1
|
Pigorini A, Avanzini P, Barborica A, Bénar CG, David O, Farisco M, Keller CJ, Manfridi A, Mikulan E, Paulk AC, Roehri N, Subramanian A, Vulliémoz S, Zelmann R. Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 408:110160. [PMID: 38734149 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Simultaneous noninvasive and invasive electrophysiological recordings provide a unique opportunity to achieve a comprehensive understanding of human brain activity, much like a Rosetta stone for human neuroscience. In this review we focus on the increasingly-used powerful combination of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) with scalp electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG). We first provide practical insight on how to achieve these technically challenging recordings. We then provide examples from clinical research on how simultaneous recordings are advancing our understanding of epilepsy. This is followed by the illustration of how human neuroscience and methodological advances could benefit from these simultaneous recordings. We conclude with a call for open data sharing and collaboration, while ensuring neuroethical approaches and argue that only with a true collaborative approach the promises of simultaneous recordings will be fulfilled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pigorini
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; UOC Maxillo-facial Surgery and dentistry, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Avanzini
- Institute of Neuroscience, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Christian-G Bénar
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, U1106, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Olivier David
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, U1106, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Michele Farisco
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 256, Uppsala, SE 751 05, Sweden; Science and Society Unit Biogem, Biology and Molecular Genetics Institute, Via Camporeale snc, Ariano Irpino, AV 83031, Italy
| | - Corey J Keller
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, CA 94394, USA
| | - Alfredo Manfridi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ezequiel Mikulan
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelique C Paulk
- Department of Neurology and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas Roehri
- EEG and Epilepsy Unit, Dpt of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ajay Subramanian
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, CA 94394, USA
| | - Serge Vulliémoz
- EEG and Epilepsy Unit, Dpt of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rina Zelmann
- Department of Neurology and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Craniofacial Surgery: Review and Grading of the Current Literature. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30:465-472. [PMID: 30640846 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000005130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Image-guided navigation has existed for nearly 3 decades, but its adoption to craniofacial surgery has been slow. A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the current status of navigation in craniofacial surgery. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) systematic review of the Medline and Web of Science databases was performed using a series of search terms related to Image-Guided Navigation and Craniofacial Surgery. Titles were then filtered for relevance and abstracts were reviewed for content. Single case reports were excluded as were animal, cadaver, and virtual data. Studies were categorized based on the type of study performed and graded using the Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales, when appropriate. RESULTS A total of 2030 titles were returned by our search criteria. Of these, 518 abstracts were reviewed, 208 full papers were evaluated, and 104 manuscripts were ultimately included in the study. A single randomized controlled trial was identified (Jadad score 3), and 12 studies were identified as being case control or case cohort studies (Average Newcastle-Ottawa score 6.8) The most common application of intraoperative surgical navigation cited was orbital surgery (n = 36), followed by maxillary surgery (n = 19). Higher quality studies more commonly pertained to the orbit (6/13), and consistently show improved results. CONCLUSION Image guided surgical navigation improves outcomes in orbital reconstruction. Although image guided navigation has promise in many aspects of craniofacial surgery, current literature is lacking and future studies addressing this paucity of data are needed before universal adoption can be recommended.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosenow JM, Sootsman WK. Application accuracy of an electromagnetic field-based image-guided navigation system. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2006; 85:75-81. [PMID: 17167235 DOI: 10.1159/000097922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We tested the application accuracy of an electromagnetic field-based image guidance system to compare it to traditional optically tracked systems. METHODS A plastic skull phantom was fitted with fiducial markers rigidly attached via self-drilling bone screws. Volumetric CT scan was obtained to simulate the clinical condition. A metal disc marked in 1-mm increments was placed at the expected target point. Following registration and alignment of a trajectory guide, radial and depth localization errors were measured after both freehand and stabilized approaches on both the right and left sides. Statistical analyses of the localization errors were performed. RESULTS Total target localization error ranged from 0.71 to 3.51 mm with a mean +/- SEM of 2.13 +/- 0.11 mm. The radial error averaged 0.98 +/- 0.11 mm, depth error 1.74 +/- 0.13 mm. The freehand procedures produced a statistically greater radial, depth and total error than the fixed procedures. CONCLUSIONS Accuracy of image-guided localization using an electromagnetic field guidance system is similar to that reported for optically guided systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Rosenow
