Isolation of 8-methoxypsoralen accessible DNA domains from chromatin of intact cells

H4K20me2: Orchestrating the recruitment of DNA repair factors in nucleotide excision repair

The integrity of the genome is maintained by specific DNA repair pathways. The main pathway removing DNA lesions induced by exposure to UV light is nucleotide excision repair (NER). The DNA damage response at chromatin is accompanied by the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the lesion site and the deposition of specific histone marks. The function of these histone marks in NER stays for the most part elusive. We have recently reported that the methyltransferase MMSET catalyzes the dimethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20me2) at the lesion site. The deposition of H4K20me2 at DNA damage sites elicits the recruitment of the NER factor XPA providing evidence for an H4K20me2-dependent DNA repair factor recruitment mechanism during lesion recognition in the global-genomic branch of NER. Here we discuss how H4K20me2 might impact on the chromatin conformation and the DNA damage response.

Chromatin dynamics after DNA damage: The legacy of the access-repair-restore model

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into chromatin, which is the physiological substrate for all DNA transactions, including DNA damage and repair. Chromatin organization imposes major constraints on DNA damage repair and thus undergoes critical rearrangements during the repair process. These rearrangements have been integrated into the "access-repair-restore" (ARR) model, which provides a molecular framework for chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage. Here, we take a historical perspective on the elaboration of this model and describe the molecular players involved in damaged chromatin reorganization in human cells. In particular, we present our current knowledge of chromatin assembly coupled to DNA damage repair, focusing on the role of histone variants and their dedicated chaperones. Finally, we discuss the impact of chromatin rearrangements after DNA damage on chromatin function and epigenome maintenance.

Prion-induced neurotoxicity: Possible role for cell cycle activity and DNA damage response

Protein misfolding neurodegenerative diseases arise through neurotoxicity induced by aggregation of host proteins. These conditions include Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, motor neuron disease, tauopathies and prion diseases. Collectively, these conditions are a challenge to society because of the increasing aged population and through the real threat to human food security by animal prion diseases. It is therefore important to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie protein misfolding-induced neurotoxicity as this will form the basis for designing strategies to alleviate their burden. Prion diseases are an important paradigm for neurodegenerative conditions in general since several of these maladies have now been shown to display prion-like phenomena. Increasingly, cell cycle activity and the DNA damage response are recognised as cellular events that participate in the neurotoxic process of various neurodegenerative diseases, and their associated animal models, which suggests they are truly involved in the pathogenic process and are not merely epiphenomena. Here we review the role of cell cycle activity and the DNA damage response in neurodegeneration associated with protein misfolding diseases, and suggest that these events contribute towards prion-induced neurotoxicity. In doing so, we highlight PrP transgenic Drosophila as a tractable model for the genetic analysis of transmissible mammalian prion disease.

Reshaping chromatin after DNA damage: the choreography of histone proteins

DNA damage signaling and repair machineries operate in a nuclear environment where DNA is wrapped around histone proteins and packaged into chromatin. Understanding how chromatin structure is restored together with the DNA sequence during DNA damage repair has been a topic of intense research. Indeed, chromatin integrity is central to cell functions and identity. However, chromatin shows remarkable plasticity in response to DNA damage. This review presents our current knowledge of chromatin dynamics in the mammalian cell nucleus in response to DNA double strand breaks and UV lesions. I provide an overview of the key players involved in regulating histone dynamics in damaged chromatin regions, focusing on histone chaperones and their concerted action with histone modifiers, chromatin remodelers and repair factors. I also discuss how these dynamics contribute to reshaping chromatin and, by altering the chromatin landscape, may affect the maintenance of epigenetic information.

How to restore chromatin structure and function in response to DNA damage--let the chaperones play: delivered on 9 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St Petersburg, Russia

Histone deposition onto DNA assisted by specific chaperones forms the chromatin basic unit and serves to package the genome within the cell nucleus. The resulting chromatin organization, often referred to as the epigenome, contributes to a unique transcriptional program that defines cell identity. Importantly, during cellular life, substantial alterations in chromatin structure may arise due to cell stress, including DNA damage, which not only challenges the integrity of the genome but also threatens the epigenome. Considerable efforts have been made to decipher chromatin dynamics in response to genotoxic stress, and to assess how it affects both genome and epigenome stability. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of DNA damage-induced chromatin plasticity in mammalian cells. We focus specifically on the dynamics of histone H3 variants in response to UV irradiation, and highlight the role of their dedicated chaperones in restoring both chromatin structure and function. Finally, we discuss how, in addition to restoring chromatin integrity, the cellular networks that signal and repair DNA damage may also provide a window of opportunity for modulating the information conveyed by chromatin.

