Binocularity in comitant strabismus: II. Objective evaluation with visual evoked responses

Improvement in binocular summation after strabismus surgery

IMPORTANCE

Binocular summation (BiS), or improvement in visual acuity using binocular vision compared with the better eye alone, is diminished in patients with strabismus. However, it is still not known how strabismus surgery affects BiS.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether BiS improves after strabismus surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Prospective study of 97 patients undergoing strabismus surgery between September 1, 2011, and January 31, 2014, comparing preoperative and postoperative measures of BiS. Patients were recruited within 1 month before undergoing strabismus surgery. The study took place at an academic pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus practice.

INTERVENTION

Strabismus surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All patients underwent high- and low-contrast visual acuity testing binocularly and monocularly at preoperative and 2-month postoperative visits. Binocular summation was calculated for high-contrast Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts and Sloan low-contrast acuity charts at 2.5% and 1.25% contrast as the difference between the binocular score and that of the better eye. Preoperative and postoperative values were compared.

RESULTS

There was an improvement in BiS at the 2 low-contrast levels for all patients and for all contrast levels in the 75 patients in whom surgery successfully restored binocular alignment. For low-contrast acuity, the proportion of patients with a BiS score of at least 5 letters postoperatively was almost twice that of preoperatively (21% to 30% and 13% to 26% for 2.5% contrast and 1.25% contrast, respectively). Similarly, the proportion of patients with binocular inhibition (BiS score worse by at least 5 letters than the better eye score) was decreased postoperatively at all contrast levels (from 22% to 14% for 1.25% contrast). Thirty-one percent of patients experienced improvement in BiS scores postoperatively at the lowest contrast level.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Binocular summation scores improved postoperatively in most patients undergoing strabismus surgery. This occurred most frequently at the lowest contrast level. These findings suggest that improved BiS could represent a newly recognized functional benefit from the surgical correction of strabismus. Further studies evaluating the correlation of BiS with stereopsis, visual field expansion, and quality of life will be necessary to fully evaluate the role that improved BiS has in improving binocularity postoperatively.

Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition

IMPORTANCE

Binocular summation (BiS) is defined as the superiority of visual function for binocular over monocular viewing. Binocular summation decreases with age and large interocular differences in visual acuity. To our knowledge, BiS has not heretofore been well studied as a functional measure of binocularity in strabismus.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of strabismus on BiS using a battery of psychophysical tasks that are clinically relevant and easy to use and to determine whether strabismus is associated with binocular inhibition in extreme cases.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

University-based eye institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Strabismic patients recruited during 2010 to 2012 from a preoperative clinic and control participants with no history of eye disease other than refractive error.

INTERVENTION

A battery of psychophysical and electrophysiological tests including Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity, Sloan low-contrast acuity (LCA) (2.5% and 1.25%), Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Binocular summation was calculated as the ratio between binocular and better-eye individual scores.

RESULTS

Sixty strabismic and 80 control participants were prospectively examined (age range, 8-60 years). Mean BiS was significantly lower in the strabismic patients than controls for LCA (2.5% and 1.25%, P = .005 and <.001, respectively). For 1.25% LCA, strabismic patients had a mean BiS score less than 1, indicating binocular inhibition (ie, the binocular score was less than that of the better eye's monocular score). There was no significant difference in BiS for contrast thresholds on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, or sweep visual evoked potential contrast sensitivity. Regression analysis revealed a significant worsening of BiS with strabismus for 2.5% (P = .009) and 1.25% (P = .002) LCA, after accounting for age.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Strabismic patients demonstrate subnormal BiS and even binocular inhibition for LCA, suggesting that strabismus impairs visual function more than previously appreciated. This may explain why strabismic patients who are not diplopic close 1 eye in visually demanding situations. This finding clarifies the visual deficits impacting quality of life in strabismic patients and may represent a novel measure by which to evaluate and monitor function in strabismus.

A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia

Background

Although their eyes are pointing in different directions, people with long-standing strabismic amblyopia typically do not experience double-vision or indeed any visual symptoms arising from their condition. It is generally believed that the phenomenon of suppression plays a major role in dealing with the consequences of amblyopia and strabismus, by preventing images from the weaker/deviating eye from reaching conscious awareness. Suppression is thus a highly sophisticated coping mechanism. Although suppression has been studied for over 100 years the literature is equivocal in relation to the extent of the retina that is suppressed, though the method used to investigate suppression is crucial to the outcome. There is growing evidence that some measurement methods lead to artefactual claims that suppression exists when it does not.

