Prevention, diagnosis and services

The utilisation of primary health care system concepts positively impacts the assistance of patients with rare diseases despite limited knowledge and experience by health care professionals: A qualitative synopsis of the evidence including approximately 78 000 individuals

Background

Individuals with rare diseases (RD) have been historically understudied. Previous publications reported that existing primary health care (PHC) workforces and associated infrastructure had been shown to improve their access and health-related outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). As current evidence about the impact of PHC on patients diagnosed with RD is yet highly dispersed, this scoping review aimed to collate available evidence of the impact of PHC on patients with RD and summarize published information from multiple stakeholders about the perceived usefulness and barriers to effective use of the PHC system.

Methods

We searched Embase, Health System Evidence, PubMed, LILACS / BVS, and The Cochrane Library, from inception to September 1, 2022, for publications providing clear expert- or experience-based insights or data from patients living with RD at the PHC level of care. We included publications highlighting barriers to integrated care of patients with RD, reported by multiple social actors involved in caring for patients with RD. Two investigators screened publications, extracted data, and clustered information among records deemed eligible for inclusion. Data synthesis was performed using narrative and thematic-based analysis. Major findings identified and coded through a semantic-driven analysis were processed in vosViewer software and reported using descriptive statistics.

Findings

Eighty publications were included in this review. Quali-quantitative analyses evidenced that the PHC level is essential for approaching patients with RD, mainly due to its longitudinal, multidisciplinary, and coordinated care delivery. In addition, several publications highlighted that the medical curriculum is inappropriate for preparing health care providers to deal with patients presenting unusual signs and symptoms and being diagnosed with RD. PHC teams are essential in orienting patients and families on emergency events. Technology-related concepts were reported in 19 publications, emphasizing their effectiveness on early diagnosis, optimal treatment definition, improvement of quality of life, and long-lasting follow-up.

Conclusions

We provided valuable information on the effectiveness of the PHC in fostering a creative, integrative, and supportive environment for patients living with RD. Our results can be helpful to several stakeholders in deciding what actions are still pending to achieve a solid and positive experience for patients with RD in the PHC.

Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022332347).

Congenital Anomalies: Cluster Detection and Investigation

This work summarizes the main aspects to be considered around birth defects (or congenital anomalies) clusters. Most birth defects (BD), considered individually, fall into the definition of rare diseases (RD), according to their low frequency. Likewise, many RD are congenital, because their manifestations are present at birth or can be even evident before the delivery. It has been estimated that overall 7.9 million children are born each year with serious BD of genetic or partially genetic origin, and additional hundreds of thousands more are born with serious BD of post-conception origin.A "birth defect cluster" can be defined as an unusual aggregation of cases (grouped in place and time) that is suspected to be greater than expected, even though the expected number may not be known. These clusters are incidents or occurrences that let us turn the challenge of identifying the causal agent(s) involved in the origin of such clusters, into an opportunity to exert primary prevention, and thus achieve the ultimate goal of enabling infants being born healthy. Therefore, any program or system involved in BD surveillance and research should devote part of its activities to detect and investigate clusters, to ensure that such opportunity for primary prevention will be conveniently leveraged. Regardless the type of cluster, there are several phases that must be undertaken sequentially for proper control and the maximum benefit for the population: cluster detection, evaluation and investigation, management, adoption of preventive measures, and communication of the results to the public or target population.