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Willems PWA, van der Sprenkel JWB, Tulleken CAF, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJB. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol 2006; 253:1123-36. [PMID: 16988793 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0158-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2005] [Accepted: 10/21/2005] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Approximately four decades after the successful clinical introduction of framebased stereotactic neurosurgery by Spiegel and Wycis, frameless stereotaxy emerged to enable more elaborate image guidance in open neurosurgical procedures. Frameless stereotaxy, or neuronavigation, relies on one of several different localizing techniques to determine the position of an operative instrument relative to the surgical field, without the need for a coordinate frame rigidly fixed to the patients' skull. Currently, most systems are based on the optical triangulation of infrared light sources fixed to the surgical instrument. In its essence, a navigation system is a three-dimensional digitiser that correlates its measurements to a reference data set, i.e. a preoperatively acquired CT or MRI image stack. This correlation is achieved through a patient-to-image registration procedure resulting in a mathematical transformation matrix mapping each position in 'world space' onto 'image space'. Thus, throughout the remainder of the surgical procedure, the position of the surgical instrument can be demonstrated on a computer screen, relative to the CT or MRI images. Though neuronavigation has become a routinely used addition to the neurosurgical armamentarium, its impact on surgical results has not yet been examined sufficiently. Therefore, the surgeon is left to decide on a case-by-case basis whether to perform surgery with or without neuronavigation. Future challenges lie in improvement of the interface between the surgeon and the neuronavigator and in reducing the brainshift error, i.e. inaccuracy introduced by changes in tissue positions after image acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W A Willems
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, CX, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mascott CR. Comparison of magnetic tracking and optical tracking by simultaneous use of two independent frameless stereotactic systems. Neurosurgery 2006; 57:295-301; discussion 295-301. [PMID: 16234678 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000176411.55324.1e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to compare the calculated accuracy and the true surgical accuracy of a magnetic and an optical tracking system at surgical registration and during surgery. METHODS Two Food and Drug Administration-approved, commercially available frameless stereotactic systems were used simultaneously in 70 surgical cases. The Compass Cygnus-PFS system (Compass International, Rochester MN) uses magnetic field referencing and tracking. The StealthStation (Medtronic SNT, Louisville, CO) uses optical referencing and tracking. Registration was performed for each of the systems using adhesive fiducial markers, cranial-implanted markers, anatomic landmarks, or a combination thereof. Preoperative imaging consisted of volumetric computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both. Calculated accuracy was given by each of the systems as the root mean square after registration. Surgical accuracy was assessed by comparing the anatomic accuracy of each system with a number of recognizable intraoperative anatomic landmarks. RESULTS Calculated accuracy (root mean square) was 1.4 +/- 0.6 mm using the magnetic system and 1.4 +/- 0.8 mm using the optical tracking system. In the 42 patients with implanted cranial fiducials, the calculated accuracies were 1.0 +/- 0.5 mm (magnetic) and 0.9 +/- 0.4 mm (optical). True surgical accuracy was considered good (3 mm or less) in both systems in 60 of 70 patients. In two patients, neither system was accurate. In eight patients, one of the two systems was considered inaccurate. Of these, the magnetic system was considered inaccurate three times and the optical system five times. CONCLUSION Magnetic referencing and tracking was found to be comparable with optical tracking both with regard to calculated and true surgical accuracy. Interference from metal objects in the magnetic field was seen rarely.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nathoo N, Cavuşoğlu MC, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH. In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery 2005; 56:421-33; discussion 421-33. [PMID: 15730567 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000153929.68024.cf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2004] [Accepted: 12/09/2004] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of multiple front-end technologies during the past quarter century has generated an emerging futurism for the discipline of neurological surgery. Driven primarily by synergistic developments in science and engineering, neurosurgery has always managed to harness the potential of the latest technical developments. Robotics represents one such technology. Progress in development of this technology has resulted in new uses for robotic devices in our discipline, which are accompanied by new potential dangers and inherent risks. The recent surge in robot-assisted interventions in other disciplines suggests that this technology may be considered one of a spectrum of frontier technologies poised to fuel the development of neurosurgery and consolidate the era of minimalism. On a more practical level, if the introduction of robotics in neurosurgery proves beneficial, neurosurgeons will need to become facile with this technology and learn to harness its potential so that the best surgical results may be achieved in the least invasive manner. This article reviews the role of robotic technology in the context of neurosurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra Nathoo
