Mitochondrial Metabolism in Cancer. A Tangled Topic. Which Role for Proteomics? In: Urbani A, Babu M, editors. Mitochondria in Health and in Sickness. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 1-16. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8367-0_1]

Warburg Effect Revisited: Embodiment of Classical Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry. Current State and Prospects

The Nobel Prize Winner (1931) Dr. Otto H. Warburg had established that the primary energy source of the cancer cell is aerobic glycolysis (the Warburg effect). He also postulated the hypothesis about "the prime cause of cancer", which is a matter of debate nowadays. Contrary to the hypothesis, his discovery was recognized entirely. However, the discovery had almost vanished in the heat of battle about the hypothesis. The prime cause of cancer is essential for the prevention and diagnosis, yet the effects that influence tumor growth are more important for cancer treatment. Due to the Warburg effect, a large amount of data has been accumulated on biochemical changes in the cell and the organism as a whole. Due to the Warburg effect, the recovery of normal biochemistry and oxygen respiration and the restoration of the work of mitochondria of cancer cells can inhibit tumor growth and lead to remission. Here, we review the current knowledge on the inhibition of abnormal glycolysis, neutralization of its consequences, and normalization of biochemical parameters, as well as recovery of oxygen respiration of a cancer cell and mitochondrial function from the point of view of classical biochemistry and organic chemistry.

To betray or to fight? The dual identity of the mitochondria in cancer

Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that provide energy for oxidative phosphorylation in cells. Equally, they are the major sites for the metabolism of amino acids, lipids and iron. When cells become cancerous, the morphology, cellular location and metabolic mode of the mitochondria change accordingly. These mitochondrial changes can have two opposing effects on cancer: procancer and anticancer effects. Specifically, mitochondria play roles in the fight against cancer by participating in processes such as ferroptosis, mitophagy and antitumor immunity. Contrastingly, cancer cells can also enslave mitochondria to give them the conditions necessary for growth and metastasis. Moreover, through mitochondria, cancer cells can escape from immune surveillance, resulting in their immune escape and enhanced malignant transformation ability. At present, cancer-related studies of mitochondria are one-sided; therefore, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding by systematically reviewing the two-sided cancer-related properties of mitochondria. Mitochondrial-targeted drugs are gradually emerging and showing significant advantages in cancer treatment; thus, our in-depth exploration of mitochondria in cancer will help to provide theoretical support for the future provision of efficient and low-toxicity cancer treatments.

Effects of GPR81 silencing combined with cisplatin stimulation on biological function in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) is a malignant tumor found in the head and neck region. Lactate receptor 1, also known as G protein‑coupled receptor81 (GPR81), has been reported to play a vital role in cancer growth and metabolism. However, the function of GPR81 in HSCC remains largely unknown. The present study investigated the effect of GPR81 on cell survival and GPR81‑mediated energy metabolism under cisplatin treatment in HSCC. GPR81 knockdown reduced the proliferation and invasion of the human HSCC cell line FaDu. Furthermore, GPR81 silencing combined with cisplatin treatment increased the expression of translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 20 at the mRNA and protein levels (P<0.05). mRNA and protein expression of phosphofructokinase 1 in mRNA appeared to be downregulated in GPR81 knockdown FaDu cells treated with cisplatin, although this was not statistically significant. GPR81 silencing and cisplatin challenge showed no significant upregulation compared with the control, but significant downregulation in mRNA and protein levels compared with the shRNA‑scramble group. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry with annexin V and 7‑aminoactinomycin D. GPR81 silencing and cisplatin led to an increased apoptotic rate. Moreover, absence of GPR81 combined with cisplatin exposure increased caspase‑3 expression and decreased Bcl‑2 levels. The results of the present study suggested that GPR81 and cisplatin sensitivity played an important role in HSCC growth and metabolism.