID50 of LDV-P/ml. Injection of such an LDV-C pool into mice of various strains resulted in the rapid displacement in the circulation of LDV-C by LDV-P as the predominant LDV, but LDV-C also persisted in the mice at a low level along with LDV-P. We have freed LDV-C of LDV-P by endpoint dilution (LDV-C-EPD). LDV-C-EPD infected mice as efficiently as did LDV-P, but its level of viremia during the persistent phase was only 1/10,000 that observed for LDV-P. LDV-permissive macrophages accumulated and supported the efficient replication of superinfecting LDV-P. Therefore, although neuropathogenic LDVs possess the unique ability to infect anterior horn neurons of ADPM-susceptible mice, they exhibit a reduced ability to establish a persistent infection in peripheral tissues of mice regardless of the strain. The specific suppression of LDV-C replication in persistently infected mice is probably due in part to a more efficient neutralization of LDV-C than LDV-P by antibodies to the primary envelope glycoprotein, VP-3P. Both neuropathogenicity and the higher sensitivity to antibody neutralization correlated with the absence of two of three N-linked polylactosaminoglycan chains on the ca. 30-amino-acid ectodomain of VP-3P, which seems to carry the neutralization epitope(s) and forms part of the virus receptor attachment site.

Lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus: an ideal persistent virus?

LDV contradicts all commonly held views about mechanisms of virus persistence, namely that persistence is primarily associated with noncytopathic viruses, or the selection of immune escape variants or other mutants, or a decrease in expression of certain viral proteins by infected cells, or replication in “immune-privileged sites”, or a general suppression of the host immune system, etc. [1, 2, 5, 54, 77, 78]. LDV is a highly cytocidal virus that invariably establishes a life-long, viremic, persistence in mice, in spite of normal anti-viral immune responses.

One secret of LDV's success in persistence is its specificity for a renewable, nonessential population of cells that is continuously regenerated, namely a subpopulation of macrophages. Since the continuous destruction of these cells is not associated with any obvious health effects, this macrophage population seems nonessential to the well-being of its host. The only function identified for this subpopulation of macrophages is clearance of the muscle type of LDH and some other enzymes [59, 67, 68]. Furthermore, the effects of LDV infection on the host immune system, namely the polyclonal activation of B cells and its associated production of autoantibodies, and the slight impairment of primary and secondary antibody responses also do not seem to be severe enough to cause any clinical consequences.

But how does LDV replication in macrophages escape all host defenses? Persistence is not dependent on the seletion of immune escape variants or other mutants ([58] and Palmer, Even and Plagemann, unpublished results). Also, LDV replication is not restricted to immune-privileged sites [5]. LDV replication persists in the liver, lymphoidal tissues and testis [66]. Only the latter could be considered a site not readily accessible to immune surveillance.

Most likely, resistance of LDV replication to antiviral immune responses is related to the unique structure of its envelope proteins and the production of large quantities of viral antigens. High titers of anti-LDV antibodies are generated in infected mice but they neutralize LDV infectivity only very inefficiently and, even though the antiviral antibodies are mainly of the IgG2a and IgG2b isotypes, they do not mediate complement lyses of virions [31]. Interaction of the antibodies and complement with the VP-3/VP-2 heterodimers in the viral envelope may be impeded by the exposure of only very short peptide segments of these proteins at the envelope surface and the presence of large oligosaccharide side chains. Furthermore, since LDV maturation is restricted to intracytoplasmic cisternae [59, 71], the question arises of whether any of the viral proteins are available on the surface of infected cells for ADCC.

CTLs also fail to control LDV replication. Altough CTLs specific for N/VP-1 are rapidly generated, these have disappeared by 30 days p.i. [26]. The reasons for this loss are unknown, but high-dose clonal exhaustion [41, 51, 77, 78] is a reasonable possibility since, regardless of the infectious dose, large amounts of LDV proteins are present in all the lymphoidal tissues at the time of the induction of the CTL response. Furthermore, after exhaustion of CTLs in the periphery, continuous replication of LDV in the thymus [65] assures that the mice become permanently immunologically tolerant with respect to LDV antigen-specific CTLs as a result of negative selection in the thymus. LDV might be a primary example for the effectiveness of a permanent clonal CTL deletion in adult animals under natural conditions of infection.

