Current Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) gene signatures predict outcomes in breast and prostate tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, tumor-derived RNA expression signatures have been developed for the two most commonly diagnosed tumors worldwide, namely prostate and breast tumors, in order to improve both outcome prediction and treatment decision-making. In this context, molecular signatures gained by main components of the tumor microenvironment, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), have been explored as prognostic and therapeutic tools. Nevertheless, a deeper understanding of the significance of CAFs-related gene signatures in breast and prostate cancers still remains to be disclosed.

METHODS

RNA sequencing technology (RNA-seq) was employed to profile and compare the transcriptome of CAFs isolated from patients affected by breast and prostate tumors. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) characterizing breast and prostate CAFs were intersected with data from public datasets derived from bulk RNA-seq profiles of breast and prostate tumor patients. Pathway enrichment analyses allowed us to appreciate the biological significance of the DEGs. K-means clustering was applied to construct CAFs-related gene signatures specific for breast and prostate cancer and to stratify independent cohorts of patients into high and low gene expression clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were employed to predict differences in the outcome parameters of the clusters of patients. Decision-tree analysis was used to validate the clustering results and boosting calculations were then employed to improve the results obtained by the decision-tree algorithm.

RESULTS

Data obtained in breast CAFs allowed us to assess a signature that includes 8 genes (ITGA11, THBS1, FN1, EMP1, ITGA2, FYN, SPP1, and EMP2) belonging to pro-metastatic signaling routes, such as the focal adhesion pathway. Survival analyses indicated that the cluster of breast cancer patients showing a high expression of the aforementioned genes displays worse clinical outcomes. Next, we identified a prostate CAFs-related signature that includes 11 genes (IL13RA2, GDF7, IL33, CXCL1, TNFRSF19, CXCL6, LIFR, CXCL5, IL7, TSLP, and TNFSF15) associated with immune responses. A low expression of these genes was predictive of poor survival rates in prostate cancer patients. The results obtained were significantly validated through a two-step approach, based on unsupervised (clustering) and supervised (classification) learning techniques, showing a high prediction accuracy (≥ 90%) in independent RNA-seq cohorts.

CONCLUSION

We identified a huge heterogeneity in the transcriptional profile of CAFs derived from breast and prostate tumors. Of note, the two novel CAFs-related gene signatures might be considered as reliable prognostic indicators and valuable biomarkers for a better management of breast and prostate cancer patients.

Beyond glyco-proteomics-Understanding the role of genetics in cancer biomarkers

The development of robust cancer biomarkers is the most effective way to improve overall survival, as early detection and treatment leads to significantly better clinical outcomes. Many of the cancer biomarkers that have been identified and are clinically utilized are glycoproteins, oftentimes a specific glycoform. Aberrant glycosylation is a common theme in cancer, with dysregulated glycosylation driving tumor initiation and metastasis, and abnormal glycosylation can be detection both on the tissue surface and in serum. However, most cancer types are heterogeneous in regard to tumor genomics, and this heterogeneity extends to cancer glycomics. This limits the sensitivity of standalone glycan-based biomarkers, which has slowed their implementation clinically. However, if targeted biomarker development can take into account genomic tumor information, the development of complementary biomarkers that target unique cancer subgroups can be accomplished. This idea suggests the need for algorithm-based cancer biomarkers, which can utilize multiple biomarkers along with relevant demographic information. This concept has already been established in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with the GALAD score, and an algorithm-based approach would likely be effective in improving biomarker sensitivity for additional cancer types. In order to increase cancer diagnostic biomarker sensitivity, there must be more targeted biomarker development that considers tumor genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and clinical data while identifying tumor biomarkers.