Determination of the technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine plasma clearance in children by means of a single blood sample: a multicentre study. The Paediatric Task Group of the EANM

A comparison of single plasma sample methods to estimate renal clearance using 99mTc-ethylenedicysteine and 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine

Several single sample methods for determination of (99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) clearance are being used clinically. Kabasakal et al. proposed a similar formula for (99m)Tc-ethylenedicysteine (EC). This study was performed to compare his method with Bubeck et al. formula for (99m)Tc-MAG3 already in use. Twenty-eight subjects divided in two groups were registered which included 22 patients with various renal diseases (group-I) and six normal volunteers (group II). All subjects were studied twice using both the radiopharmaceuticals. The images and renogram parameters, that is TMAX and T1/2 of both the agents, were similar in all the subjects. The clearance of the (99m)Tc-EC was however considerably higher than (99m)Tc-MAG3 in both the groups (mean ± SEM =279 ± 14 ml min(-1)/1.73 m(2) versus 177 ± 15 ml min(-1)/1.73 m(2) in group-I and 377 ± 11.90 ml min(-1)/1.73 m(2) versus 238 ± 8.23 ml min(-1)/1.73 m(2) in group II). This difference was more pronounced in cases with reduced renal functions. Among the Effective Renal Plasma Flow (ERPF) values determined from EC and MAG3 clearances in six normal volunteers, four cases only in MAG3 had ERPF below the lower limit. This study has demonstrated superiority of single sample method for (99 m)Tc-EC clearance over its analogous method for (99m)Tc-MAG3.

Reproducibility of technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine clearance

The aim of this paper was to determine the reproducibility (precision) of technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) clearance and to compare it with that of chromium-51 ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA). Twelve young volunteers (aged between 21 and 34 years), without any history of medical problems, were enrolled in this study. The test was performed twice, at an interval of 8 days and under similar physiological conditions. After the intravenous injection of both tracers, 15 blood samples were taken between 3 and 240 min. A biexponential fit was adapted to the plasma disappearance curves (5- to 120-min samples for 99mTc-MAG3 and 10- to 240-min samples for 51Cr-EDTA); the clearances were calculated according to Sapirstein and corrected for body surface area. The mean clearance values were 110 (range 85-130) and 226 (range 109-319)ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively, for 51Cr-EDTA and 99mTc-MAG3. For 51Cr-EDTA clearance, the mean difference between the first and the second measurement was -2.1% of the mean of the two successive values (SD: 8.4%). In ten cases, the difference was less than 12%; in two cases, the differences were 15% and 18%, respectively. For 99mTc-MAG3 clearance, the mean difference between the first and the second measurement was -20% of the mean of the two successive values (SD: 25%). In six cases, the difference was less than 12%; in four cases, between 15% and 40%; and in two cases, more than 60%. Methodological factors (impurities contained in the commercial kit, variable protein binding) as well as physiological factors (pH of urine, sodium load, stress) may explain the lack of precision of the 99mTc-MAG3 clearance. It is concluded that changes in 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance should be interpreted with care in daily routine.

A single-injection, two-sample method for measuring renal 99mTc-MAG3 clearance in both children and adults

We present a method for estimating 99mTc-MAG3 clearance from both a single injection and two blood samples that is valid for both adults and children. It was obtained by fitting a scaled two-compartment model (having only two adjustable parameters) to adult and pediatric data from multiple centers.