Methodology/Results

Here we present the results of an experiment conducted with a new method to examine the prevalence, depth and extent of suppression in ten individuals with strabismic amblyopia. Seven subjects (70%) showed no evidence whatsoever for suppression and in the three individuals who did (30%), the depth and extent of suppression was small.

Conclusions

Suppression may play a much smaller role in dealing with the negative consequences of strabismic amblyopia than previously thought. Whereas recent claims of this nature have been made only in those with micro-strabismus our results show extremely limited evidence for suppression across the central visual field in strabismic amblyopes more generally. Instead of suppressing the image from the weaker/deviating eye, we suggest the visual system of individuals with strabismic amblyopia may act to maximise the possibilities for binocular co-operation. This is consistent with recent evidence from strabismic and amblyopic individuals that their binocular mechanisms are intact, and that, just as in visual normals, performance with two eyes is better than with the better eye alone in these individuals.

Disparity tuning of binocular facilitation and suppression after normal versus abnormal visual development

PURPOSE

To study the pattern of facilitatory and suppressive binocular interactions in stereodeficient patients with strabismus and in healthy controls.

METHODS

Visual evoked potentials were recorded in response to a Vernier onset/offset pattern presented to one eye, either monocularly or paired dichoptically with a straight vertical square-wave grating, which, when fused with the target in the other eye, gave rise to a percept of a series of bands appearing in depth from an otherwise uniform plane or with a grating that contained offsets that produced a standing disparity and the appearance of a constantly segmented image, portions of which moved in depth.

RESULTS

Participants with normal stereopsis showed facilitative and suppressive binocular interactions that depended on which dichoptic target was presented. Patients with longstanding, constant strabismus lacked normal facilitative binocular interactions. The response to a normally facilitative stimulus was reduced below the monocular level when it was presented to the dominant eye of patients without anisometropia, consistent with classical strabismic suppression of the nondominant eye. The dominant eye of strabismic patients without anisometropia retained suppressive input from crossed but not uncrossed disparity stimuli presented to the nondominant eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal disparity processing can be detected with the dichoptic VEP method we describe. Our results suggest that suppression in stereoblind, nonamblyopic observers is determined by a binocular mechanism responsive to disparity. In some cases, the sign of the disparity is important, and this suggests a mechanism that can explain diplopia in patients made exotropic after surgery for esotropia.

Visual evoked potentials during suppression in exotropic and esotropic strabismics: strabismic suppression objectified

BACKGROUND

We performed an electrophysiological study in order to objectify suppression in strabismus. The extent of cortical involvement in the process of interocular suppression was also explored. Possible differences in the suppressive process of esotropic and exotropic strabismics were also studied.

METHODS

An electroencephalographic recorder with eight leads was applied to the posterior one-third of the skull; three occipital, three parietal, and two temporal leads. We measured the activity of these visual cortical areas during stimulation of each eye under monocular as well as binocular viewing conditions with hemisinusoidal light pulses in a nature-like complex visual background. Recordings were made from six primary esotropic strabismic subjects and four primary exotropic and one consecutive exotropic strabismic subject. Also, five normal controls were studied.

RESULTS

A characteristic, triphasic response complex was found at approximately 80 ms following the start of each light pulse under monocular viewing conditions in the dominant and the nondominant eye. However, under dichoptic viewing conditions in the nondominant eye of all esotropic cases as well as in the nondominant eye of three of five exotropic cases, this response complex was completely absent. They showed approximately 100% reduction of their cortical response activity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show the vast extent of the cortex that is involved in the suppressive process, giving a good insight in the power of suppression.

Deficiency of adaptive control of the binocular coordination of saccades in strabismus

Disconjugate (different in the two eyes) oculomotor adaptation is driven by the need to maintain binocular vision. Since binocular vision is deficient in strabismus, we wondered whether oculomotor disconjugate adaptive capabilities are deficient in such subjects. We studied eight adult subjects with constant, long-standing convergent strabismus of variable angles (4-30 prism D). No subject had severe amblyopia. Binocular vision was evaluated with stereoacuity tests. Two subjects had peripheral binocular vision and gross stereopsis; two other subjects had abnormal retinal correspondence and abnormal or pseudo gross stereopsis. In the other subjects binocular vision and stereopsis were absent. To stimulate disconjugate changes of saccades, subjects viewed for 20 min an image that was magnified in one eye (aniseikonia). Subjects with residual peripheral binocular vision and even subjects with pseudo or abnormal binocular vision showed disconjugate changes of the binocular coordination of their saccades; these changes reduced the disparity resulting from the aniseikonia. In contrast, for subjects without binocular vision the changes were not correlated with the disparity induced by the aniseikonia. Rather, these changes served to improve fixation of one or the other eye individually.