The presumed modes of transmission of LDV in nature and the events associated with its infection of mice are strikingly similar to those observed during the acute and asymptomatic phases of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [24, 29, 74, 78]. These include: (1) primary inefficient transmission via sexual and transplacental routes but effective transmission via blood; (2) primary replication in renewable populations of lymphoidal cells with production of large amounts of virus after the initial infection of the host followed by persistent low level of viremia in spite of antiviral immune responses; (3) persistence, reflecting continuous rounds of productive, cytocidal infection of permissive cells [59, 74] and the rate of generation of permissive cells which may be the main factor in determining the level of virus production (in the case of HIV, the rate of activation of CD4⁺ T cells to support a productive HIV replication might be the factor determining the rate of virus production and the progression of the disease); (4) rapid antibody formation but delayed production of neutralizing antibodies with limited neutralizing capacity; (5) rapid but transient generation of virus-specific CTLs; and (6) accumulation of large amounts of virus in newly formed germinal centers in the spleen and lymph nodes concomitant with an initiation of a permanent polyclonal activation of B cells resulting in an elevation of plasma IgG2a.

The events described under points 2–6 might be generally associated with natural viremic persistent virus infections. Such persistent viruses, by necessity, have evolved properties that allow them to escape all host defenses and control of their infection by immunological processes is, therefore, difficult, if not impossible. Prevention of infection and chemotherapy may be the only approaches available to combat such virus infections.

Comparison of the ability of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus and its virion RNA to infect murine leukemia virus-infected or -uninfected cell lines

Lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) has a strict species specificity. Cells or cell lines other than a particular subset of mouse primary macrophages which can support LDV replication in vitro have not been identified. LDV induces neurological disorders in old C58 or AKR strains, in which the involvement of multiple copies of the endogenous N-tropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV) genome and the Fv-1 locus of the mouse has been implicated. Our previous studies have demonstrated that LDV could infect and replicate in cell lines of the mouse or other species in vitro when they were infected with MuLV. The significance of and the precise mechanism underlying this phenomenon, however, remain unclear. We demonstrated in this study the efficient infection and replication of the virus in vitro by inoculation of its RNA mixed with liposome. No significant difference either in the efficiency of RNA transfection or in the ability to support its replication was observed among the various species' cell lines examined. In addition, by RNA transfection the virus replicated with equal efficiency in MuLV-infected and -uninfected cells or in macrophages derived from mice irrespective of their age. In contrast, the pattern of the infection by virus particles was quite different; LDV replication was observed only in macrophages (particularly from newborn mice) and MuLV-infected cells. By using various LDV isolates, it was demonstrated that the capability of replication between neurovirulent, LDV type C, and the other avirulent strains was almost the same in mouse cell lines when their RNA was introduced into the cells. Higher infectivity of LDV-C to MuLV-infected cells may be due to its efficient incorporation of the particles into MuLV-infected cells.

Do human T-lymphotrophic viruses (HTLVs) and other enveloped viruses induce autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis?

A virally induced autoimmune reaction may be important in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. The role that glycolipids and myelin basic protein presented to the virus may play in this process is considered. The most likely cells to be the source of autoantigens are neurons, myelin and oligodendrocytes. Viral infection of class II-expressing cells and association of the viral envelope autoantigens and the class II molecules could trigger an autoimmune reaction. It is suggested that for MS to develop following a virus infection the virus will need to cause expression of class II antigens on brain cells as well as fulfill the same role as an antigen presenting cell. The part which T-lymphotrophic viruses (HTLVs) and other enveloped viruses may play in this phenomenon is discussed.

