The diagnosis and treatment of chlamydial conjunctivitis

Clinical examination and laboratory tests for estimation of trachoma prevalence in a remote setting: what are they really telling us?

Worldwide, an estimated 84 million people have active trachoma and 7.6 million people have trachomatous trichiasis. WHO's SAFE strategy is an effective tool in the worldwide effort to eliminate blinding trachoma, but its institution and monitoring requires a simple, reliable, and cost-effective method to detect disease. To date, clinical examination has provided the main method of diagnosis. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with nucleic acid amplification tests does not always correlate well with clinical findings, which has prompted the suggestion that these methods should replace clinical examination. However, a review of the research carried out in animals and human beings suggests the relation between laboratory tests and clinical examination is due to the kinetics of trachoma and not to an inherent problem in either detection system. Given the increased difficulties of using laboratory tests in parts of the world where trachoma is endemic, we should not abandon clinical grading as a tool to assess the need for, and the effectiveness of, trachoma intervention programmes.

Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival swabs

AIMS/BACKGROUND

Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the west occurs as opthalmia neonatorum, acquired from the mother, or adult paratrachoma which is also associated with current genital tract infection. Accurate rapid laboratory diagnosis facilitates management, but the relative merits of antigen detection or DNA amplification tests are unresolved.

METHODS

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was developed which amplified part of the plasmid shared by all the serovars of C trachomatis. Conjunctival swabs were tested using an in house immune dot-blot test (IDBT) for chlamydial lipopolysaccharide antigen, a commercial direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test for chlamydial elementary bodies, and the PCR (DNA extracted using guanidinium lysis buffer).

RESULTS

The PCR achieved a detection limit of 100 plasmid copies (10 elementary bodies). In a combined retrospective and prospective clinical evaluation, the PCR and IDBT gave identical results with 21 positive and 57 negative eye swabs. However, interpretation of the DFA test required meticulous examination of the stained smear, sometimes by two microscopists.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCR is likely to play an increasing role in the diagnosis of ocular C trachomatis infection because of its excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Incidence of adenoviral and chlamydial coinfection in acute follicular conjunctivitis

PURPOSE/METHODS

After we studied a case of chlamydial and adenoviral coinfection in a 20-year-old woman, we determined the incidence of chlamydial infection in patients with acute adenoviral conjunctivitis. In a randomized retrospective study, we evaluated 100 specimens of patients with culture-proven adenoviral conjunctivitis.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Three of 100 (3%) specimens tested positive for chlamydial DNA using polymerase chain reaction. Adenoviral and chlamydial coinfection is rare, yet should be considered in patients with prolonged follicular keratoconjunctivitis.

The treatment and follow up of adult chlamydial ophthalmia

Sixty two patients diagnosed as having adult chlamydial ophthalmia were treated with oral doxycycline and roxithromycin in association and tetracycline eye wash for 2 weeks. Chlamydial ophthalmia was diagnosed by laboratory detection of the micro-organism in ocular specimens using direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody staining for Chlamydia trachomatis, chlamydial culture in cycloheximide treated McCoy cells, and Giemsa staining. An immunoenzymatic method for detection of specific IgG and IgA in patients' serum was used as an additional test to confirm the diagnosis. All patients were reexamined 3 weeks after completing their course of antibiotics and in the case of persistent infection a further course of treatment was given. With this treatment regimen 48 out of 62 patients (77.4%) were cured after three courses. Because of the risks of an inadequate response to therapy, we recommend a proper post-treatment follow up in all patients with chlamydial eye infections.