A Reappraisal of Supernormal Conduction. In: Rosenbaum MB, Elizari MV, editors. Frontiers of Cardiac Electrophysiology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1983. pp. 427-56. [DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-6781-6_22]

Supernormal Conduction in the Anomalous Bundles of the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome: An Overlooked Electrophysiologic Property With Potential Clinical Implications

The anterograde refractory period (RP) of the accessory pathway (AP) is the main determinant factor of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. We describe 3 examples of anterograde supernormal conduction (SNC) and 1 of retrograde SNC in APs. The paradoxical early recovery of propagation due to SNC, well inside a prolonged anterograde RP in the AP, may play a relevant role to determine the rate of ventricular response during atrial fibrillation, eventually leading to extremely fast ventricular rates, syncope, and even ventricular fibrillation in patients with WPW syndrome supposed a priori to be exposed to a low risk of sudden cardiac death. This may require very precise conditions, including an enhanced adrenergic influence on the heart. Retrograde SNC in APs may also participate in the mechanism of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias that are not easily induced by programmed cardiac stimulation.

Right bundle branch block on alternate beats during acute pulmonary embolism

The electrocardiogram of a patient with acute pulmonary embolism showed right bundle branch block (RBBB) on alternate beats; following thrombolysis, the pattern evolved to persistent RBBB and eventually to normal conduction. Analysis of serial tracings suggested that the mechanism of RBBB alternans was tachycardia-dependent bidirectional bundle branch block, caused by prolongation of both anterograde and retrograde refractory periods (RPs) of the right bundle branch (RBB). The sinus impulse found the RBB refractory, and was conducted over the left bundle branch only, depolarizing the left ventricle and then attempting to penetrate retrogradely the RBB; at that time, however, the RBB was still refractory. When a QRS complex had a RBBB configuration, therefore, the RBB was not depolarized; the ensuing sinus impulse found the RBB fully responsive as a consequence of the long period intervening between two successive depolarizations, and resulted in normal intraventricular conduction. With right ventricular afterload decrease, the recovery of RBB anterograde and retrograde excitability was asynchronous, since the retrograde RP became normal earlier than the anterograde one. In accordance with the relatively short retrograde RP, the RBB was retrogradely invaded by the transseptal impulse coming from the left ventricle; this "shifted to the right" the anterograde RP of the RBB. The RBB, thus, was still refractory to the next sinus impulse, and RBBB again occurred; the RBB, thus, was once more depolarized retrogradely, and this led to perpetuation of RBBB. Finally, intraventricular conduction became normal owing to full normalization of RBB anterograde and retrograde refractoriness.

Supernormality with cycle length-dependent intra-His alternans: a new cause of group beating

This article describes a patient with baseline infranodal conduction disease. Following the administration of intravenous procainamide, the patient developed group beating. Careful electrophysiological evaluation revealed that the group beating was due to alternating intra-His conduction times. Systematic analysis of paced and spontaneous events provides strong evidence that the alternans results from supernormality within the His bundle.

Strength-interval curves for cardiac tissue predicted using the bidomain model

INTRODUCTION

Strength-interval curves are predicted for unipolar anodal and cathodal stimulation of cardiac muscle.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac tissue is represented by the bidomain model, and the active properties of the membrane are described by the Beeler-Reuter model. Two successive stimuli (S1 and S2) are delivered through a single extracellular electrode. The S2 threshold is determined as a function of the S1-S2 interval, for anodal and cathodal S2 stimuli with 2-, 5-, 10-, and 20-msec durations. Each of the resulting cathodal and anodal strength-interval curves is divided into two parts: one section corresponding to make stimulation (long intervals) and the other section corresponding to break stimulation (short intervals). Generally, the cathodal strength-interval curves are decreasing functions of interval, except for an anomalous section of the 20-msec duration cathodal curve in the interval range from 310 to 318 msec. At short intervals, the anodal strength-interval curve contains a deep dip, which is more prominent for longer S2 durations. The cathodal threshold is less than the anodal threshold for all intervals except those corresponding to the end of the refractory period.

CONCLUSION

The bidomain model predicts complex anodal and cathodal strength-interval curves, with the anodal curve containing a dip (supernormal stimulation). These results resemble the experimental observations of Dekker.

Supernormal conduction in the left bundle branch unmasked by the linking phenomenon

This presentation reflects a case of phase-3 left bundle branch block (LBBB). Analysis reveals that relatively early QRS complexes are wide, whereas beats occurring later than a critical time are narrow. There are, however, two unexpected phenomena: (1) an overlap occurs between the range of R-R intervals resulting in normal intraventricular conduction and the range of R-R intervals resulting in LBBB pattern. Complexes that follow a wide beat are often wide although they are associated with relatively long R-R intervals, whereas complexes that follow a normal beat tend to be normal even after relatively short R-R cycles. This is due to concealed retrograde penetration of the bundle branch that is blocked in anterograde direction (the so-called linking phenomenon). (2) Some early supraventricular impulses, paradoxically, resulted in normal intraventricular conduction. The phenomenon is a manifestation of supernormal LBB conduction, and only occurs following a wide QRS complex associated with retrograde activation of the LBB. The linking phenomenon reveals or unmasks the supernormal phase of LBB conduction. Following a retrograde and delayed activation of the LBB, the refractory period of the bundle branch is postponed, in such a way that a supraventricular impulse is allowed to occur during the early phase of supernormal conduction.

Linking in accessory pathways. Functional loss of antegrade preexcitation

BACKGROUND

Concealed retrograde activation has been proposed as a mechanism for antegrade conduction block in the bundle branches and atrioventricular accessory pathways. We studied this hypothesis (linking) in 10 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in whom antegrade preexcitation could be persistently blocked by overdrive atrial pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An atrial pacing protocol, with a decremental ramp followed by an incremental ramp, defined a range of atrial paced cycle lengths (linking window) associated with both persistent conduction and block in the accessory pathway. Within the limits of the linking window, the ability of an atrial impulse to conduct over the accessory pathway was dependent on the preceding state (i.e., conduction or block). The observed linking window ranged from 70 to 290 msec (mean, 185 +/- 68 msec) and closely approximated the measured delay in retrograde activation of the accessory pathway during persistent antegrade block. The mean antegrade effective refractory period of the accessory pathways was long (486 +/- 156 msec), and in each case, it exceeded the antegrade refractory period of the normal atrioventricular pathway. Critically timed premature ventricular extrastimuli, delivered while linking was maintained in the accessory pathway, were able to interrupt the linking and restore antegrade accessory pathway conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations suggest that accessory pathway linking is associated with bidirectional block in the accessory pathway. The ability to initiate linking (and the stability of the phenomenon) depends on a critical relation between antegrade accessory pathway refractoriness and the magnitude of retrograde accessory pathway activation delay.