Effects of tumor growth on host defenses

Monocytes and macrophages play an important role in host defense against neoplasia. Studies from our and other laboratories have demonstrated that patients with a variety of cancers have a defect in monocyte chemotactic responses. Tumor-bearing mice are also inhibited in their ability to accumulate macrophages to inflammatory foci. We have shown that extracts prepared from murine tumors, as well as the plasma and urine of tumor-bearing mice, contain anti-inflammatory proteins which are antigenically and physicochemically related to the immunosuppressive retroviral envelope protein p15E. Similarly, proteins capable of inhibiting monocyte chemotactic responses are present in human cancerous effusions and can be specifically absorbed by monoclonal antibodies to p15E. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that human malignant and mitogen-transformed cells contain p15E-related antigens. These findings led us to propose a two stage model of tumorigenesis: the first stage involves neoplastic transformation of a cell while the second stage involves activation of a gene coding for a p15E-like protein which allows the transformed cell to escape immune surveillance and go on to become a tumor. Support for this model has come from recent studies which have identified within the human genome an endogenous retrovirus sequence whose envelope gene is partially homologous to a highly conserved region of p15E. Using a synthetic peptide, termed CKS-17, we have shown that this region may be responsible for many of the biological activities of p15E and is capable of suppressing lymphocyte and natural killer cell immune functions as well as those of monocytes and macrophages. Thus tumors may be capable of evading host defense mechanisms by activation of a normal gene related to the immunosuppressive retroviral protein p15E.

Suppression of macrophage oxidative metabolism by products of malignant and nonmalignant cells

Each of 11 tumors tested produced a factor that markedly suppressed the ability of macrophages to release H2O2 or O.2- in response to phorbol myristate acetate or zymosan. Four of seven normal cell types produced a similar activity, which was 3.5-7 times lower in titer than that in tumor cell-conditioned medium (TCM), and which was much more rapidly reversible in its effects. TCM caused 50% inhibition of H2O2 release when it was present in the medium for 48 h at a concentration of 13%, or when 100% TCM was present in the medium for 18 h. The H2O2-releasing capacity of macrophages incubated in TCM only returned to control levels by 6 d after its removal. TCM prevented augmentation of H2O2-releasing capacity by lymphokines. The titer of suppressive activity in TCM depended on both the concentration of tumor cells and the duration of their incubation. TCM did not augment the activity of catalase, myeloperoxidase, glutathione peroxidase, or glutathione reductase or the content of glutathione within macrophages, suggesting that decreased synthesis rather than increased catabolism was responsible for reduced secretion of H2O2. Suppression of the release of H2O2 or O.2- by TCM appeared to be a relatively specific effect, in that TCM increased macrophage spreading and adherence to glass while exerting little influence on rates of phagocytosis, synthesis of protein, or secretion of lysozyme, plasminogen activator, or arachidonic acid and its metabolites. Thus, tumor cells and some normal cells can secrete a factor that selectively deactivates macrophage oxidative metabolism.

Identification of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus as the etiological agent of genetically restricted, age-dependent polioencephalomyelitis of mice

The etiological agent of genetically restricted, age-dependent polioencephalomyelitis of mice (the ADPE agent) and several isolates of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) were compared by biological, physical-chemical and antigenic criteria. The data indicate that the ADPE agent is a strain of LDV. Like LDV, the ADPE agent induced a selective elevation of plasma enzymes and splenomegaly in mice. The enzyme-elevating activity and the paralytogenic activity of the ADPE agent preparations were shown to belong to the same virus. The ADPE agent demonstrated LDV-like replication kinetics in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, the ADPE agent required primary mouse macrophages for in vitro replication, as does LDV. In turn, the LDV isolates induced a paralytic disease with ADPE-like lesions in the spinal cords of immunosuppressed C58 mice. However, the LDV isolates showed a stronger dependence on strain and age of mouse for the induction of paralysis than did the ADPE agent. The LDV isolates and the ADPE agent exhibited indistinguishable morphologies, buoyant densities, structural protein patterns, and virion ribonucleic acid sedimentation rates. Furthermore, they displayed strong antigenic cross-reactivity, as determined by cross-protection in vivo and by radioimmunoassay.