- Brain Tumor Institute and Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningiomas are biologically complex and clinically and surgically challenging. These features, combined with the rewarding potential for cure, make them of great interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neuroscientists alike. REVIEW SUMMARY Initially, we review the clinical context of meningiomas, particularly recent changes in histopathological classification, diagnosis, and neuroimaging. Secondly, the underlying basic science as it has evolved over the last decades is summarized. The status of areas recently of intense interest, such as steroid hormone receptors and oncogenic viruses is described. Additionally, emerging areas of great promise, such as cytogenetics and molecular biology are presented. Lastly, we describe recent advances in management. In particular, skull-base surgery, image-guided surgery, and advances in radiotherapy are emphasized. The possible impact of basic research on management and outcome is also outlined. CONCLUSIONS Although usually benign and amenable to cure, meningiomas still present significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. Advances in basic science, surgery, and adjuvant therapy are widening the potential for safe, effective, evidence-based management leading to even better outcomes
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J Drummond
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Ultimately, neurosurgery performed via a robotic interface will serve to improve the standard of a neurosurgeon's skills, thus making a good surgeon a better surgeon. In fact, computer and robotic instrumentation will become allies to the neurosurgeon through the use of these technologies in training, diagnostic, and surgical events. Nonetheless, these technologies are still in an early stage of development, and each device developed will entail its own set of challenges and limitations for use in clinical settings. The future operating room should be regarded as an integrated information system incorporating robotic surgical navigators and telecontrolled micromanipulators, with the capabilities of all principal neurosurgical concepts, sharing information, and under the control of a single person, the neurosurgeon. The eventual integration of robotic technology into mainstream clinical neurosurgery offers the promise of a future of safer, more accurate, and less invasive surgery that will result in improved patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra Nathoo
- Brain Tumor Institute and Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grunert P, Darabi K, Espinosa J, Filippi R. Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 2003; 26:73-99; discussion 100-1. [PMID: 12962294 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-003-0262-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The article comprises three main parts: a historical review on navigation, the mathematical basics for calculation and the clinical applications of navigation devices. Main historical steps are described from the first idea till the realisation of the frame-based and frameless navigation devices including robots. In particular the idea of robots can be traced back to the Iliad of Homer, the first testimony of European literature over 2500 years ago. In the second part the mathematical calculation of the mapping between the navigation and the image space is demonstrated, including different registration modalities and error estimations. The error of the navigation has to be divided into the technical error of the device calculating its own position in space, the registration error due to inaccuracies in the calculation of the transformation matrix between the navigation and the image space, and the application error caused additionally by anatomical shift of the brain structures during operation. In the third part the main clinical fields of application in modern neurosurgery are demonstrated, such as localisation of small intracranial lesions, skull-base surgery, intracerebral biopsies, intracranial endoscopy, functional neurosurgery and spinal navigation. At the end of the article some possible objections to navigation-aided surgery are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Grunert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hassfeld S, Mühling J. Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery--a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30:2-13. [PMID: 11289616 DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Advances in the basic scientific research within the field of computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery have enabled us to introduce features of these techniques into routine clinical practice. In order to simulate complex surgery with the aid of a computer, the diagnostic image data and especially various imaging modalities including computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound (US) must be arranged in relation to each other, thus enabling a rapid switching between the various modalities as well as the viewing of superimposed images. Segmenting techniques for the reconstruction of three-dimensional representations of soft and hard tissues are required. We must develop ergonomic and user friendly interactive methods for the surgeon, thus allowing for a precise and fast entry of the planned surgical procedure in the planning and simulation phase. During the surgical phase, instrument navigation tools offer the surgeon interactive support through operation guidance and control of potential dangers. This feature is already available today and within this article we present a review of the development of this rapidly evolving technique. Future intraoperative assistance takes the form of such passive tools for the support of intraoperative orientation as well as so-called 'tracking systems' (semi-active systems) which accompany and support the surgeons' work. The final form are robots which execute specific steps completely autonomously. The techniques of virtual reality and computer assisted surgery are increasingly important in their medical applications. Many applications are still being developed or are still in the form of a prototype. It is already clear, however, that developments in this area will have a considerable effect on a surgeon's routine work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hassfeld
- Department of Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schroeder HW, Wagner W, Tschiltschke W, Gaab MR. Frameless neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 2001; 94:72-9. [PMID: 11147902 DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.1.0072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Frameless computerized neuronavigation has been increasingly used in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. However, clear indications for the application of neuronavigation in neuroendoscopy have not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine in which intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures frameless neuronavigation is necessary and really beneficial compared with a free-hand endoscopic approach. METHODS A frameless infrared-based computerized neuronavigation system was used in 44 patients who underwent intracranial endoscopic procedures, including 13 third ventriculostomies, nine aqueductoplasties, eight intraventricular tumor biopsy procedures or resections, six cystocistemostomies in arachnoid cysts, five colloid cyst removals, four septostomies in multiloculated hydrocephalus, four cystoventriculostomies in intraparenchymal cysts, two aqueductal stent placements, and fenestration of one pineal cyst and one cavum veli interpositi. All interventions were successfully accomplished. In all procedures, the navigational system guided the surgeons precisely to the target. Navigational tracking was helpful in entering small ventricles, in approaching the posterior third ventricle when the foramen of Monro was narrow, and in selecting the best approach to colloid cysts. Neuronavigation was essential in some cystic lesions lacking clear landmarks, such as intraparenchymal cysts or multiloculated hydrocephalus. Neuronavigation was not necessary in standard third ventriculostomies, tumor biopsy procedures, and large sylvian arachnoid cysts, or for approaching the posterior third ventricle when the foramen of Monro was enlarged. CONCLUSIONS Frameless neuronavigation has proven to be accurate, reliable, and extremely useful in selected intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures. Image-guided neuroendoscopy improved the accuracy of the endoscopic approach and minimized brain trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H W Schroeder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barnett GH. The role of image-guided technology in the surgical planning and resection of gliomas. J Neurooncol 1999; 42:247-58. [PMID: 10433108 DOI: 10.1023/a:1006138609201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Today's image-guided techniques provide the surgeon with new tools to plan and execute surgery on gliomas. When coupled with good judgment, they can extend what is safely operable and may maximize the extent of surgical resection. Intraoperative imaging such as ultrasonography or MRI may expand the utility of these systems in the foreseeable future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G H Barnett
- The Neuro-oncology and Brain Tumor Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rousseau J, Costi E, Gibon D. [Stereotactic localization in medical imaging. Technical and methodologic aspects]. Cancer Radiother 1998; 2:146-59. [PMID: 9749109 DOI: 10.1016/s1278-3218(98)89085-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic neurosurgery and stereotactic radiation therapy require the three-dimensional localization of lesions for biopsy or for treatment planning. The aim of this paper is the description of methods used in the different imaging modalities: x-ray teleradiography, digital subtracted angiography, computed tomography, and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. The simple pin-target locating techniques are distinguished from those serving to the definition of volumes target necessary to treatment planning. Performances and difficulties of these techniques are emphasized. The specific methodology developed in Lille is described as an example. Organizational aspects and necessary quality controls for a good progress of the entire procedure, from imaging to treatment, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Rousseau
- Institut de technologie médicale, Pavillon Vancostenobel, CHRU de Lille, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|