Binocular interactions and steady-state VEPs. A study in normal and defective binocular vision (Part II)

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence indicates that an index of binocular activity may be found in some properties of steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs), such as amplitude facilitation and phase shortening. We evaluated binocular interactions with steady-state VEPs in normal subjects as well as in patients with concomitant strabismus and defective binocular vision.

METHODS

Steady-state (8-Hz) VEPs to counterphased sinusoidal gratings (1.2 c/deg spatial frequency) of low contrast (3.2%) were recorded in 19 esotropic patients and in 18 age-matched controls. Patients had either anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC, n = 10) or suppression (n = 9) in casual seeing conditions (striated glasses). In all subjects, both binocular and monocular VEPs displayed a major component at twice the stimulation frequency (second harmonic), whose amplitude and phase were measured. A binocular interaction index was obtained by comparing binocular VEPs (BVEPs) with the sum (vectorial) of the two monocular VEPs (SMVEPs).

RESULTS

In normal subjects, BVEPs were larger in amplitude than SMVEPs (facilitation), and shortened in latency (phase). On average, both ARC and suppression patients displayed loss in amplitude facilitation and absence of phase shortening. However, 50% of ARC patients showed clear VEP facilitation. In both ARC and suppression patients, the amplitude ratio BVEP/SMVEP was negatively correlated with the amount of the angle of deviation.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that losses in amplitude facilitation and phase shortening of binocular steady-state VEPs reflect abnormal binocular interactions associated with different forms of sensorial adaptation in concomitant strabismus.

Strabismus surgery in children: the prospects for binocular single vision

The restoration or maintenance of useful binocular single vision (BSV) represents the ideal outcome in the management of a squinting child. However, in planning such management it is essential to have a clear appreciation of the likelihood of attaining that goal, and what factors will help in its attainment. Using both a literature review and some preliminary information from our own patient database we examine the prospects for BSV in different strabismus groups. We also discuss the techniques available to allow prediction of which children are candidates for the development of BSV following squint correction.

Distance judgement in comitant strabismus with anomalous retinal correspondence

Judgement of distances was evaluated in 19 patients with comitant esotropia and without appreciable stereopsis. In nine patients anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) was present at Bagolini's striated glasses. In the remaining patients there was suppression with the same test. Distance judgement of strabismics with ARC does not differ statistically from that one of normals. Significantly different results were found in strabismics with suppression. It is concluded that ARC is not only an anti-diplopic mechanism, but provides the patients with useful clues in their daily life.

Incremental binocular amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential during the first five months of life: electrophysiological evidence of the development of binocularity

The amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential (VEP) of a binocular stimulus has been shown to be generally larger than the VEP obtained monocularly. There is evidence that this effect can be considered an electrophysiological index of fusion. To study how binocular vision develops in infancy we evaluated the incremental binocular amplitude (IBA) in three infants in a longitudinal investigation during the first five months of life. The stimuli were phase-alternating square-wave gratings with spatial and temporal parameters chosen to be appropriate for neonates. IBA was defined as the percentage increment of the largest binocular response compared with the monocular response. In the first two months of life IBA values were near zero, that is, no summation occurred. Between the second and third month IBA values rose markedly and after the third month its value was greater than 100%, demonstrating binocular facilitation. Thus in the first two months of life the eyes do not seem to cooperate as in adults. By the second and third month the binocular pattern VEP reflects an increasing binocular interaction. Other studies of the development of stereopsis have also found evidence of binocularity at similar ages.

Critical analysis of visual function evaluating techniques in newborn babies

The most widely-used techniques for testing visual function in babies are reviewed. Advantages and limitations of optokinetic nystagmus testing, visual evoked responses and preferential looking techniques are considered. The theoretical basis and the clinical applicability of those techniques are outlined. Other simple methods are considered as well, which allow practicing ophthalmologists to assess the presence or absence of vision in babies. The importance of early diagnosis for prevention and treatment of visual deficits in babies is stressed.