Rod densitometry in night blindness: a review and two puzzling cases. Rod densitometry in night blindness

Photoreceptor and postreceptor responses in congenital stationary night blindness

PURPOSE

To investigate photoreceptor and postreceptor retinal function in patients with congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB).

METHODS

Forty-one patients with CSNB (ages 0.19-32 years) were studied. ERG responses to a series of full-field stimuli were obtained under scotopic and photopic conditions and were used to categorize the CSNB patients as complete (cCSNB) or incomplete (iCSNB). Rod and cone photoreceptor (R(ROD), S(ROD), R(CONE), S(CONE)) and rod-driven postreceptor (V(MAX), log σ) response parameters were calculated from the a- and b-waves. Cone-driven responses to 30 Hz flicker and ON and OFF responses to a long duration (150 ms) flash were also obtained. Dark-adapted thresholds were measured. Analysis of variance was used to compare data from patients with cCSNB, patients with iCSNB, and controls.

RESULTS

We found significant reduction in saturated photoreceptor amplitude (R(ROD), R(CONE)) but normal photoreceptor sensitivity (S(ROD), S(CONE)) in both CSNB groups. Rod-driven postreceptor response amplitude (V(MAX)) and sensitivity (log σ) were significantly reduced in CSNB. Log σ was significantly worse in cCSNB than in iCSNB; this was the only scotopic parameter that differed between the two CSNB groups. Photopic b-wave amplitude increased monotonically with stimulus strength in CSNB patients rather than showing a normal photopic hill. The amplitude of the 30-Hz flicker response was reduced compared with controls, more so in iCSNB than in cCSNB. The mean dark-adapted threshold was significantly elevated in CSNB, more so in cCSNB than in iCSNB.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are evidence of normal photoreceptor function (despite the low saturated photoresponse amplitude) and anomalous postreceptor retinal circuitry.

A distinctive form of congenital stationary night blindness with cone ON-pathway dysfunction

PURPOSE

To characterize a distinctive form of congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB).

DESIGN

Observational case report.

PARTICIPANTS

A 30-year-old male with a history of night blindness, several members of his family, a patient with "complete" congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB1), and groups of age-similar control subjects.

METHODS

Rod-system function was evaluated by measuring psychophysical dark-adapted thresholds, by recording dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs), and by fundus reflectometry. Cone-system function was evaluated by recording light-adapted ERGs, including those to sawtooth flicker, and by recording light-adapted visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to luminance increments and decrements.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dark-adapted thresholds, ERGs, rhodopsin double densities, Goldmann visual fields, and VEPs.

RESULTS

The patient's visual acuity, visual fields, and color vision were normal. His peripheral dark-adapted thresholds were rod-mediated but elevated by approximately 3 log units above normal. Rhodopsin double density and bleaching recovery were normal. His dark-adapted maximal-flash ERG showed a "negative" waveform, in which the b-wave was more reduced in amplitude than the a-wave, although the a-wave amplitude was also reduced. The rod photoreceptors contributed to the patient's dark-adapted ERGs, as illustrated by the unequal responses to cone-matched stimuli. The patient's cone-mediated thresholds for long-wavelength stimuli were within the normal range. However, his light-adapted brief-flash b-wave was abnormal in amplitude and implicit time. Selective abnormalities of the ON responses of the cone system were apparent in the patient's reduced b-wave amplitude to rapid-on flicker with a normal response to rapid-off flicker, and his prolonged VEP latencies to increments but not to decrements.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall pattern of findings distinguishes this patient from previously described forms of CSNB. The results suggest that two factors likely contribute to the patient's night blindness: (1) a rod phototransduction defect and (2) a postreceptoral defect. The results also indicate dysfunction within the cone ON pathway.

Clinical applications of fundus reflection densitometry

Fundus reflection densitometry or retinal densitometry is a non-invasive technique to examine the visual photopigment kinetics in living eyes. The technique is based on the comparison of the reflected light from the fundus in a fully light adapted eye (when all visual photopigment has been bleached) with the reflected light following complete dark adaptation (when the retina contains its maximum amount of visual photopigment). The technique provides a measure of the density of visual photopigment, its time constant of regeneration, its distribution and spectral characteristics if measured at a series of wavelengths. Fundus reflection densitometry in the human eye was introduced 40 years ago. Presently, it is the only available technique from which direct and objective insight can be obtained into visual photopigment. This knowledge is particularly relevant in eyes where abnormalities of photoreceptor function are suspected. This paper summarizes the current knowledge of fundus reflection densitometry in the diseased and in the aging human retina, gathered over the last 30 years. Considerable improvements of the instrument for clinical purposes have been obtained, and are also discussed.

Diagnostic clinical findings of a new syndrome with night blindness, maculopathy, and enhanced S cone sensitivity

We studied eight patients who had night blindness, maculopathy (often cystoid), degenerative changes in the region of the vascular arcades, relatively mild visual field loss, and an unusual but characteristic electroretinogram. The dark-adapted electroretinogram showed no response to low-intensity stimuli that normally activate the rods, but large, slow responses to high-intensity stimuli. These large, slow waveforms persisted without change under light adaptation, and showed a striking mismatch to photopically balanced short and long wavelength stimuli (with sensitivity much greater to short than long wave-lengths). Since there is evidence from other studies that the electroretinogram and psychophysical responses represent hypersensitivity of short wavelength-sensitive (S or blue) cones, we propose that this disorder be called the enhanced S cone syndrome. There can be different degrees of severity in this syndrome, and progression appears to be slow.