Combination therapy in stage C and D prostatic cancer: rationale and five year clinical experience

Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention Agent Development: The National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention Portfolio

PURPOSE

We describe the current National Cancer Institute chemoprevention agent development program and provide a summary of the intermediate end points used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Institute is currently sponsoring a wide range of studies of promising chemoprevention agents in a variety of informative cohorts, eg high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, positive family history of cancer, increased prostate specific antigen with negative biopsies, prostate cancer followed expectantly, prostate cancer awaiting definitive therapy and the general population. The rationale for each agent under investigation is derived from epidemiological observations, prostate cancer treatment trials, secondary analyses of large cancer prevention studies, an understanding of cancer biology and prostate carcinogenesis, and/or experimental animal models.

RESULTS

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process occurring over decades which is characterized by disruption of the normal regulatory pathways controlling cellular proliferation, programmed cell death and differentiation. Administration of agents to reverse, inhibit or slow this process of malignant transformation is known as chemoprevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoprevention represents a promising approach to reducing the morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer. A variety of agents are currently being studied in phase 2 clinical trials, some of which may warrant subsequent evaluation in phase 3 trials with definitive cancer end points. Two large phase 3 trials, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, which are ongoing, are also sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

Systemic management of prostate cancer

The objective of this review is to explore different therapeutic options for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Orchiectomy, estrogen therapy, synthetic LHRH analogs and possibly antiandrogens are equally effective frontline treatment modalities. Ketoconazole is indicated in emergency situations, but chronic use is prevented by serious idiosyncratic toxicity and by long term complications. Combined androgen blockade (CAB), with leuprolide (or tryptorelin) and flutamide is more effective than single modality treatment in patients capable of strict treatment compliance. Estramustine phosphate may be as effective as CAB and may be the frontline treatment of choice in sexually active patients. Institution of single modality treatment may be delayed until cancer becomes symptomatic. Controversy lingers over whether the institution of CAB at an earlier time may improve progression free survival (PFS) and survival. Research projects of immediate clinical relevance include: comparison of CAB and estramustine; determination of the optimal time for CAB; study of other forms of CAB; and phase II trials of new cytotoxic agents.