Chromatin dynamics during nucleotide excision repair: histones on the move

It has been a long-standing question how DNA damage repair proceeds in a nuclear environment where DNA is packaged into chromatin. Several decades of analysis combining in vitro and in vivo studies in various model organisms ranging from yeast to human have markedly increased our understanding of the mechanisms underlying chromatin disorganization upon damage detection and re-assembly after repair. Here, we review the methods that have been developed over the years to delineate chromatin alterations in response to DNA damage by focusing on the well-characterized Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway. We also highlight how these methods have provided key mechanistic insight into histone dynamics coupled to repair in mammals, raising new issues about the maintenance of chromatin integrity. In particular, we discuss how NER factors and central players in chromatin dynamics such as histone modifiers, nucleosome remodeling factors, and histone chaperones function to mobilize histones during repair.

Duck hepatitis B virus inactivation and 8-methoxypsoralen photoadduct formation in human platelet concentrates

Photochemical inactivation (PCI) of virus and bacteria in platelet concentrates (PC) has been demonstrated using 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and long-wavelength UV light (UVA). To study inactivation of blood-borne virus, we have employed duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV), a model for human hepatitis B virus. A specific hepatocyte culture infectivity assay, with PCR detection, could measure 5-6 log10 virus kill. The DHBV inactivation in PC was dependent on UVA dose, was enhanced when plasma was reduced from 100% to 20% and was limited by 8-MOP solubility in the reduced-plasma medium. Optimum conditions for PCI were 100 micrograms/mL 8-MOP in 20% plasma and 80% synthetic platelet storage medium. A radiolabeling assay for 8-MOP photoadducts in hepatocytes seeded into PC confirmed that DHBV inactivation reflected DNA modification and indicated that adduct formation was insensitive to minor variations in conditions. Kinetic modeling indicated that optimum adduct formation was a compromise between 8-MOP dark binding and optical transmittance and that plasma proteins competed for 8-MOP binding. The PCI results in various media correlated with corresponding DNA modification densities and were compared to statistical models incorporating DHBV characteristics and predictions of 8-MOP crosslink formation between DNA strands. Behavior was consistent with one or a small number of lethal modifications per DNA strand, including monoadducts, but probably not crosslinks alone. A minor subpopulation of DHBV was found to be somewhat more difficult to inactivate, consistent with three-fold lower modification, due possibly to single-stranded DNA character or host repair of photoadducts.

Relative sensitivity of 32P-postlabelling of DNA and the autoradiographic UDS assay in the liver of mice exposed to 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)

In contrast to earlier studies conducted at lower dose levels, 2AAF is shown to induce a positive UDS response in the liver of mice dosed orally at dose levels between 500 and 1000 mg/kg. Similarly exposed mice had low levels of 2AAF-related hepatic DNA adducts at dose levels in the range 10-1000 mg/kg 2AAF, as determined by 32P-postlabelling analysis. It is concluded that the attenuated UDS response observed in the mouse liver, as compared to the rat liver, is due primarily to metabolic differences between these two species, coupled to a reduced capacity for UDS in the mouse liver for a given level of total 2AAF-related adducts per unit of DNA. These observations are compared and contrasted with identical studies conducted in the rat and reported in the preceding paper (Gallagher et al., 1991).

Relative sensitivity of 32P-postlabelling of DNA and the autoradiographic UDS assay in the liver of rats exposed to 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF)

Groups of male Alderley Park rats were dosed concomitantly with 2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAF) by gavage at doses between 0.01 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, and livers sampled 2-72 h later. The liver of one group of animals was perfused to yield hepatocytes which were assayed in vitro for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) via incorporation of tritiated thymidine and autoradiography. DNA was extracted from the livers of the other group and DNA adduct levels determined using the 32P-postlabelling technique. The major C-8 2-aminofluorene/guanosine adduct and 3 minor adducts were quantitated, enabling the relative sensitivity of the 2 techniques to be compared. A dose- and time-related UDS response was observed, which, at the most sensitive time-point (12 h) enabled DNA repair to be discerned at a dose level of 0.1-1 mg/kg of 2AAF, a response classified as formally positive at 5 mg/kg 2AAF. Only the C-8 adduct, as determined by 32P-postlabelling, was discernible at 0.01 mg/kg of 2AAF, although other adducts were visible on autoradiograms at higher dose levels. It is concluded that as part of a well-defined dose response, UDS can be discerned with confidence for doses of 2AAF between approximately 0.1 and 5 mg/kg, and DNA adducts for doses of 2AAF between approximately 0.01 and 1 mg/kg. Discernible UDS for 2AAF in the rat liver is apparent at approximately 13 DNA (total) adducts/10(8) nucleotides, or approximately 8 DNA (C-8) adducts/10(8) nucleotides. The presumed C-8 2-acetylaminofluorene/guanosine adduct, prepared by reaction of 2-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (2AAAF) with DNA, was a significant but unreliable marker of 2AAF/DNA adducts in the rat liver in vivo. DNA repair did not appear to remove DNA adducts selectively, and adducts remained in DNA when discernible DNA repair had ceased.