Intraoperative monitoring of the electrocochleogram and the preservation of hearing during acoustic neuroma excision

Intra-operative hearing monitoring methods in middle ear surgeries

Hearing loss is a condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Conductive hearing loss (CHL) is mainly caused by middle ear diseases. The low frequency area is the pivotal part of speech frequencies and most frequently impaired in patients with CHL. Among various treatments of CHL, middle ear surgery is efficient to improve hearing. However, variable success rates and possible needs for prolonged revision surgery still frustrate both surgeons and patients. Nowadays, increasing numbers of researchers explore various methods to monitor the efficacy of ossicular reconstruction intraoperatively, including electrocochleography (ECochG), auditory brainstem response (ABR), auditory steady state response (ASSR), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), subjective whisper test, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Here, we illustrate several methods used clinically by reviewing the literature.

Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function

Object

Recording the auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a common method for monitoring the integrity of auditory pathways during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle. Electrocochleography (ECochG) is an alternative means of intraoperative neuromonitoring. In the present study the authors compared the practicability and prognostic significance of these two methods by performing simultaneous recordings in the operating room.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2011, 125 patients (mean age 55 years) underwent surgery in the cerebellopontine angle. Seventy-one percent of the patients presented with a hearing deficit, and 37% had useful hearing but with slight functional impairment. Auditory brainstem response was recorded with a subdermal needle electrode at the mastoid. For ECochG recording, a noninvasive ball electrode was attached to the tympanic membrane. Amplitudes obtained from both ECochG and ABR audiometry were compared and correlated to pre- and postoperative hearing deficits.

Results

Simultaneous intraoperative monitoring via ABR and ECochG was possible in 114 cases (91%). Postoperatively, 42% of patients showed some degree of new hearing deficit, whereas 4% had improvement. The mean amplitudes in ECochG monitoring were significantly higher (0.18 ± 0.04 μV) than the ABR potentials (0.08 ± 0.006 μV; p < 0.05). All waves recorded at the mastoid needle electrode could be recognized in the potentials of the tympanic ball electrode. Hearing outcome correlated more reliably with the relative amplitude changes in Waves III and V in ECochG (III: p = 0.0008, V: p = 0.0015) than in ABR monitoring (III: p = 0.2075, V: p = 0.0398).

Conclusions

Intraoperative monitoring of the auditory system by recording with noninvasive tympanic ball electrodes is more practicable than with subcutaneous needle electrodes at the tragus. Since there is also a reliable correlation between ECochG and clinical outcome, the method can replace common ABR recording during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle.

Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery

Acoustic neuromas (AN) are benign tumors that arise from the vestibular nerve within the internal auditory canal, where hearing loss is the most common symptom. This retrospective study was done to determine the results of hearing preservation in patients operated for AN at the University of Minnesota, as well as the factors affecting them. One hundred-eighty patients with AN were operated between 1988 and 1998, of whom 91 (50.5%) underwent hearing preservation surgery by either the middle fossa (MF) or the suboccipital (SO) approach. Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone averages (1, 2, and 4 K), speech discrimination scores (SDS), and acoustic reflex thresholds (ART) were noted and classified according to the Shelton's and the Gardner's classifications. The overall rate of hearing preservation was 23.1%. The outcome of hearing results was better with the MF approach compared with the SO approach. Small tumor size and better preoperative hearing levels favored a better postoperative hearing result. The rate of hearing improvement over time was better for the MF patients. Patients for whom intraoperative auditory monitoring was performed seemed to have better hearing outcomes.

Correlation between auditory function and internal auditory canal pressure in patients with vestibular schwannomas

OBJECT

Hearing loss is the most common presenting symptom in patients who harbor a vestibular schwannoma (VS). Although mechanical injury to the cochlear nerve and vascular compromise of the auditory apparatus have been proposed, the exact mechanism of this hearing loss remains unclear. To test whether pressure on the cochlear nerve from tumor growth in the internal auditory canal (IAC) is responsible for this clinical finding, the authors prospectively evaluated intracanalicular pressure (ICaP) in patients with VS and correlated this with preoperative brainstem response.

METHODS

In 40 consecutive patients undergoing a retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach for tumor excision, ICaP was measured by inserting a pressure microsensor into the IAC before any tumor manipulation. Pressure recordings were correlated with tumor size and preoperative auditory evoked potential (AEP) recordings. The ICaP, which varied widely among patients (range 0-45 mm Hg), was significantly elevated in most patients (median 16 mm Hg). Although these pressure measurements directly correlated to the extension of tumor into the IAC (p = 0.001), they did not correlate to total tumor size (p = 0.2). In 20 patients in whom baseline AEP recordings were available, the ICaP directly correlated to wave V latency (p = 0.0001), suggesting that pressure from tumor growth in the IAC may be responsible for hearing loss in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor growth into the IAC results in elevation of ICaP and may play a role in hearing loss in patients with VS. The relevance of these findings to the surgical treatment of these tumors is discussed.

Intraoperative monitoring during surgery for acoustic neuroma: benefits of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode

OBJECTIVES

To assess the utility of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode for intraoperative monitoring during acoustic neuroma and other cerebellopontine angle tumour surgery and to define the neurophysiological and surgical factors which influence hearing preservation.

METHODS

Twenty two patients, 18 with acoustic neuromas and four with other cerebellopontine angle tumours, underwent intraoperative monitoring during tumour excision. The extratympanic intrameatal electrode (IME) was used to record the electrocochleogram (ECoG) and surface electrodes to record the brainstem auditory evoked response (ABR).

