A hyaluronate secretor in the nasal mucosa: a cytochemical study using hyaluronidase-gold

Efficacy of hyaluronic acid in the treatment of nasal inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA), the main component of the extracellular matrix, has the ability to promote tissue repair and regulate inflammation. It is used in otolaryngology as an adjuvant treatment to alleviate postoperative nasal symptoms. However, there is currently insufficient evidence demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy of HA for patients with nasal inflammatory diseases (NIDs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical HA in the treatment of NID patients without receiving surgery. Methods: In this meta-analysis, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Keywords searched included "hyaluronic acid," "sinusitis," "allergic rhinitis," "rhinitis," and "randomized controlled trials (RCTs)." The Cochrane Collaboration's "Risk of Bias Assessment" tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials, and the meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 and STATA 15 statistical software. Results: A total of 11 articles and 825 participants were enrolled. For the primary outcomes, the pooled results revealed that HA significantly improves nasal obstruction (SMD, -0.53; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.14; p = 0.008; and I2 = 79%) and rhinorrhea (SMD, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.15; p = 0.01; and I2 = 90%) in patients with NIDs. As for the secondary outcomes, the pooled results demonstrated that when compared with the control group, HA could significantly improve nasal endoscopic scores (p < 0.05), rhinitis scores (p < 0.05), rhinomanometry (p < 0.05), nasal neutrophils (p < 0.05), and mucociliary clearance (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding nasal itching, sneezing, hyposmia, quality-of-life scores, and nasal eosinophils. For the risk of bias, 54.5% and 45.5% of trials had a low risk of bias in the randomization process and deviation of the intended intervention, respectively. Conclusion: In the present study, the results reveal that HA might ameliorate symptoms of patients with NIDs. However, more clinical trials with larger participant cohorts are required to confirm this result. Systematic review registration number: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier CRD42023414539.

Randomised trial on performance, safety and clinical benefit of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol and isotonic saline nasal sprays in patients suffering from dry nose symptoms

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist on the clinical benefits of nasal applications for moistening the nasal mucosa. We therefore investigated the effects of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol and isotonic saline nasal sprays in patients suffering from dry nose symptoms in an otorhinolaryngological outpatient setting.

METHODS

240 patients were randomised into this prospective, three-armed clinical trial with two assessment points (baseline and 4 weeks later). Patients received either hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol or isotonic saline nasal spray over a period of four weeks. Rhinitis Sicca Symptom Score (RSSS) was assessed as primary endpoint, and individual symptoms and tolerability of all treatments as secondary endpoints. Patient perceptions after first application of the allocated nasal spray were recorded using the Nasal Spray Sensory Scale. Treatment effects were analysed for each study arm first and subsequently compared against each other.

RESULTS

RSSS (hyaluronic acid: mean difference = 8.90 [98.33% CI = 7.34/10.45]; hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol: mean difference = 8.42 [98.33% CI = 6.91/9.94]; isotonic saline: mean difference = 8.94 [98.33% CI = 7.33/10.54]), individual symptoms and Endoscopy Score improved significantly (p < 0.001) in all treatment arms. Tolerability was assessed as "flawless" in more than 85% of all treatments, which is reflected in overall high rankings in the Nasal Spray Sensory Scale. Perception of nasal moisturisation was reported to be significantly higher in patients receiving hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol as compared to patients receiving hyaluronic acid or isotonic saline. No further significant differences were observed between the three treatments.

CONCLUSION

All three tested sprays (hyaluronic acid, hyaluronic acid plus dexpanthenol and isotonic saline) proved to be suitable treatments for patients suffering from dry nose symptoms. (DRKS-ID: DRKS00013357).