Global Introduction of a Low-Cost Contraceptive Implant

Promoting long-acting reversible contraception among post-abortion clients with a provider-comparison intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Nepal

BACKGROUND

Although long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is more effective and longer lasting than short-acting methods, uptake remains low among post-abortion clients. Using a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, we evaluate the impact of a provider-level peer-comparison intervention to encourage choice of LARC in Nepal among post-abortion clients.

METHODS

The intervention used prominently displayed monthly posters comparing the health clinic's previous month performance on LARC uptake against peer clinics. To understand how the intervention affected behavior, while ensuring voluntarism and informed choice, we used mystery client visits, in-depth provider interviews, and client exit survey data. The trial examined 17,680 post-abortion clients in 36 clinics in Nepal from July 2016 to January 2017. The primary outcome was the proportion of clients receiving LARCs. Statistical analysis used ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with ANCOVA estimation to assess the intervention's impact on LARC uptake while controlling for client- and clinic-level characteristics.

RESULTS

The intervention increased LARC use among post-abortion clients by 6.6% points [95% CI: 0.85 to 12.3, p-value < 0.05], a 29.5% increase in LARC use compared to control clinics. This effect persisted after the formal experiment ended. Analysis of provider and client experiences showed that the behavioral intervention generated significant change in providers' counseling practices, motivated the sharing of best practices. Quality of care indicators either remained stable or improved.

CONCLUSION

We find that a provider-level behavioral intervention increases LARC uptake among post-abortion clients. This type of intervention represents a low-cost option to contribute to reducing unmet need for contraception through provider behavior change.

Prevalence of contraceptive implant discontinuation among women who used implant in Ethiopia: Systemic review and meta-analysis

The likelihood of contraceptive implant discontinuation is very common and varies worldwide. This high prevalence of discontinuation may also indicate problems with implementation of family planning programmes. Consequently, a significant number of women are exposed to conception after discontinuation. Although studies have been conducted in Ethiopia, there are inconsistencies across studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of contraceptive implant discontinuation among women in Ethiopia. Published articles from various electronic databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Science Direct, AJOL and Cochrane library were systematically searched. All cross-sectional studies conducted on prevalence of contraceptive implant discontinuation and published up to 30 January 2022 were included in this review. To estimate the pooled prevalence, random effect model was used and a subgroup analysis was performed to identify the possible source of heterogeneity. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to identify possible publication bias. A total of 13 cross-sectional studies with 5012 participants were included. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 = 98.2%). However, there was no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.066). The estimated pooled prevalence of contraceptive implant discontinuation in Ethiopia was found to be 36.95% (95% confidence interval = 27.6-46.3). A subgroup analysis by time of discontinuation indicated that 21.5%, 42.2% and 33.5% of contraceptive implant user discontinue within 12 months, 2.5 years and 3 years, respectively. This meta-analysis indicated that the prevalence of discontinuation of contraceptive implant was found to be high in Ethiopia. Therefore, strengthening the appropriate counselling prior to insertion and proper follow-up, independent choice will improve the proportion of implants retention.

A Global Learning Agenda for the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG IUS): Addressing Challenges and Opportunities to Increase Access

The LNG IUS is one of the most effective forms of reversible contraception and has important noncontraceptive benefits but is currently not used at scale in any Family Planning 2020 focus country. A global working group developed a shared learning agenda to answer critical questions, harmonize approaches, avoid duplication, and facilitate introduction of the method within the context of informed choice.

Progestin-only contraception: injectables and implants

Progestin-only contraceptive injectables and implants are highly effective, longer-acting contraceptive methods that can be used by most women in most circumstances. Globally, 6% of women using modern contraception use injectables and 1% use implants. Injectables are the predominant contraceptive method used in sub-Saharan Africa, and account for 43% of modern contraceptive methods used. A lower-dose, subcutaneous formulation of the most widely used injectable, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, has been developed. Implants have the highest effectiveness of any contraceptive method. Commodity cost, which historically limited implant availability in low-resource countries, was markedly lowered between 2012 and 2013. Changes in menstrual bleeding patterns are extremely common with both methods, and a main cause of discontinuation. Advice from normative bodies differs on progestin-only contraceptive use by breastfeeding women 0-6 weeks postpartum. Whether these methods are associated with HIV acquisition is a controversial issue, with important implications for sub-Saharan Africa, which has a disproportionate burden of both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and maternal mortality.