RESULTS

The compound action potential (CAP) of the ECoG was two and a half times greater in amplitude than wave I of the ABR and was easily monitored. Virtually instant information was available as minimal averaging was required. Continuous monitoring was possible from the commencement of anaesthesia to skin closure. The IME was easy to place, non-invasive, and did not interfere with the operative field. Operative procedures which affected CAP or wave V latency or amplitude were drilling around the internal auditory meatus, tumour dissection, nerve section, and brainstem and cerebellar retraction. Hearing was achieved in 59% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The IME had significant benefits in comparison with other methods of monitoring. The technique provided information beneficial to preservation of hearing.

Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): hearing function in 1000 tumor resections

OBJECTIVE

The realistic chances of hearing preservation and the comparability of international results on hearing preservation in complete microsurgical vestibular schwannoma resections were the focus of this study in a large patient population treated by uniform principles.

METHODS

One thousand vestibular schwannomas were operated on at Nordstadt Neurosurgical Department, from 1978 to 1993, by the senior surgeon (MS). There were 1000 tumors in 962 patients, i.e., 880 patients with unilateral tumors and 82 patients operated on for bilateral tumors in neurofibromatosis-2 (120 cases). Preservation of the cochlear nerve was attempted whenever possible. The audiometric data were analyzed by the Nordstadt classification system and graded in steps of 30 dB by audiometry and in steps of 10 to 30% by speech discrimination; for comparability, the data were also evaluated by the criteria of Gardner, Shelton, and House, and they were assessed in relation to the Hannover tumor extension grading system.

RESULTS

Anatomic cochlear nerve preservation was achieved in 682 of 1000 cases (68%), as well as in some preoperatively deaf patients, a very few of whom regained some hearing. Of a total of 732 cases with some preoperative hearing, anatomic cochlear nerve preservation was achieved in 580 cases (79%) and functional cochlear nerve preservation in 289 (39.5%); analysis over time revealed an actual preservation rate of 47% in the most recent 200 cases. Specific factors, such as gender, tumor extension, preoperative hearing quality, and symptom duration, were investigated for their predictive value for hearing preservation. Male gender, small to medium tumor size (mainly extending within the cerebellopontine cistern; Classes T2 and T3), good to moderate hearing (up to 40-dB loss), and short duration of hypoacusis (< 1.5 yr) or of vestibular disturbances (< 0.7 yr) were advantageous factors, with chances of hearing preservation between 47 and 88%.

CONCLUSION

Functional cochlear nerve preservation in complete microsurgical resection should belong to the contemporary standard of treatment goals.

Influence of blood supply, thermal and mechanical traumata on hearing function in an animal model

Even with modern neurosurgical techniques preservation of functional hearing in acoustic neurinoma surgery is still impossible in a large number of cases. Due to the necessity of averaging the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) this monitoring is not a real time measurement. Therefore the surgeon cannot be sure which manipulation during the tumour dissection has caused the loss of the BAEPs. The direct monitoring of the cochlear nerve (CNAP) may warn the surgeon earlier. But it is not able to explain, which manipulation has caused the worsening of the potentials. A loss of the waves after coagulation of a vessel next to the cochlear nerve may be the result of the heat or of the disturbance of the blood supply. Potentially harmful to cochlear nerve function may be the interruption of inner ear blood supply, thermal or mechanical traumata. Experimental studies are rare to nonexistent. We therefore tested selectively each trauma for its influence on the BAEPs in an animal model. In New Zealand rabbits a lateral craniectomy of the posterior fossa was performed. Care was taken not to retract the cerebellum or to open the inner ear system, because both factors might disturb the BAEPs. Each step of the operation was followed by BAEP recording. After reaching the internal auditory canal, the cerebellopontine angle of 6 animals was exposed to heated water with definitive increasing temperature. The BAEPs did not react significantly until 71 degrees C was reached and protein coagulation started. In the second group, the internal auditory artery of 6 rabbits was compressed with a microdissector for 3 minutes. Subsequently the BAEPs disappeared in all animals. In the last group a constant pressure of 10 g was applied to 6 cochlear nerves for 1 minute consistently causing the loss of the BAEPs. The results are statistically significant (p = 0.03). We therefore concluded that the blood supply of the inner ear is of the upmost importance for cochlear nerve function. Mechanical manipulation should be minimized whereas thermal traumatization of the nerve is only critical when the nerve itself is coagulated.

Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery

Hearing conservation in acoustic tumour surgery remains controversial. There have been few previous reports in the British literature. The senior author has managed 24 patients by retrosigmoid surgery with the intention of preserving hearing during the last 9 years. The clinical features, surgical technique and results are discussed with respect to pre-operative selection criteria, and post-operative quality of hearing. Hearing preservation has been achieved in 11 (78.6%) of 14 patients with small or intracanalicular tumours and a mean minimum auditory threshold of 35 dB and 70% speech discrimination, the majority (81.8%) above the 50 dB/50% level. Tumour filing the fundus of the internal auditory canal was found to be a significant adverse prognostic factor as regards successful hearing preservation. Tumour excision was complete in all patients. Nearly 90% of patients had normal facial function, and the remaining 10% grade II function. Associated morbidity was minimal. It is suggested that the potential for hearing conservation should be considered as a factor in the management of patients with small acoustic neuromas.